FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » Science and Technology » Math
strictly decreasing function with zero derivative on dense subset
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [7 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Henry1
science forum addict


Joined: 15 May 2005
Posts: 58

PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2005 10:25 pm    Post subject: Re: strictly decreasing function with zero derivative on dense subset Reply with quote

On Thu, 26 May 2005 06:22:46 -0500, David C. Ullrich
<ullrich@math.okstate.edu> wrote:

Quote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005 23:16:48 +0000 (UTC), Henry <se16@btinternet.com
wrote:
Take the interval [0,1]. Then exclude all points of the form a/2^m
(with a and m positive integers and a<2^m) and the intervals around
them [a/2^m - k/4^m, a/2^m + k/4^m] for some real k with 0<=k<=2.
For 0<k<2 this leaves a nowhere dense set with positive measure.

Let f(k) be the measure of that set - this has the desired properties:
in particular f'(k)=0 when k is of the form b/2^(n-1) with b and n
positive integers and b<2^n.

Huh. Two questions:

(i) Is it obvious that f'(k) = 0 for such k? (It's not immediately
clear to me, but I haven't thought about it enough to expect it
would be clear.)

The reason is that for such k the end point of each removed interval
falls in the middle of a smaller removed interval so small changes in
k lead to much smaller changes in the measure.

Quote:
(ii) Is this function differentiable _everywhere_? (Not that it's
relevant to the original question in this thread, but the point
to the example in Stromberg is that the function _is_ differentiable
at every point - if we settle for f almost everywhere differentiable
then it's much easier to get f' = 0 on a dense set.)

No: it is left- and right-differentiable everywhere, but these are
unequal at a countable set of points where the end point of a removed
interval coincides with the end point of a smaller removed interval.
Simple examples are when k=4/3 or k=4/5.
Back to top
David C. Ullrich
science forum Guru


Joined: 28 Apr 2005
Posts: 2250

PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2005 9:22 am    Post subject: Re: strictly decreasing function with zero derivative on dense subset Reply with quote

On Wed, 25 May 2005 23:16:48 +0000 (UTC), Henry <se16@btinternet.com>
wrote:

Quote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005 09:57:53 GMT, Kira Yamato <no@mail.net> wrote:

José Carlos Santos wrote:
On 25-05-2005 2:32, Henry wrote:

I seem to have a continuous strictly decreasing function
f(x):[0,2]->[0,1] which seems to have a derivative f'(x)=0 for x in a
dense subset of [0,2]. It that possible?


There's an example of such a funcion in Stromberg's "Introduction to
Classical Real Analysis", for instance. Well, actually what he gives is
an example of a strictly *increasing* function whose derivative is 0 in
a dense set, but... :-)

I think the example you mentioned is this one: let {r_n} be the
rationals. Define
f(x) := x + sum_n (x-r_n)^(1/3)/(n^2 (1+ |r_n|)^(1/3)).
Then the inverse function F of f has that property.

Mine is rather different:

Take the interval [0,1]. Then exclude all points of the form a/2^m
(with a and m positive integers and a<2^m) and the intervals around
them [a/2^m - k/4^m, a/2^m + k/4^m] for some real k with 0<=k<=2.
For 0<k<2 this leaves a nowhere dense set with positive measure.

Let f(k) be the measure of that set - this has the desired properties:
in particular f'(k)=0 when k is of the form b/2^(n-1) with b and n
positive integers and b<2^n.

Huh. Two questions:

(i) Is it obvious that f'(k) = 0 for such k? (It's not immediately
clear to me, but I haven't thought about it enough to expect it
would be clear.)

(ii) Is this function differentiable _everywhere_? (Not that it's
relevant to the original question in this thread, but the point
to the example in Stromberg is that the function _is_ differentiable
at every point - if we settle for f almost everywhere differentiable
then it's much easier to get f' = 0 on a dense set.)


************************

David C. Ullrich
Back to top
Henry1
science forum addict


Joined: 15 May 2005
Posts: 58

PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2005 11:16 pm    Post subject: Re: strictly decreasing function with zero derivative on dense subset Reply with quote

On Wed, 25 May 2005 09:57:53 GMT, Kira Yamato <no@mail.net> wrote:

Quote:
José Carlos Santos wrote:
On 25-05-2005 2:32, Henry wrote:

I seem to have a continuous strictly decreasing function
f(x):[0,2]->[0,1] which seems to have a derivative f'(x)=0 for x in a
dense subset of [0,2]. It that possible?


