FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics » Research
CCR and unitary evolution
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [2 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Arkadiusz Jadczyk
science forum beginner


Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 21

PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:05 pm    Post subject: Re: CCR and unitary evolution Reply with quote

On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 20:48:29 +0000 (UTC), bryant_j_j@yahoo.com wrote:

Quote:
Hi all,

Suppose we have a closed quantum mechanical system which evolves (in
the Heisenberg picture) such that all the required canonical
commutation relations (e.g., [p(t),q(t)]=i\hbar ) are satisfied for all
t >=0. Is the associated evolution necessarily unitary (we don't know
the exact evolution, but only that the commutation relation holds for
all time)? If so, which result states this, and if not are there
counter examples to this?

TIA.

JJ
The devil is inthe details. p and q are unbounded operators, and there

are known pathological examples of p,q pairs formally satisfying
CCR but not unitarily equivalent to the Schrodinger pair.

If you replace CCR by its Weyl's form - then the answer is yes, by the
von Neumann uniqueness theorem. But if you are desperate and ready to
deal with pathological domains - then you can find counterexamples.

More information in Gerard G Emch, "Algebraic methods in statistical
mechanics and quantum filed theory", Ch. 3 and C. R. Putnam,
"Commutation properies of Hilbert space operators and related topics",
Ch. 4.

ark
--

Arkadiusz Jadczyk
http://quantumfuture.net/quantum_future/jadpub.htm
--
Back to top
bryant_j_j@yahoo.com
science forum beginner


Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 8:48 pm    Post subject: CCR and unitary evolution Reply with quote

Hi all,

Suppose we have a closed quantum mechanical system which evolves (in
the Heisenberg picture) such that all the required canonical
commutation relations (e.g., [p(t),q(t)]=i\hbar ) are satisfied for all
t >=0. Is the associated evolution necessarily unitary (we don't know
the exact evolution, but only that the commutation relation holds for
all time)? If so, which result states this, and if not are there
counter examples to this?

TIA.

JJ
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [2 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Wed Oct 18, 2017 4:51 pm | All times are GMT
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics » Research
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts Unitary Matrix group - not Hauke Reddmann Math 1 Mon Jul 10, 2006 9:06 am
No new posts Cathodic reaction hydrogen evolution on RDE Dr noone Electrochem 0 Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:41 pm
No new posts BIG SHOVEL REMOVES EVOLUTION CRAP Ed Conrad Chem 0 Sun May 28, 2006 12:47 am
No new posts WITH THOSE GOO GOO GOOGLE Y EYES -- Sleazeball Science Si... Ed Conrad Chem 0 Wed May 24, 2006 12:37 pm
No new posts THE EVOLUTION OF EINSTEIN'S ZOMBIES Pentcho Valev Relativity 6 Mon May 22, 2006 5:53 am

Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Electronics forum |  Medicine forum |  Unix/Linux blog |  Unix/Linux documentation |  Unix/Linux forums  |  send newsletters
 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.0176s ][ Queries: 20 (0.0033s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]