FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics » Relativity
Is there anything everyone can agree on in this group?
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 2 [22 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Goto page:  1, 2 Next
Author Message
Too Many Kooks Spoil the
science forum Guru


Joined: 30 Apr 2005
Posts: 402

PostPosted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 9:16 am    Post subject: Is there anything everyone can agree on in this group? Reply with quote

Sorry, just feeling humorous!

(Feel free to dissent, if you wish.)
Back to top
Y.Porat
science forum Guru


Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 1809

PostPosted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 11:54 am    Post subject: Re: Is there anything everyone can agree on in this group? Reply with quote

Joe Jakarta wrote:
Quote:
Sorry, just feeling humorous!

(Feel free to dissent, if you wish.)
-------------------

yes
there is a wide agreement about lots of things .........
*provided*................
that you belong to the rigth gang (:-)


ATB
Y.Porat
-----------------------------
Back to top
Igor
science forum Guru


Joined: 15 May 2005
Posts: 315

PostPosted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:59 pm    Post subject: Re: Is there anything everyone can agree on in this group? Reply with quote

Why Poor Rat wrote:
Quote:
Joe Jakarta wrote:
Sorry, just feeling humorous!

(Feel free to dissent, if you wish.)
-------------------
yes
there is a wide agreement about lots of things .........
*provided*................
that you belong to the rigth gang (:-)


Provided you actually have a brain and use it once in awhile.
Back to top
Henri Wilson
science forum Guru


Joined: 08 May 2005
Posts: 3381

PostPosted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:26 am    Post subject: Re: Is there anything everyone can agree on in this group? Reply with quote

On 13 Jun 2006 02:16:45 -0700, "Joe Jakarta" <brightice2001@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

Quote:
Sorry, just feeling humorous!

(Feel free to dissent, if you wish.)

We CAN certainly agree that Einstein was a hoaxer....but the SRian baboon
brigade has the religious conviction of a suicide bomber and will never concede
that its belief system has been wrong, all along.


HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Appropriate message snipping is considerate and painless.
Back to top
PD
science forum Guru


Joined: 03 May 2005
Posts: 4363

PostPosted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:52 am    Post subject: Re: Is there anything everyone can agree on in this group? Reply with quote

Henri Wilson wrote:
Quote:
On 13 Jun 2006 02:16:45 -0700, "Joe Jakarta" <brightice2001@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

Sorry, just feeling humorous!

(Feel free to dissent, if you wish.)

We CAN certainly agree that Einstein was a hoaxer....but the SRian baboon
brigade has the religious conviction of a suicide bomber and will never concede
that its belief system has been wrong, all along.


Who's "We", Henri? Talking amongst your various selves, are you?

As for conceding, Henri, the way scientists decide which conviction is
"wrong, all along", is to look at experiment.

This seems to be anathema to you. You'd sooner put your face into a
plate of hungry cockroaches than to let experiment decide whether your
"logic" and "acceptance of certain principles" has been wrong, all
along.

PD
Back to top
Sorcerer
science forum Guru


Joined: 09 Jun 2006
Posts: 410

PostPosted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 10:34 am    Post subject: Re: Is there anything everyone can agree on in this group? Reply with quote

"PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1150966372.066828.267500@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
|
| Henri Wilson wrote:
| > On 13 Jun 2006 02:16:45 -0700, "Joe Jakarta" <brightice2001@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
| >
| > >Sorry, just feeling humorous!
| > >
| > >(Feel free to dissent, if you wish.)
| >
| > We CAN certainly agree that Einstein was a hoaxer....but the SRian
baboon
| > brigade has the religious conviction of a suicide bomber and will never
concede
| > that its belief system has been wrong, all along.
| >
|
| Who's "We", Henri?

Myself and Henri are "we", but I would use the word "huckster".
You are not included in "we".
Henri and I are not included in "our" theory, as in "the velocity of light
in ***our*** theory plays the part, physically, of an infinitely great
velocity.
You are included in "our" theory because you are a shithead.
Androcles
Back to top
PD
science forum Guru


Joined: 03 May 2005
Posts: 4363

PostPosted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 2:09 pm    Post subject: Re: Is there anything everyone can agree on in this group? Reply with quote

Sorcerer wrote:
Quote:
"PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1150966372.066828.267500@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
|
| Henri Wilson wrote:
| > On 13 Jun 2006 02:16:45 -0700, "Joe Jakarta" <brightice2001@yahoo.co.uk
wrote:
|
| > >Sorry, just feeling humorous!
|
| > >(Feel free to dissent, if you wish.)
|
| > We CAN certainly agree that Einstein was a hoaxer....but the SRian
baboon
| > brigade has the religious conviction of a suicide bomber and will never
concede
| > that its belief system has been wrong, all along.
|
|
| Who's "We", Henri?

