| Author |
Message |
onehappymadman@yahoo.com
science forum Guru Wannabe
Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 107
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
apm
science forum beginner
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 19
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 1:36 pm Post subject:
Re: packed beds
|
|
|
I think maximizing surface area per pressure drop is much more important
than packing density.
Minimizing dispersion can be important in adsorption and ion exchange.
<onehappymadman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1129157199.401337.72500@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pranas
science forum beginner
Joined: 10 May 2005
Posts: 21
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 2:50 pm Post subject:
Re: packed beds
|
|
|
Subject: packed beds
Has anyone started to sell packed beds filled with oblate spheroid
catalyst yet?
Is this question the result of the finding that M&M candies are rather
densily packed and wondering about catalyst packing? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
onehappymadman@yahoo.com
science forum Guru Wannabe
Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 107
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 7:26 pm Post subject:
Re: packed beds
|
|
|
Pranas wrote:
| Quote: | Subject: packed beds
Has anyone started to sell packed beds filled with oblate spheroid
catalyst yet?
Is this question the result of the finding that M&M candies are rather
densily packed and wondering about catalyst packing?
|
yes - a 4% increase in packing density is nice... assuming it doesn't
increase the cost of catalyst preparation, that is |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Google
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Forum index
»
Science and Technology
»
Engineering
»
Chemical