There's an example of such a funcion in Stromberg's "Introduction to
Classical Real Analysis", for instance. Well, actually what he gives is
an example of a strictly *increasing* function whose derivative is 0 in
a dense set, but... :-)

I think the example you mentioned is this one: let {r_n} be the
rationals. Define
f(x) := x + sum_n (x-r_n)^(1/3)/(n^2 (1+ |r_n|)^(1/3)).
Then the inverse function F of f has that property.

Mine is rather different:

Take the interval [0,1]. Then exclude all points of the form a/2^m
(with a and m positive integers and a<2^m) and the intervals around
them [a/2^m - k/4^m, a/2^m + k/4^m] for some real k with 0<=k<=2.
For 0<k<2 this leaves a nowhere dense set with positive measure.

Let f(k) be the measure of that set - this has the desired properties:
in particular f'(k)=0 when k is of the form b/2^(n-1) with b and n
positive integers and b<2^n.
Back to top
Kira Yamato
science forum beginner


Joined: 03 May 2005
Posts: 37

PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2005 7:57 am    Post subject: Re: strictly decreasing function with zero derivative on dense subset Reply with quote

José Carlos Santos wrote:
Quote:
On 25-05-2005 2:32, Henry wrote:

I seem to have a continuous strictly decreasing function
f(x):[0,2]->[0,1] which seems to have a derivative f'(x)=0 for x in a
dense subset of [0,2]. It that possible?


There's an example of such a funcion in Stromberg's "Introduction to
Classical Real Analysis", for instance. Well, actually what he gives is
an example of a strictly *increasing* function whose derivative is 0 in
a dense set, but... Smile

I think the example you mentioned is this one: let {r_n} be the
rationals. Define
f(x) := x + sum_n (x-r_n)^(1/3)/(n^2 (1+ |r_n|)^(1/3)).
Then the inverse function F of f has that property.

Really cool stuff.

-kira

Quote:

Best regards,

Jose Carlos Santos
Back to top
José Carlos Santos
science forum Guru


Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 1111

PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2005 6:03 am    Post subject: Re: strictly decreasing function with zero derivative on dense subset Reply with quote

On 25-05-2005 2:32, Henry wrote:

Quote:
I seem to have a continuous strictly decreasing function
f(x):[0,2]->[0,1] which seems to have a derivative f'(x)=0 for x in a
dense subset of [0,2]. It that possible?

There's an example of such a funcion in Stromberg's "Introduction to
Classical Real Analysis", for instance. Well, actually what he gives is
an example of a strictly *increasing* function whose derivative is 0 in
a dense set, but... :-)

Best regards,

Jose Carlos Santos
Back to top
Justin Young
science forum addict


Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 55

PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2005 1:32 am    Post subject: Re: strictly decreasing function with zero derivative on dense subset Reply with quote

"Henry" <se16@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:02l791911o30innftv84rb6pqc6ei6bjih@4ax.com...
Quote:
I seem to have a continuous strictly decreasing function
f(x):[0,2]->[0,1] which seems to have a derivative f'(x)=0 for x in a
dense subset of [0,2]. It that possible?

Yes.
Back to top
Henry1
science forum addict


Joined: 15 May 2005
Posts: 58

PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2005 1:32 am    Post subject: strictly decreasing function with zero derivative on dense subset Reply with quote

I seem to have a continuous strictly decreasing function
f(x):[0,2]->[0,1] which seems to have a derivative f'(x)=0 for x in a
dense subset of [0,2]. It that possible?
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [7 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Fri Jul 01, 2011 10:55 am | All times are GMT
Forum index » Science and Technology » Math
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts Generating function for Mathieu functions cosmicstring@gmail.com Math 1 Fri Jul 21, 2006 8:39 am
No new posts a subset of natural number levine121323@yahoo.com Math 1 Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:17 am
No new posts Choice function over finite sets Peter Webb Math 5 Fri Jul 21, 2006 3:28 am
No new posts Function from Taylor series? Nathan Urban Research 1 Thu Jul 20, 2006 12:48 am
No new posts Function not in L_1 {[0,1]}, but satisfies ...? atkrunner@hotmail.com Math 12 Thu Jul 20, 2006 12:46 am

Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Electronics forum |  Medicine forum |  Unix/Linux blog |  Unix/Linux documentation |  Unix/Linux forums  |  send newsletters
 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.8941s ][ Queries: 20 (0.8550s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]