Author 
Message 
Biba science forum beginner
Joined: 14 Feb 2006
Posts: 4

Posted: Mon May 29, 2006 9:09 am Post subject:
Re: Simple Proof



Mike Terry wrote:
How about just:
Quote: 
=1P(A)P(B)+P(A)P(B) # INDEPENDENT EVENTS
=(1P(A))(1P(B))
=P(A^c)P(B^c)

Sure, I just wanted to write down every step of the proof, in details. 

Back to top 


Mike Terry science forum Guru Wannabe
Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 137

Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 2:07 pm Post subject:
Re: Simple Proof



<VijaKhara@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1148785192.053586.65810@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Quote:  Hi there, the following is his proof:
It goes like this:
A^c  complement of A
B^c  complement of B
A+B  union of A and B (not necesserly disjoint)
P(A+B)=P(A)+P(B)P(AB)
Then you have:
P(A^cB^c)=1P(A+B)

=1P(A)P(B)+P(AB) # as you note below
=1P(A)P(B)+P(A)P(B) # INDEPENDENT EVENTS
Quote:  =1P(A)P(B)+P(A)P(B)
=1(1P(A^c))(1P(B^c))+(1P(A^c))(1P(B^c))
=11+P(A^c)1+P(B^c)+1P(B^c)P(A^c)+P(A^c)P(B^c)
=P(A^c)P(B^c)

The above is correct but maybe over complex? How about just:
=1P(A)P(B)+P(A)P(B) # INDEPENDENT EVENTS
=(1P(A))(1P(B))
=P(A^c)P(B^c)
Mike.
Quote: 
which proves the claim.
Thanks
Mike Terry wrote:
VijaKhara@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1148768450.895960.84020@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Well, I know I am wrong but I cannot find out what is my wrong point.
To me , in Biba's proof, he doesn't use anything relating to the
assumtion that A and B are independent.
In BIBA's proof:
P(A+B)=P(A)+P(B)P(AB) this identity holds for every events.
P(A^cB^c)=1P(A+B) This holds because of De Morgan's law:
A^cB^c=(A+B)^c for all events
Plz Figure out where Biba used the assumtion that A and B are
independent to come to the result!
Thanks
Please quote Biba's proof and we might be able to help you!
Mike.



Back to top 


VijaKhara@gmail.com science forum beginner
Joined: 30 Sep 2005
Posts: 26

Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 2:59 am Post subject:
Re: Simple Proof



Hi there, the following is his proof:
It goes like this:
A^c  complement of A
B^c  complement of B
A+B  union of A and B (not necesserly disjoint)
P(A+B)=P(A)+P(B)P(AB)
Then you have:
P(A^cB^c)=1P(A+B)
=1P(A)P(B)+P(A)P(B)
=1(1P(A^c))(1P(B^c))+(1P(A^c))(1P(B^c))
=11+P(A^c)1+P(B^c)+1P(B^c)P(A^c)+P(A^c)P(B^c)
=P(A^c)P(B^c)
which proves the claim.
Thanks
Mike Terry wrote:
Quote:  VijaKhara@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1148768450.895960.84020@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Well, I know I am wrong but I cannot find out what is my wrong point.
To me , in Biba's proof, he doesn't use anything relating to the
assumtion that A and B are independent.
In BIBA's proof:
P(A+B)=P(A)+P(B)P(AB) this identity holds for every events.
P(A^cB^c)=1P(A+B) This holds because of De Morgan's law:
A^cB^c=(A+B)^c for all events
Plz Figure out where Biba used the assumtion that A and B are
independent to come to the result!
Thanks
Please quote Biba's proof and we might be able to help you!
Mike. 