Myself and Henri are "we", but I would use the word "huckster".

Ah yes, the two of you. Good set of "we".

Quote:
You are not included in "we".

It's the small blessings, isn't it?

Quote:
Henri and I are not included in "our" theory, as in "the velocity of light
in ***our*** theory plays the part, physically, of an infinitely great
velocity.
You are included in "our" theory because you are a shithead.
Androcles
Back to top
Sorcerer
science forum Guru


Joined: 09 Jun 2006
Posts: 410

PostPosted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 7:47 pm    Post subject: Re: Is there anything everyone can agree on in this group? Reply with quote

"PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1150985381.914133.126070@y41g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...
|
| Sorcerer wrote:
| > "PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message
| > news:1150966372.066828.267500@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
| > |
| > | Henri Wilson wrote:
| > | > On 13 Jun 2006 02:16:45 -0700, "Joe Jakarta"
<brightice2001@yahoo.co.uk>
| > wrote:
| > | >
| > | > >Sorry, just feeling humorous!
| > | > >
| > | > >(Feel free to dissent, if you wish.)
| > | >
| > | > We CAN certainly agree that Einstein was a hoaxer....but the SRian
| > baboon
| > | > brigade has the religious conviction of a suicide bomber and will
never
| > concede
| > | > that its belief system has been wrong, all along.
| > | >
| > |
| > | Who's "We", Henri?
| >
| > Myself and Henri are "we", but I would use the word "huckster".
|
| Ah yes, the two of you. Good set of "we".
|
| > You are not included in "we".
|
| It's the small blessings, isn't it?
|
| > Henri and I are not included in "our" theory, as in "the velocity of
light
| > in ***our*** theory plays the part, physically, of an infinitely great
| > velocity.
| > You are included in "our" theory because you are a shithead.

Which you are unable to deny.
The dull-minded prey have always outnumbered the intelligent predator.
Sheep you are, and in sheep's clothing too. Wolf you are not. Idiot
cunts like you who divide-by-zero will always be prey to hucksters like
Einstein.
It's about m.o.n.e.y, shithead, but I know you are too stupid to see that.
Androcles.
Back to top
xray4abc
science forum addict


Joined: 02 Jun 2005
Posts: 61

PostPosted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:01 pm    Post subject: Re: Is there anything everyone can agree on in this group? Reply with quote

Joe Jakarta wrote:

Is there anything everyone can agree on in this group?
................

Yes! And that, is :
There is nothing everyone can agree on in this group !

LL
Back to top
Eric Gisse
science forum Guru


Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 1999

PostPosted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 8:25 pm    Post subject: Re: Is there anything everyone can agree on in this group? Reply with quote

Henri Wilson wrote:
Quote:
On 13 Jun 2006 02:16:45 -0700, "Joe Jakarta" <brightice2001@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

Sorry, just feeling humorous!

(Feel free to dissent, if you wish.)

We CAN certainly agree that Einstein was a hoaxer....but the SRian baboon
brigade has the religious conviction of a suicide bomber and will never concede
that its belief system has been wrong, all along.

When you say "we", you mean Androcles and yourself. Unfortunately, the
both of you cannot demonstrate any actual understanding of the theories
you criticise.

Were I to give the both of you a simple relativity problem, neither of
you would be able to solve it.

Quote:


HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Appropriate message snipping is considerate and painless.
Back to top
Henri Wilson
science forum Guru


Joined: 08 May 2005
Posts: 3381

PostPosted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 10:52 pm    Post subject: Re: Is there anything everyone can agree on in this group? Reply with quote

On 22 Jun 2006 13:25:57 -0700, "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote:

Quote:

Henri Wilson wrote:
On 13 Jun 2006 02:16:45 -0700, "Joe Jakarta" <brightice2001@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

Sorry, just feeling humorous!

(Feel free to dissent, if you wish.)

We CAN certainly agree that Einstein was a hoaxer....but the SRian baboon
brigade has the religious conviction of a suicide bomber and will never concede
that its belief system has been wrong, all along.

When you say "we", you mean Androcles and yourself. Unfortunately, the
both of you cannot demonstrate any actual understanding of the theories
you criticise.

Were I to give the both of you a simple relativity problem, neither of
you would be able to solve it.

There are far more people on this NG oposing Einstein than there are for him.

What is more, they make good scientific contributions as opposed to the
repetitive religious preaching of the SRian baboon brigade.

Quote:



HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Appropriate message snipping is considerate and painless.


HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Appropriate message snipping is considerate and painless.
Back to top
PD
science forum Guru


Joined: 03 May 2005
Posts: 4363

PostPosted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 11:38 pm    Post subject: Re: Is there anything everyone can agree on in this group? Reply with quote

Henri Wilson wrote:
Quote:
On 22 Jun 2006 13:25:57 -0700, "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote:


Henri Wilson wrote:
On 13 Jun 2006 02:16:45 -0700, "Joe Jakarta" <brightice2001@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

Sorry, just feeling humorous!

