FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics » Relativity
Burinski Kerr-Newman Micro-Geon or Chapline-Laughlin Dark Energy Star?
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [1 Post] View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Jack Sarfatti
science forum Guru


Joined: 29 Apr 2005
Posts: 487

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2005 2:14 pm    Post subject: Burinski Kerr-Newman Micro-Geon or Chapline-Laughlin Dark Energy Star? Reply with quote

Alexander Burinski in Moscow has made detailed models of the electron as
a Kerr-Newman metric http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0412065

The parameters in that metric from the electron's stabilizing dark
energy core would then be

G*m^2 = e^2

m and e are the measured rest mass and charge of the electron

J = (1/2)(h/2pi)

a = (1/2)h/mc

G*m/c^2 = e^2/mc^2 = classical radius of the electron ~ 1 fermi

This Kerr-Newman model must be compared to a "charged" dark star model
(e.g. Chapline & Laughlin)

“Dark Energy Stars”, G. Chapline, Proceedings of the Texas Conference
on Relativistic Astrophysics, Stanford, CA, December 12-17, (2004),
preprint astro-ph/0503200 ;
“Have nucleon decays already been seen?”, J. Barbierii and G. Chapline,
Phys Lett. B 590, 8, (2004);
“ Quantum Phase Transitions and the Breakdown of Classical General
Relativity”, G. Chapline, E. Hohlfeld, R. B. Laughlin, D. I. Santiago,
Int. J. Mod. Phys. A18 3587-90 (2003), preprint gr-qc/0012094.


On May 19, 2005, at 8:51 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

Note that an EVO of ~ 10^12 electrons close-packed in a spherical shell
has a radius

~ 10^6 x 10^-11 cm = 10^-5 cm ~ 0.1 micron

The counter-intuitive effective attractive gravity G* from this
homogeneously distributed repulsive vacuum zero point energy 3D harmonic
oscillator potential of negative pressure is

G*(Nm)^2 = (Ne)^2

G*m^2 = e^2

G* = (e/m)^2

independent of N

The effective gravity constant G* induced by the dark zero point energy
core of the electron is simply the square of the charge to mass ratio of
the electron.


On May 19, 2005, at 4:34 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:


On the extended space structure of a single electron

On May 13, 2005, at 7:46 AM, Ken Shoulders wrote:



A paper by Ken Shoulders entitled "EVOs And The Hutchison Effect" will
be presented at the 2005 Conference on Cold Fusion to be held at MIT on
May 21. A 1 MB .PDF file showing some of the graphics slides to be used
in that presentation can now be downloaded from:
http://www.svn.net/krscfs/

Ken




For a shell of N electrons

N(h/mc)^2 = 4piro^2

N^1/2(h/mc) = (4pi)^1/2ro

ro^3 = (Ne)^2/(2mc^2/\zpf)

N^3/2(h/mc)^3/(4pi)^3/2 = N^2e^2/2mc^2/\zpf

(h/mc)^3/(4pi)^3/2 = N^1/2e^2/2mc^2/\zpf

/\zpf = (4pi)^3/2N^1/2(e^2/2mc^2)/(h/mc)^3

e^2/hc ~ (1/137) = (classical electron radius)/(Compton radius)

/\zpf ~ (4pi)^3/2N^1/2(e^2/hc)(mc/h)^2

For a SINGLE ELECTRON N = 1 (Bohm hidden variable)

This solves a 100 year old problem from Lorentz.

The electron is a shell of charge with a dark energy core.

The zero point stress energy density tensor of the dark energy core is

tuv(ZPF core) = (c^4/8piG)/\zpfguv


On May 18, 2005, at 10:02 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:




bcc

PS for uniform /\zpf > 0 of negative pressure (dark energy core)

F/m = -dV/dr = -2c^2|/\zpf|ro + (Ne)^2/mro^2 = 0

ro^3 = (Ne)^2/2mc^2/\zpf

stability

d^2V/dr^2 = +2c^2|/\zpf| + 2(Ne)^2/mro^3 > 0


On May 18, 2005, at 9:42 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:




Note that my theory of Ken Shoulders charge clusters also has a dark
energy core that stabilizes the shell of N electrons. The dark energy
core potential ~ + c^2|/\zpf|r^2 holds the repulsive Coulomb barrier +
(Ne)^2/mr in check!

Similarly for Pioneer 10 & 11 anomaly, galactic halo & other phenomena.
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [1 Post] View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Fri Jan 09, 2009 9:54 pm | All times are GMT
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics » Relativity
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts I have found that a looooooooooot of ... gb6724 New Theories 5 Thu Jul 20, 2006 6:37 am
No new posts Energy (not pollution) and global war... PETER1929@TISCALI.CO.UK New Theories 3 Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:38 pm
No new posts How the public could understand dark ... gb6724 New Theories 9 Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:55 pm
No new posts The phrase 'dark matter' stephen@nomail.com Relativity 36 Mon Jul 17, 2006 1:57 am
No new posts derivation of relativistic kinetic en... castertroy14@hotmail.com Math 2 Sun Jul 16, 2006 12:22 am

Mobile Phones | Tour Management Software | Mortgages | Car Finance | Tour Management Software
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Electronics forum |  Medicine forum |  Unix/Linux blog |  Unix/Linux documentation |  Unix/Linux forums


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.2839s ][ Queries: 16 (0.2095s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]