FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » Science and Technology » Math » Undergraduate
Group theory: Z_n (n approaches infinity)
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [7 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
joostef@gmail.com
science forum beginner


Joined: 13 May 2006
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 11:35 pm    Post subject: Group theory: Z_n (n approaches infinity) Reply with quote

Consider Z_n = {0,1,2,...,n-1}, which forms a group under addition (mod
n). So, x+y (mod n) = x+y, if 0<=x+y<n; or x+y-n, if x+y>=n. Now let
n go to infinity and thus define L = Z_n (n -> infinity).

Could anyone help me with the following questions?

(1) Is L a group?
(1b) Since any finite sum x_1+x_2+...+x_k < infinity, that is to say,
any finite sum converges in L, can we say that L is isomorphic to the
non-negative integers? What I mean is, does there exist a bijective
function f : L -> N={0,1,2,...}? If we look at how I defined addition
(mod n), it would appear that we will never have the case x+y >
infinity, so closure will be maintained.

I'm having a bit of trouble wrapping my mind around it. Intuitively,
it makes sense to me, but I know what holds for finite n may not
necessarily hold when we go arbitrarily large. Is there a problem with
my construction?

-Francois.
Back to top
Brian M. Scott
science forum Guru


Joined: 10 May 2005
Posts: 332

PostPosted: Tue May 23, 2006 11:56 pm    Post subject: Re: Group theory: Z_n (n approaches infinity) Reply with quote

On 23 May 2006 16:35:58 -0700, <joostef@gmail.com> wrote in
<news:1148427358.091912.157420@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
in alt.math.undergrad:

Quote:
Consider Z_n = {0,1,2,...,n-1}, which forms a group under addition (mod
n). So, x+y (mod n) = x+y, if 0<=x+y<n; or x+y-n, if x+y>=n. Now let
n go to infinity and thus define L = Z_n (n -> infinity).

How? This isn't a standard notion of limit, so it isn't
meaningful until you give it a meaning.

[...]

Quote:
Is there a problem with my construction?

Yes: it's undefined.

Brian
Back to top
joostef@gmail.com
science forum beginner


Joined: 13 May 2006
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Wed May 24, 2006 1:14 am    Post subject: Re: Group theory: Z_n (n approaches infinity) Reply with quote

Quote:
Consider Z_n = {0,1,2,...,n-1}, which forms a group under addition (mod
n). So, x+y (mod n) = x+y, if 0<=x+y<n; or x+y-n, if x+y>=n. Now let
n go to infinity and thus define L = Z_n (n -> infinity).

How? This isn't a standard notion of limit, so it isn't
meaningful until you give it a meaning.

Hm. Good point. How about this: to say Z_n approaches the limit L as
n approaches infinity means that, for any positive integer K, there is
a positive integer M such that the order of Z_n is greater or equal to
K for all n>=M. Whereas Z_n={m : m nonnegative integer from 0 to n-1},
we would have L={m : m nonnegative integer from 0 to lim(n->infinity)
(n-1)}.

-Francois.
Back to top
Brian M. Scott
science forum Guru


Joined: 10 May 2005
Posts: 332

PostPosted: Wed May 24, 2006 1:30 am    Post subject: Re: Group theory: Z_n (n approaches infinity) Reply with quote

On 23 May 2006 18:14:46 -0700, <joostef@gmail.com> wrote in
<news:1148433286.668542.38030@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
in alt.math.undergrad:

Quote:
Consider Z_n = {0,1,2,...,n-1}, which forms a group under addition (mod
n). So, x+y (mod n) = x+y, if 0<=x+y<n; or x+y-n, if x+y>=n. Now let
n go to infinity and thus define L = Z_n (n -> infinity).

How? This isn't a standard notion of limit, so it isn't
meaningful until you give it a meaning.

Hm. Good point. How about this: to say Z_n approaches the limit L as
n approaches infinity means that, for any positive integer K, there is
a positive integer M such that the order of Z_n is greater or equal to
K for all n>=M.

I'm afraid that this doesn't make sense as stated: you're
trying to define 'Z_n approaches L as n approaches
infinity', but your attempt at a definition nowhere mentions
L.

You actually need to define a meaningful general notion of
the limit of a sequence of sets before any of this is going
to make sense. There are notions of that kind, but many of
them require a topological context. Here the only
reasonable notion of of the limit of the sets Z_n is their
union, the set N = {0, 1, 2, ...} of natural numbers.
However, the group operations on the Z_n are not related in
any nice way, and as a result there is no natural limit of
these operations on N. Any group operation that you define
on N will be essentially unrelated to the operations on the
Z_n. (Note that ordinary operation absolutely will not
work, since you won't have inverses.)