(Feel free to dissent, if you wish.)

We CAN certainly agree that Einstein was a hoaxer....but the SRian baboon
brigade has the religious conviction of a suicide bomber and will never concede
that its belief system has been wrong, all along.

When you say "we", you mean Androcles and yourself. Unfortunately, the
both of you cannot demonstrate any actual understanding of the theories
you criticise.

Were I to give the both of you a simple relativity problem, neither of
you would be able to solve it.

There are far more people on this NG oposing Einstein than there are for him.

That means nothing. There are far more patients than caretakes at an
asylum. Do not imagine that this ng is representative of anything,
other than possibly a popular refuse can for those who do not know how
to pursue science any other way.

Quote:

What is more, they make good scientific contributions as opposed to the
repetitive religious preaching of the SRian baboon brigade.


You seem to have a ridiculous notion of what a good scientific
contribution is. You are not alone in that -- there are many screwy
ideas of what a good scientific contribution is.
"Being original is better than being right."
"Experiments are for trained idiots. The real creative scientific work
is done by those who are not trained in the scientific method."
"Logic and common sense determine scientific truth. Experiments can
always be fudged."
"I can't derive the math. Someone else will have to do that. I just
assume that all that math of SR is still somehow correct, but my
explanation is infinitely better."
"I'm restoring the sanity of the familiar to physics, which has gotten
lost in arcanery."

Quote:



HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Appropriate message snipping is considerate and painless.


HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Appropriate message snipping is considerate and painless.
Back to top
Eric Gisse
science forum Guru


Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 1999

PostPosted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 11:43 pm    Post subject: Re: Is there anything everyone can agree on in this group? Reply with quote

Henri Wilson wrote:
Quote:
On 22 Jun 2006 13:25:57 -0700, "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote:


Henri Wilson wrote:
On 13 Jun 2006 02:16:45 -0700, "Joe Jakarta" <brightice2001@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

Sorry, just feeling humorous!

(Feel free to dissent, if you wish.)

We CAN certainly agree that Einstein was a hoaxer....but the SRian baboon
brigade has the religious conviction of a suicide bomber and will never concede
that its belief system has been wrong, all along.

When you say "we", you mean Androcles and yourself. Unfortunately, the
both of you cannot demonstrate any actual understanding of the theories
you criticise.

Were I to give the both of you a simple relativity problem, neither of
you would be able to solve it.

There are far more people on this NG oposing Einstein than there are for him.

Yet none of you can agree on why.

Quote:

What is more, they make good scientific contributions as opposed to the
repetitive religious preaching of the SRian baboon brigade.

What scientific contributions?

Quote:




HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Appropriate message snipping is considerate and painless.


HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Appropriate message snipping is considerate and painless.
Back to top
dda1
science forum Guru


Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Posts: 762

PostPosted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 11:55 pm    Post subject: Re: Is there anything everyone can agree on in this group? Reply with quote

King Imbecile Henri Wilson wrote:

<he,he, snipped.

f*** off cretin.
Back to top
Phineas T Puddleduck
science forum Guru


Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Posts: 759

PostPosted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 11:56 pm    Post subject: Re: Is there anything everyone can agree on in this group? Reply with quote

In article <1151020513.029492.241370@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>,
dda1 <rangeravenger@yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
King Imbecile Henri Wilson wrote:

he,he, snipped.

f*** off cretin.


Now there's something I can agree with dda1, problem is he won't...

--
The greatest enemy of science is pseudoscience.

Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.

Official emperor of sci.physics. Please pay no attention to my butt poking
forward, it is expanding.

Relf's Law?
"Bullshit repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 2 [22 Posts] Goto page:  1, 2 Next
View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Sat Jan 10, 2009 2:12 am | All times are GMT
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics » Relativity
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts Basic question on Homology group Meg Weiss Math 3 Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:00 pm
No new posts Fundamental region for the modular group Timothy Murphy Math 5 Mon Jul 17, 2006 8:32 pm
No new posts Mathieu Group M12 PaulHjelmstad Math 8 Mon Jul 17, 2006 2:21 pm
No new posts [Group Theory] Normal => Characteristic trivecteur Math 5 Sun Jul 16, 2006 2:12 pm
No new posts Finite # of subgroups -> Finite group tppytel@gmail.com Undergraduate 9 Sun Jul 16, 2006 1:47 am

Apartment Budapest | Submit articles | Property in Russia | Refinance | Fast Loans
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Electronics forum |  Medicine forum |  Unix/Linux blog |  Unix/Linux documentation |  Unix/Linux forums


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.2840s ][ Queries: 16 (0.1510s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]