|
|
| Author |
Message |
mike lowry science forum beginner
Joined: 20 May 2006
Posts: 7
|
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 5:40 am Post subject:
locally invertible
|
|
|
|
Let L: R^2 -> R^2 be an invertible linear map and f(x) = L(x) + g(x), where |g(x) < or = |x|^2. Show that f is locally invertible in some open neighborhood of x = 0. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David C. Ullrich science forum Guru
Joined: 28 Apr 2005
Posts: 2250
|
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 10:47 am Post subject:
Re: locally invertible
|
|
|
On Sat, 20 May 2006 01:40:31 EDT, mike lowry <mmehdiza@gmu.edu> wrote:
| Quote: | Let L: R^2 -> R^2 be an invertible linear map and f(x) = L(x) + g(x), where |g(x) < or = |x|^2. Show that f is locally invertible in some open neighborhood of x = 0.
|
Probably you've covered a certain big theorem that says if f satisfies
a certain condition or conditions then f is invertible, right?
************************
David C. Ullrich |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The World Wide Wade science forum Guru
Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 790
|
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 8:37 pm Post subject:
Re: locally invertible
|
|
|
In article
<30114433.1148103661533.JavaMail.jakarta@nitrogen.mathforum.org>,
mike lowry <mmehdiza@gmu.edu> wrote:
| Quote: | Let L: R^2 -> R^2 be an invertible linear map and f(x) = L(x) + g(x), where
|g(x) < or = |x|^2. Show that f is locally invertible in some open
neighborhood of x = 0.
|
This is false. f need not be 1-1 in any neighborhood of 0. Start
in one dimension: we can find f such that x <= f(x) <= x + x^2,
but such that every open interval about 0 contains a subinterval
where f is constant. The extension to 2 dimensions is not
difficult. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David C. Ullrich science forum Guru
Joined: 28 Apr 2005
Posts: 2250
|
Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 12:04 pm Post subject:
Re: locally invertible
|
|
|
On Sat, 20 May 2006 13:37:17 -0700, The World Wide Wade
<waderameyxiii@comcast.remove13.net> wrote:
Hmm, yes of course it is. Wonder how I thought it was true
the other day...
Oh. It's true if we assume that g is smooth enough (C^1, I
think). I think.
| Quote: | f need not be 1-1 in any neighborhood of 0. Start
in one dimension: we can find f such that x <= f(x) <= x + x^2,
but such that every open interval about 0 contains a subinterval
where f is constant. The extension to 2 dimensions is not
difficult.
|
************************
David C. Ullrich |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The World Wide Wade science forum Guru
Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 790
|
Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 7:03 pm Post subject:
Re: locally invertible
|
|
|
In article <pol0725q12sllipi4sglspqg9atgf3in9k@4ax.com>,
David C. Ullrich <ullrich@math.okstate.edu> wrote:
| Quote: | On Sat, 20 May 2006 13:37:17 -0700, The World Wide Wade
waderameyxiii@comcast.remove13.net> wrote:
In article
30114433.1148103661533.JavaMail.jakarta@nitrogen.mathforum.org>,
mike lowry <mmehdiza@gmu.edu> wrote:
Let L: R^2 -> R^2 be an invertible linear map and f(x) = L(x) + g(x),
where
|g(x) < or = |x|^2. Show that f is locally invertible in some open
neighborhood of x = 0.
This is false.
Hmm, yes of course it is. Wonder how I thought it was true
the other day...
Oh. It's true if we assume that g is smooth enough (C^1, I
think). I think.
|
Sure, then you could use the inverse function theorem. But
there's an elementary direct proof if g is C^1.
| Quote: | f need not be 1-1 in any neighborhood of 0. Start
in one dimension: we can find f such that x <= f(x) <= x + x^2,
but such that every open interval about 0 contains a subinterval
where f is constant. The extension to 2 dimensions is not
difficult.
************************
David C. Ullrich |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
The time now is Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:23 pm | All times are GMT
|
|
Auto Insurance | Guitar Lessons | Debt Help | Credit Cards | Free Ringtones
|
|
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
|
|
Other DeniX Solutions sites:
Electronics forum |
Medicine forum |
Unix/Linux blog |
Unix/Linux documentation |
Unix/Linux forums
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|