[...]

Brian
Back to top
joostef@gmail.com
science forum beginner


Joined: 13 May 2006
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Wed May 24, 2006 1:45 am    Post subject: Re: Group theory: Z_n (n approaches infinity) Reply with quote

Brian wrote:
Quote:
However, the group operations on the Z_n are not related in
any nice way, and as a result there is no natural limit of
these operations on N. Any group operation that you define
on N will be essentially unrelated to the operations on the
Z_n. (Note that ordinary operation absolutely will not
work, since you won't have inverses.)

Ah, now I understand. I was doing a lot of handwaving, but I wasn't
even thinking about how the operations relate to each other. And your
last point tells me at least that if L had a similar structure to N,
then, yeah, it wouldn't be a group, which answers my question.

Thanks for the help.

-Francois.
Back to top
Arturo Magidin
science forum Guru


Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 1838

PostPosted: Wed May 24, 2006 3:50 am    Post subject: Re: Group theory: Z_n (n approaches infinity) Reply with quote

In article <1148427358.091912.157420@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
<joostef@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
Consider Z_n = {0,1,2,...,n-1}, which forms a group under addition (mod
n). So, x+y (mod n) = x+y, if 0<=x+y<n; or x+y-n, if x+y>=n. Now let
n go to infinity and thus define L = Z_n (n -> infinity).

And what does that mean, exactly?

What concept of limit are you trying to use here? There isn't a unique
one, you know.

In group theory, there ->is<- a concept of limit, but you need to
specify a lot more than just what the groups are.

Quote:
Could anyone help me with the following questions?

(1) Is L a group?

Right now, "L" is nonsense.


Quote:
I'm having a bit of trouble wrapping my mind around it.

Probably because you are being extremely sloppy.

First, you need to decide just ->what<- it means to take "the limit of
a sequence of groups". What does it mean to say that L is "the limit
of Z_n as n goes to infinity"? To me, it's just nonsense.

Quote:
Is there a problem with my construction?

Don't know. You haven't given any constructions. You just threw some
notation at the wall and hoped it would stick. But we're not trying to
cook pasta, you know.

--
======================================================================
"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
what I accept as reality."
--- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes")
======================================================================

Arturo Magidin
magidin@math.berkeley.edu
Back to top
Arturo Magidin
science forum Guru


Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 1838

PostPosted: Wed May 24, 2006 3:53 am    Post subject: Re: Group theory: Z_n (n approaches infinity) Reply with quote

In article <1148433286.668542.38030@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
<joostef@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
Consider Z_n = {0,1,2,...,n-1}, which forms a group under addition (mod
n). So, x+y (mod n) = x+y, if 0<=x+y<n; or x+y-n, if x+y>=n. Now let
n go to infinity and thus define L = Z_n (n -> infinity).

How? This isn't a standard notion of limit, so it isn't
meaningful until you give it a meaning.

Hm. Good point. How about this: to say Z_n approaches the limit L as
n approaches infinity means that, for any positive integer K, there is
a positive integer M such that the order of Z_n is greater or equal to
K for all n>=M.

This still makes no sense. First, note that your "definition"
mentions L at the beginning, but fails to mention it again. So why is
L part of the "definition"?

What you describe is simply: a sequence of finite groups of increasing
order, whose order grows without limit. You have not really defined
any kind of limit, though.


======================================================================
"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
what I accept as reality."
--- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes")
======================================================================

Arturo Magidin
magidin@math.berkeley.edu
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [7 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:48 pm | All times are GMT
Forum index » Science and Technology » Math » Undergraduate
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts unified theory gb6724 New Theories 4 Fri Jul 21, 2006 5:25 am
No new posts Signal Nonlocality Loophole in Quantu... Jack Sarfatti Math 0 Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:59 am
No new posts A Combinatorics/Graph Theory Question mathlover Undergraduate 1 Wed Jul 19, 2006 11:30 pm
No new posts A Combinatorics/Graph Theory Question mathlover Math 2 Wed Jul 19, 2006 11:02 pm
No new posts A Combinatorics/Graph Theory Question mathlover Combinatorics 0 Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:58 pm

Tour Management Software | Mobile Phones | Hypotheek Berekenen | Libro infantiles | Mobile Phone
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Electronics forum |  Medicine forum |  Unix/Linux blog |  Unix/Linux documentation |  Unix/Linux forums


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.1795s ][ Queries: 16 (0.0878s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]