FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » Science and Technology » Engineering » Mechanics
another air conditioning question
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [6 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Riccardo Balistrerri
science forum beginner


Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 11

PostPosted: Wed May 24, 2006 12:59 am    Post subject: another air conditioning question Reply with quote

Hello guys,

I enjoyed reading the conversation about the air conditioning, even if at
some points was a bit too... Anyway, I think I heard that is better to have
the air conditioner run 24/7 for mantainance and cost... is that true of
conventional air conditioners and a work enviromnent where the space is used
for half of the day... (I'm working in Malaysia... hot and humid!)

Thank you,
R.
Back to top
N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)
science forum Guru


Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 2835

PostPosted: Wed May 24, 2006 1:25 am    Post subject: Re: another air conditioning question Reply with quote

Dear ri:

"ri" <riccardo.balistreri@poste.it> wrote in message
news:4473b003$1_1@news.tm.net.my...
Quote:
Hello guys,

I enjoyed reading the conversation about the air
conditioning, even if at some points was a bit too...
Anyway, I think I heard that is better to have the
air conditioner run 24/7 for mantainance and cost...
is that true of conventional air conditioners and a
work enviromnent where the space is used for half
of the day... (I'm working in Malaysia... hot and
humid!)

Unless you sell electricity, replacement units, or service on
existing units, then *of course* it is a good idea to spread this
rumor. ;>)

No it is NOT better to leave the air conditioner running at the
same temperature setpoint 24/7. If the compressor can be started
with a VFD or "soft start", then you will save wear and tear on
that component. A good unit probably already has this feature
(or one that bypasses the expansion valve on startup, or some
such "load limiter"). If the system is well designed and
implemented, and has the proper refrigerant charge, then liquid
ingestion issues are non-existant.

It is not necessary to keep the plant air "cold" off shift.
There are "electronic thermostats" that can alter the temperature
setpoint based on a schedule. This will be probably your best
bet. The plant doesn't have to become supersaturated with
heat/humidity, and then the A/C unit has to climb out of the
hole... Might be good to limit what exhaust fans can run when
the A/C is off also, as they will provide high loads.

Lastly, the air filters can/will provide a negative air pressure
in the ducting between the filter elements and the fan, and this
too can carry a penalty if the fan is left running continuously.

David A. Smith
Back to top
Chris W
science forum beginner


Joined: 19 Jun 2005
Posts: 20

PostPosted: Wed May 24, 2006 6:28 am    Post subject: Re: another air conditioning question Reply with quote

N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote:

Quote:
It is not necessary to keep the plant air "cold" off shift.
There are "electronic thermostats" that can alter the temperature
setpoint based on a schedule. This will be probably your best
bet. The plant doesn't have to become supersaturated with
heat/humidity, and then the A/C unit has to climb out of the
hole...

This brings up another question I had. Wouldn't setting the thermostat
to a low temperature at say around 3AM, so it slowly cooled the building
off to a pretty low temperature help? That way it wouldn't require as
much energy to keep it cool during the day? Kind of like letting your
car build up speed going down the mountain and then slowly bleeding it
off as you climb up the next. Would this be efficient? My guess is
that it may require too low of a setting in the mornings, or too high of
a setting in the afternoon, to be comfortable, if it is going to have a
significant effect.


--
Chris W
KE5GIX

Gift Giving Made Easy
Get the gifts you want &
give the gifts they want
One stop wish list for any gift,
from anywhere, for any occasion!
http://thewishzone.com
Back to top
N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)
science forum Guru


Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 2835

PostPosted: Wed May 24, 2006 1:18 pm    Post subject: Re: another air conditioning question Reply with quote

Dear Chris W:

"Chris W" <1qazse4@cox.net> wrote in message
news:K2Tcg.50727$9c6.36725@dukeread11...
Quote:
N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote:

It is not necessary to keep the plant air "cold" off
shift. There are "electronic thermostats" that can
alter the temperature setpoint based on a
schedule. This will be probably your best bet. The
plant doesn't have to become supersaturated with
heat/humidity, and then the A/C unit has to climb
out of the hole...

This brings up another question I had. Wouldn't
setting the thermostat to a low temperature at say
around 3AM, so it slowly cooled the building off to
a pretty low temperature help?

Only if the unit were so undersized that it couldn't handle the
daytime load.

