"The Einstein Hoax"

Kalb · science forum beginner Joined: 22 May 2006 Posts: 26

"The Einstein Hoax"

"The Einstein Hoax" was written to counter an intellectual "fast
shuffle" which used Dr. Einstein's Special Relativity (which is easily seen
to be a mathematical copy of the earlier Lorentz Transformations Aether
Theory) to propagate the idea that our physical reality was too subtle to be
understood by mortal men and could only be dealt with using sophisticated
mathematics. This ploy served the academic community very well. The quote
was made that Dr. Einstein's principle contribution was not Special
Relativity but rather the showing that mathematics could used to make
advances in the physical sciences and "it was no longer necessary to wait
for "the few great minds that arise in each century" to make progress. Since
the availability of such intelligent men could not be expanded but
mathematics can be taught to anyone, the approach not only made the physical
sciences more mysterious, but allowed an unlimited expansion of the
contributing scientific community.

The phenomena associated with both Special and General Relativity seem,
to a large degree, to be incomprehensible and the conclusions contradictory.
There is a simple reason for this. The explanations which are provided lead
the mind to recognize inherent contradictions which are not apparent in the
mathematics. Since the contradictions do not appear in the mathematics it
was considered obvious that did not exist! These contradictions have led to
the continuous confusion appearing in the Newsgroups and elsewhere. The
reality is that, when an expert(s) cannot explain his(their) knowledge to an
intelligent layman (laymen), there can only be one explanation. The
expert(s) do not actually understand their subject matter. IT IS NOT BECAUSE
OF THE LIMITATIONJS OF THE LAYMEN.

"The Einstein Hoax", http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm, provides an
understanding of our physical reality which is in agreement with all known
physical observations and mathematical logic and , most importantly, pass
the "intelligent layman" test. The chapters of "The Einstein Hoax" are
listed below:

Chapter Titles

1. - Introduction
2. - Historical Background
3. - The Nature of the Einstein Hoax
4. - Does the Aether Exist?
5. - The Resurrection of Absolute Velocity by Quantum Experiments
6. - The Nature of Reality
7. - Applying the Lorentz Transformations Properly
8. - Generating the Gravity Transformations
9. - Dr. Einstein's Error and the Introduction of Curved Space
10. - Gravitational Contraction and Collapse
11. - Gravitational Collapse and the Creation of a Universe
12. - The Space Time Continuum
13. - The Nature of Particles
14. - Adding Quantum Effects to Our Understanding
15. - Changing the Paradigms
16. - What Can We Conclude?

There are 57,000 words and 53 illustrations.

The source material for this posting may be found in
http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm/ (1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE ACCEPT AS TRUE
MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS TRUE, IT MUST BE
CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE.
PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED
TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS
STATUS.

All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at
http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.

Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

E-mail:- einsteinhoax@isp.com. If you wish a reply, be sure that your
mail reception is not blocked.

The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided.

JoeT · science forum beginner Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 6

Dear Kalb: You may remember that we have discussions sometime ago
regarding "aether". We both agree that aether should exist but disagree
on whether the atmospheric neutrinos is the aether scientists have been
looking for centuries. Significant progress has been made on this
subject since then and I have been posting them in some physics and
science discussiom groups (Epistemology, Academy Olympia, PhysicsWorld,
Physics.reality) under my nick name JoeT.

You may be interested in reading them and commenting on them. After
all, like all science lovers we both are looking for the only real
science, which must be consistent throughout, supported by all
experimental findings, and sure making common sense.

Hope that you agree with that physics of mechanics is the only real
science since it is the only part of the physics that has been
repeatedly proven correct in the past four centuries and has no
unproved postulation for a long time.

I do agree with many of your scientific views. However, it seems that
you do support some of the mathematically derived "science" such as
electromagnetic wave, Lorentz Transformations of space and time, force
field theory, Einstein Equation, etc, while against some others. In
physics of mechanics, mathematics is only a quantification tool and
does not play a role in deriving (discovering) new science since all
phenoma are produced by objects (having masses and relative motions),
which can not be mathematical equations.

Physics of mechanics contradicts with all "no-aether theories. Only one
of them can be the real science.

JoeT

Leonard Abbott · science forum addict Joined: 06 Jun 2005 Posts: 57

Riemann's concepts milestone in the decline of ''Western Civilization'

Group: sci.physics.relativity Date: Sun, May 28, 2006, 9:58pm From:
leonard-abbott@webtv.net (Leonard Abbott)
Riemann's concepts milestone in the decline of ''Western Civilization'
Europe reached its Zenith, with industrialization, The Renaissance,
Reformation. inventions of the telescope and the printing press,
When most the reformers left for the New World, The Renaissance
ended, The Aristocracy and the Church reverted to their old wicked ways
of oppressing the population.
Because of the oppression the public wanted something other than corrupt
religion in their lives.
Riemann like all mathematicians before him struggled with the infinity
of the universe. because infinity can not be Expressed with didgets or
geometric designs.
To cheat a little bit, Rimann drew his straight lines into curved lines,
and made his parallel lines cross. other wise these lines would extend
beyond the edges of the paper, ruining his geometric model of the
universe .
The public fell for it, opening a Pandora's box, plunging Europe back
into the Dark ages. Where Mathematicians led the people,by what they
wanted to hear, rather than offering some kind of proof or even some
kind of evidence.
As the new Atheist movement progressed for the next 75 yrs the movement
evolved into Communism, Fascism and Nazism.
Jews tended to become Communists, while Catholics preferred Fascism and
Nazism.
len

JoeT · science forum beginner Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 6

Do you play games? You must obey the rules of the games to play
otherwise you are out. Science is a unique game since its rules are not
man-made but by the nature. In the kindom of science there can be only
one correct scientific answer and therefore no contradiction is
allowed. Scientific knowledge therefore is accumulative and must be
consistent too. How to determine what is real science? simple, only
real science can stand out supported by all experimental findings and
observations accumulated over the past several centuries. It happened
that Germany was right in supporting physics of mechanics. However,
their method was wrong. They had to disprove Einstein's theories
scientifically instead of trying to kill him, for example. Politics
should not play a rule in science. As a result, we won the war but lost
our science (in physics). Unfortunately, science is the only game of
the nature. To play, we must find nature's rules experimentally.
Mathematics is an important tool in science for quantification purposes
but it is not science.For exmple, light and gravity are not scientific
equations.

JoeT

Google