"The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"

Yad · science forum beginner Joined: 20 Nov 2005 Posts: 31

"The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"

Observations made in the field of Quantum Physics have already
established that the concept that space and time are different aspects of
the same entity - "space-time" is flawed. This concept was based on the
recognition that the Lorentz Transformations resulting from velocity and our
inability to transmit information faster than the velocity of light made it
impossible to establish our absolute velocity through space observationally.
Physicists who were more enamored with mathematical elegance than with
establishing a better understanding of the way the Universe works extended
that impossibility to generate the belief that an absolute velocity did not
exist! This leads to logical contradictions, as Dr. Einstein recognized
instinctively, causing him to resist the idea of "space-time" for about 25
years after the publication of Special Relativity and asserting that the
"space-time" concept required the existence of an infinite number of
Aethers!

Lately, Quantum physicist have made observations which demonstrate
that, of the two current explanations of quantum theory, the one which
requires that the velocity of propagation of quantum effects be infinite
velocity rather than being limited to the velocity of light, is consistent
with the results of observation. Experiments have shown that the velocity of
the coupling of the polarization angle (the quantum number of the photon) of
"paired photons" occurs at a velocity of at least four times the velocity of
light and perhaps at an infinite velocity. Such a coupling velocity prevents
physicists from hiding behind the idea that there is no absolute velocity
reference frame and forcibly re-establishes the idea of Aether and
demolishes the idea of "space-time" as other than as a conventional
mathematical abstraction.

The idea that information can travel at a velocity greater than the
velocity of light is not inconsistent with the requirements of Special
Relativity. If one examines all of the conventional means of transmission of
information one finds that they involve the transmission of energy (e.g.-
light signals, radio signals, particle transmission, etc). If one examines
the Lorentz Transformation for energy (F-L-T system of units), one finds
that the units of energy are the product of the Lorentz Transformations
Force and for Length. Since the Lorentz Transformation for Force (on axis)
is unity, the Lorentz Transformation for Energy is equal to the
Transformation for Length and is 1/(1-V^2/C^2)^0.5). This transformation
becomes infinite at the velocity of light and becomes imaginary at
velocities above the velocity of light. Clearly, no observable process which
involves energy can proceed faster than the velocity of light!

The limitation imposed on the velocity of energy propagation does not
apply to the velocity of propagation of the polarization angle of "paired
photons". Since changing the polarization angle of a photon does not change
its energy content, the limitation that Special Relativity imposes on the
transmission of energy does not apply. To see how Special Relativity does
impose a velocity limitation on the propagations of the polarization angle
of "paired photons" one must apply the Lorentz Transformation for Angle to
the problem. Angle is measured as the length along an arc divided by the
radius of that arc. As a result, the Lorentz Transformation for Angle is
(1-V^2/C^2)/(1-V^2/C^2), and is equal to unity at all velocities between
+/-C! A simple calculus procedure shows that the Transformation for Angle
remains unity even at the velocity of light, where the Transformation for
Energy becomes Infinite!. Unlike the Transformation for Energy, at
velocities above that of light, the Transformation for Angle does not become
imaginary. It retains its value of unity for all velocities. From this it
seems reasonable to conclude that the velocity limit for the propagation of
polarization angle of such photons is infinity. It is the writer's belief
that this results applies to all quantum numbers and that the current
interpretation of Quantum Theory which asserts that quantum effects must
pervade through all of space at an infinite velocity is the correct one.
(The alternative idea, that alternate universes co-existing in the same
space would seem to be a concept that is so absurd that it seems reasonable
to wonder how much LSD its adherents absorbed during their college years.)

Quite significant is the fact that the original "big bang" fireball
from which our Universe is believed to have begun has been observed. We know
its location and we know our velocity with respect to it. As a result we
have actually observed our "absolute velocity" through space. Since this is
impossible under the "space-time" concept, we seem to be forced back to the
Lorentz Transformation - Aether Theory!