Quote:
That way it wouldn't require as much energy to
keep it cool during the day? Kind of like letting
your car build up speed going down the mountain
and then slowly bleeding it off as you climb up the
next.

You could "store the cold" in a reservoir, much as is done in
passive cooling systems. Then add heat to the reservoir during
the day. But you would need really good insulation on the
reservoir...

Quote:
Would this be efficient? My guess is that it may
require too low of a setting in the mornings, or too
high of a setting in the afternoon, to be
comfortable, if it is going to have a significant effect.

It would not be efficient, since A/C unit efficiency is really
"tuned" to a particular outside/inside temperature gradient.
Also, the colder you drop the internal temp, the higher the
ambient heat transfer into your building. No it is most
efficient to have the "road ise to meet your feet", and the
building gets to temp just as employees arrive.

David A. Smith
Back to top
YouGoFirst
science forum beginner


Joined: 13 Jul 2005
Posts: 47

PostPosted: Wed May 24, 2006 4:59 pm    Post subject: Re: another air conditioning question Reply with quote

Assuming that the Air Conditioning is for that room only and the room is
used at a set time every day, you would be best off using a programmable
thermostat. With the thermostat you can set it up to turn on about 1 hour
before people begin to work, and shut off when the room is no longer being
used.

You may also want to consider connecting dehumidifiers to your HVAC system.
That way you remove more humidity than the AC unit alone. Without the
humidity people will be able to cool down in a more natural way.


"ri" <riccardo.balistreri@poste.it> wrote in message
news:4473b003$1_1@news.tm.net.my...
Quote:
Hello guys,

I enjoyed reading the conversation about the air conditioning, even if at
some points was a bit too... Anyway, I think I heard that is better to
have the air conditioner run 24/7 for mantainance and cost... is that true
of conventional air conditioners and a work enviromnent where the space is
used for half of the day... (I'm working in Malaysia... hot and humid!)

Thank you,
R.
Back to top
Harry Andreas
science forum beginner


Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 22

PostPosted: Wed May 24, 2006 5:29 pm    Post subject: Re: another air conditioning question Reply with quote

In article <K2Tcg.50727$9c6.36725@dukeread11>, Chris W <1qazse4@cox.net> wrote:

Quote:
N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote:

It is not necessary to keep the plant air "cold" off shift.
There are "electronic thermostats" that can alter the temperature
setpoint based on a schedule. This will be probably your best
bet. The plant doesn't have to become supersaturated with
heat/humidity, and then the A/C unit has to climb out of the
hole...

This brings up another question I had. Wouldn't setting the thermostat
to a low temperature at say around 3AM, so it slowly cooled the building
off to a pretty low temperature help? That way it wouldn't require as
much energy to keep it cool during the day? Kind of like letting your
car build up speed going down the mountain and then slowly bleeding it
off as you climb up the next. Would this be efficient? My guess is
that it may require too low of a setting in the mornings, or too high of
a setting in the afternoon, to be comfortable, if it is going to have a
significant effect.

Here at my job in SoCal the company does this.
During the summer months they run the airco hard all night when power
is cheap. It's cold as hell in the morning. They shut if off for the peak
hours and the building slowly warms up.

Saves money and saves brownouts, but you look funny wearing a parka
in to work when it's 85F at 8AM.

--
Harry Andreas
Engineering raconteur
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [6 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Fri Jan 09, 2009 12:40 am | All times are GMT
Forum index » Science and Technology » Engineering » Mechanics
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts Question about Life. socratus Probability 0 Sun Jan 06, 2008 10:01 pm
No new posts Probability Question dumont Probability 0 Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:38 pm
No new posts Question about exponention WingDragon@gmail.com Math 2 Fri Jul 21, 2006 8:13 am
No new posts question on solartron 1260 carrie_yao@hotmail.com Electrochem 0 Fri Jul 21, 2006 7:11 am
No new posts A Combinatorics/Graph Theory Question mathlover Undergraduate 1 Wed Jul 19, 2006 11:30 pm

Kaimo Turizmas | Loans | Health Insurance | Mobile Phone | Mortgage Loans
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Electronics forum |  Medicine forum |  Unix/Linux blog |  Unix/Linux documentation |  Unix/Linux forums


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.1841s ][ Queries: 16 (0.0851s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]