Back to top 


Mike Terry science forum Guru Wannabe
Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 137

Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 12:13 am Post subject:
Re: Simple Proof



<VijaKhara@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1148768450.895960.84020@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Quote:  Well, I know I am wrong but I cannot find out what is my wrong point.
To me , in Biba's proof, he doesn't use anything relating to the
assumtion that A and B are independent.
In BIBA's proof:
P(A+B)=P(A)+P(B)P(AB) this identity holds for every events.
P(A^cB^c)=1P(A+B) This holds because of De Morgan's law:
A^cB^c=(A+B)^c for all events
Plz Figure out where Biba used the assumtion that A and B are
independent to come to the result!
Thanks

Please quote Biba's proof and we might be able to help you!
Mike. 

Back to top 


VijaKhara@gmail.com science forum beginner
Joined: 30 Sep 2005
Posts: 26

Posted: Sat May 27, 2006 10:20 pm Post subject:
Re: Simple Proof



Well, I know I am wrong but I cannot find out what is my wrong point.
To me , in Biba's proof, he doesn't use anything relating to the
assumtion that A and B are independent.
In BIBA's proof:
P(A+B)=P(A)+P(B)P(AB) this identity holds for every events.
P(A^cB^c)=1P(A+B) This holds because of De Morgan's law:
A^cB^c=(A+B)^c for all events
Plz Figure out where Biba used the assumtion that A and B are
independent to come to the result!
Thanks 

Back to top 


Jonas science forum addict
Joined: 08 Sep 2005
Posts: 77

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 1:46 pm Post subject:
Re: Simple Proof



What I previously wrote was wrong. Please disregard it. 

Back to top 


Jonas science forum addict
Joined: 08 Sep 2005
Posts: 77

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 1:11 pm Post subject:
Re: Simple Proof



This helps very much so. Thanks for your help. I see where I made my
mistake. I think that the proof you give below can be shortened by
saying that the step after the second could be 1[P(A+B)] then it can
be said that P[(AB)^c].
Biba wrote:
Quote:  It goes like this:
A^c  complement of A
B^c  complement of B
A+B  union of A and B (not necesserly disjoint)
P(A+B)=P(A)+P(B)P(AB)
Then you have:
P(A^cB^c)=1P(A+B)
=1P(A)P(B)+P(A)P(B)
=1(1P(A^c))(1P(B^c))+(1P(A^c))(1P(B^c))
=11+P(A^c)1+P(B^c)+1P(B^c)P(A^c)+P(A^c)P(B^c)
=P(A^c)P(B^c)
which proves the claim.
I hope it helps 


Back to top 


Biba science forum beginner
Joined: 14 Feb 2006
Posts: 4

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 7:46 am Post subject:
Re: Simple Proof



It goes like this:
A^c  complement of A
B^c  complement of B
A+B  union of A and B (not necesserly disjoint)
P(A+B)=P(A)+P(B)P(AB)
Then you have:
P(A^cB^c)=1P(A+B)
=1P(A)P(B)+P(A)P(B)
=1(1P(A^c))(1P(B^c))+(1P(A^c))(1P(B^c))
=11+P(A^c)1+P(B^c)+1P(B^c)P(A^c)+P(A^c)P(B^c)
=P(A^c)P(B^c)
which proves the claim.
I hope it helps 

Back to top 


Jonas science forum addict
Joined: 08 Sep 2005
Posts: 77

Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 12:52 am Post subject:
Simple Proof



I am doing a bit of independent study for the first actuarial exam.
The textbook that I have asks that I prove that the complement of A and
B are independent if A and B are independent. I started out with the
following:
I want to show that the probability of the complement of A times the
complement of B is equal to the probability of the intercept of the
complement of A and B. Pr(\A)*Pr(\B)=Pr(\(AB))
[1Pr(A)]*[1Pr(B)]
1Pr(A)Pr(B)+Pr(A)Pr(B)
1Pr(A)Pr(B)+Pr(AB)
I am stuck at this point. If I were to have 1Pr(AB), in the last
step, I would be done. I can't figuere out where I am making my
mistake.
I also tried working with the notation for conditional probability to
prove that the complements are independent but I had no success.
Any good hints or suggestions that you can give would be much
appreciated. 

Back to top 


Google


Back to top 