When one recognizes that information CAN propagate at a velocity
significantly greater that the velocity of light, the idea of a "ABSOLUTE
TIME" cannot be dismissed, just as the idea cannot be dismissed by those who
consider the virtually instantaneously travel between locations using
"wormholes". A successful use of a "wormhole" in this manner would also
effectively establish "ABSOLUTE SIMULTANIETY". Unfortunately for the
intellectual status quo, "ABSOLUTE TIME" requires that the special case
solution of Special Relativity represented by the Lorentz-Transformation
Aether Theory represent our reality. The mathematical abstraction of
space-time is just that, an abstraction which makes the computations of
velocity effects easier, it has no physical significance. Nature doesn't
actually give a damn about the abstractions we use to make computations
simpler, it does care, however, about the useful function that the classical
Aether performs. (Dr. Einstein is reported to have held on to the belief in
absolute time, identical to a belief in the Aether theory, for 25 years
after he published Special Relativity and to have warned "remember
gentlemen, we have not proven that the Aether does not exist, we have merely
proven that we do not need it for computations.) We have reached a point
where the existence of the Aether has been observationally proven though the
"paired photon" experiments. It is time for the mathematical idiot-savants
to step aside and let intelligent men attack the problem objectively without
fear of repression.

Recently, astronomers in Australia announced that they have observed
that the velocity of light in the early stages of the Universe was greater
than it is now. At present, their observations are considered to be errors
since the velocity of light is "known" to be constant. WRONG! The velocity
of light is "a constant" only when measured with local units of measurement.
It cannot be both constant and "a constant" unless the Lorentz
Transformations for length and time are either equal or are unity. THEY
AREN'T, they are reciprocal! In addition, cosmologists are struggling to
make sense of the apparent speeding up of the expansion of the Universe at
extreme distances from the original "fireball". It must be pointed out that
both these observations would result if the correct gravitational
transformations were employed, i.e- Force = 1 Length = 1/(1-$) and Time =
(1-$) instead of the erroneous ones which result from the naive error made
in the original derivation of General Relativity which was plastered over
with the fakery of "curved space". (There is no transformation for length in
General Relativity and the transformation for time provided by GR is
(1/(1+$). $ represents the term used by General Relativity for defining its
"time dilation".

It is puzzling as to why there is a search for a mysterious additional
repulsive force to explain the observed rate of expansion of the Universe.
The reason that this is puzzling is the fact that nowhere in the discussions
has the writer found that the radiation pressure of the 3K
background, and a possibly much large pressure caused by neutrinos, has been
taken into account. Since it is currently estimated that the energy
represented by that radiation is at least 10 times the energy present in the
matter contained in the Universe, it is easy to believe that the pressure
produced by the radiation can easily produce the required espansive force.
Is there proof that this is the case, probably not, but this source of
expansive force has not been included in the calculations. With this
viewpoint, the Universe would be analogous to a gas (radiation) filled
balloon containing a sprinkling of dust (matter). (An article in the March
2003 issue of Scientific American describes the Universe as just such a dist
filled gas-bag.)

If one examines the big bang observations one finds that they are
consistent with the Universe being formed within a gravitationally collapsed
object when the correct gravitational transformations are employed. Such an
object, as observed internally without accounting for the relativistically
changed size of the units of measurement, would collapse and then, when that
collapse had proceeded to a radius equal to four times the horizon radius,
would be observed to expand explosively at the beginning and then settle
down to a more moderate rate of expansion. In directions away from the
observed source of the expansion, the rate of that expansion should also
seem to be increasing due to the fact that we are also looking into the
past. These effects are to be expected from the application of the corrected
gravitational transformations to the problem. The effects described are
rigorously derived in "Gravity" at http://einsteinhoax,com/gravity.htm.

The source material for this posting may be found in
http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm/ (1997);
http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm (1987); and
http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm (1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE ACCEPT AS
TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS TRUE, IT
MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE MATHEMATICALLY
VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS
ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD
CLASS STATUS.

All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at
http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.

Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

E-mail:- einsteinhoax@isp.com. If you wish a reply, be sure that your
mail reception is not blocked.

The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided.

Google