|
|
| Author |
Message |
TedMaul science forum beginner
Joined: 14 Jun 2005
Posts: 4
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 9:46 pm Post subject:
Inverse hyperbolic substitutions in integration
|
|
|
hi all,
I've got an expression to integrate which is as follows:
1/((x^2)Sqrt[1-x^2])
Now I've managed to generate an answer (which I confirmed as correct in Mathematica), but I've been specifically asked to solve using hyperbolic trig, which is proving something of a problem. I've so far been unable to put this into any form which will facilitate the above (thanks largely to the annoying x^2 term). I feel like I'm missing something really obvious. Any help would be very much appreciated. Thanks in advance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Arturo Magidin science forum Guru
Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 1838
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:04 pm Post subject:
Re: Inverse hyperbolic substitutions in integration
|
|
|
In article <16251688.1118785624546.JavaMail.jakarta@nitrogen.mathforum.org>,
TedMaul <ben@dris.demon.co.uk> wrote:
| Quote: | hi all,
I've got an expression to integrate which is as follows:
1/((x^2)Sqrt[1-x^2])
Now I've managed to generate an answer (which I confirmed as correct
in Mathematica), but I've been specifically asked to solve using
hyperbolic trig, which is proving something of a problem. I've so far
been unable to put this into any form which will facilitate the above
(thanks largely to the annoying x^2 term). I feel like I'm missing
something really obvious. Any help would be very much
appreciated. Thanks in advance.
|
Hmmm... Well, we can set x = tanh(z). Then
1 - x^2 = 1 - tanh^2(z) = (cosh^2 z - sinh^2 z)/cosh^2 z
= 1/cosh^2 z = sech^2(z). Then
1/(x^2*sqrt[1-x^2]) = 1/(tanh^2(z)sech(z)
Since dx = d(tanh x) = sech^2(z)dz this gives
dx/[x^2*sqrt[1-x^2] = sech^2(z)dz / (tanh^2(z)sech (z))
= sech(z)dz/tanh^2(z)
= cosh(z)dz/sinh^2(z)
which you should spot very easily how to integrate.
--
======================================================================
"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
what I accept as reality."
--- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes")
======================================================================
Arturo Magidin
magidin@math.berkeley.edu |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Virgil science forum Guru
Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 5536
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:25 pm Post subject:
Re: Inverse hyperbolic substitutions in integration
|
|
|
In article
<16251688.1118785624546.JavaMail.jakarta@nitrogen.mathforum.org>,
TedMaul <ben@dris.demon.co.uk> wrote:
| Quote: | hi all,
I've got an expression to integrate which is as follows:
1/((x^2)Sqrt[1-x^2])
Now I've managed to generate an answer (which I confirmed as correct in
Mathematica), but I've been specifically asked to solve using hyperbolic
trig, which is proving something of a problem. I've so far been unable to put
this into any form which will facilitate the above (thanks largely to the
annoying x^2 term). I feel like I'm missing something really obvious. Any
help would be very much appreciated. Thanks in advance.
|
The only hyperbolic identity which springs to mind is
1- tanh(t)^2 = sech(y)^2
suggesting the substitution
x = tanh(t), dx = sech(t)^2 dt.
The resulting integral is manageable, with a bit of imagination. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TedMaul science forum beginner
Joined: 14 Jun 2005
Posts: 4
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:41 pm Post subject:
Re: Inverse hyperbolic substitutions in integration
|
|
|
Thanks for the suggestion. I'd just been trying the substitution x=sech[u], which seems to work.
For anyone who's interested the answer comes to:
-sinh[ln((1+Sqrt[1-x^2])/x)]
I'll take your advice and try with tanh[u] though. Thanks for the help. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
The time now is Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:30 pm | All times are GMT
|
|
Western Union Money Order | Debt Consolidation | Xbox Mod Chip | Loans | Free Ipod Nano
|
|
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
|
|
Other DeniX Solutions sites:
Electronics forum |
Medicine forum |
Unix/Linux blog |
Unix/Linux documentation |
Unix/Linux forums
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|