FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » Science and Technology » Chem
Help with atmospheric water vapor partial pressure experiment.
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [4 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Dan Akers
science forum addict


Joined: 19 Jul 2005
Posts: 56

PostPosted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 11:40 pm    Post subject: Help with atmospheric water vapor partial pressure experiment. Reply with quote

In an attempt to "directly" measure (first principles) the partial
pressure of water vapor in air via a non-electronic or psychrometric
method, I have set up an apparatus consisting of a U- tube manometer and
a Salvason tube (I hope that's the correct terminology; it's a
relatively large, glass, cylindrical, test tube shaped device with an
open mouth at one end and a tubing nipple at the other; about 25cm tall,
2.5cm in diameter, with a total volume capacity of 410cc) The tubing
nipple of the Salvason tube is connected to one leg of the water
manometer; the other leg of the manometer is exposed to atmosphere. The
Salvason tube is half filled with pure water and then a piece of filter
paper (of the drip coffee filter variety) is pulled tight over the mouth
of the Salvason tube and secured with elastic bands. The tube is then
inverted (mouth down) and placed on a ring stand such that the now wet
filter paper is exposed to the breeze of a small muffin fan (blowing
upwards) located at the bottom of the ring stand. My idea is that the
steady state differential pressure of the filter paper, as indicated on
the manometer, (once the water column differential of the Salvason tube
is subtracted from the total indicated differential on the manometer)
will be equivalent to the difference between the saturation vapor
pressure at the prevailing dry bulb temperature (the liquid water in the
Salvason tube is at prevailing dry bulb temperature) and the prevailing
partial pressure of water vapor in the air in which the apparatus is
located. So far, my apparatus looks promising. Conditions are: Tair=25C,
RH=52%, Pwater vapor= 16.3cm H20, Psat H2O in Salveson=31.3 cm H20.
Target dP=31.3-16.3=15.0 cm H20. I get to within about 1.5 cm of water
column of my predicted, namely 15.0 cm of differential, before air (tiny
bubbles) starts to penetrate the filter membrane; stopping the partial
vacuum in the top of the Salvason from developing further. But the rate
trend, as I approach my 15.0 cm on the filter membrane seems to indicate
that I am on the right track, ie, the rate of pressure in the Salvason
drops more slowly (it follows that the evaporation rate from the surface
of the filter membrane also slows) as the 15.0 cm target is approached.
Is my thinking correct? If I could stop the air from crossing the filter
membrane, would the dP across the filter paper likely stabilize and be
equal to the difference between the saturation vapor pressure and the
prevailing partial pressure of water vapor in the air? In other words;
would evaporation from the filter paper cease?
Thanks for any constructive advice...
Dan Akers
Back to top
Uncle Al
science forum Guru


Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 1226

PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 12:53 am    Post subject: Re: Help with atmospheric water vapor partial pressure experiment. Reply with quote

D Akers wrote:
Quote:

In an attempt to "directly" measure (first principles) the partial
pressure of water vapor in air via a non-electronic or psychrometric
method, I have set up an apparatus consisting of a U- tube manometer and
a Salvason tube (I hope that's the correct terminology; it's a
relatively large, glass, cylindrical, test tube shaped device with an
open mouth at one end and a tubing nipple at the other; about 25cm tall,
2.5cm in diameter, with a total volume capacity of 410cc) The tubing
nipple of the Salvason tube is connected to one leg of the water
manometer; the other leg of the manometer is exposed to atmosphere. The
Salvason tube is half filled with pure water and then a piece of filter
paper (of the drip coffee filter variety) is pulled tight over the mouth
of the Salvason tube and secured with elastic bands. The tube is then
inverted (mouth down) and placed on a ring stand such that the now wet
filter paper is exposed to the breeze of a small muffin fan (blowing
upwards) located at the bottom of the ring stand. My idea is that the
steady state differential pressure of the filter paper, as indicated on
the manometer, (once the water column differential of the Salvason tube
is subtracted from the total indicated differential on the manometer)
will be equivalent to the difference between the saturation vapor
pressure at the prevailing dry bulb temperature (the liquid water in the
Salvason tube is at prevailing dry bulb temperature) and the prevailing
partial pressure of water vapor in the air in which the apparatus is
located. So far, my apparatus looks promising. Conditions are: Tair=25C,
RH=52%, Pwater vapor= 16.3cm H20, Psat H2O in Salveson=31.3 cm H20.
Target dP=31.3-16.3=15.0 cm H20. I get to within about 1.5 cm of water
column of my predicted, namely 15.0 cm of differential, before air (tiny
bubbles) starts to penetrate the filter membrane; stopping the partial
vacuum in the top of the Salvason from developing further. But the rate
trend, as I approach my 15.0 cm on the filter membrane seems to indicate
that I am on the right track, ie, the rate of pressure in the Salvason
drops more slowly (it follows that the evaporation rate from the surface
of the filter membrane also slows) as the 15.0 cm target is approached.
Is my thinking correct? If I could stop the air from crossing the filter
membrane, would the dP across the filter paper likely stabilize and be
equal to the difference between the saturation vapor pressure and the
prevailing partial pressure of water vapor in the air? In other words;
would evaporation from the filter paper cease?
Thanks for any constructive advice...
Dan Akers

Two mercury barometers and a thermometer. Compare one barometer to
the other. Introduce a known volume of water into one barometer tube
so it rises into Torricelli's vacuum. Read off the vapor pressure at
any ambient temp you choose.

You do know you can look up this stuff, yes? Or calculate it?

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz3.pdf
Back to top
Dan Akers
science forum addict


Joined: 19 Jul 2005
Posts: 56

PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:22 am    Post subject: Re: Help with atmospheric water vapor partial pressure experiment. Reply with quote

Uncle Al wrote:
"Two mercury barometers and a thermometer. Compare one barometer to the
other. Introduce a known volume of water into one barometer tube so it
rises into Torricelli's vacuum. Read off the vapor pressure at any
ambient temp you choose.
You do know you can look up this stuff, yes? Or calculate it?"
_____________________________________
Re;
Thanks for the reply Al, but that apparatus will not tell me the partial
pressure of water vapor in the air; at least as far as I can ascertain.
The difference between the two barometers will simply be the saturation
vapor pressure of water at the ambient temperature of the barometers.
Look up what? The current partial pressure of water vapor in the air in
my shop? Calculate it from what? That's what I'm trying to determine;
some parameters to work with from an apparatus such that the partial
pressure of water vapor in the air can be determined.
Yes, I know I could measure dew point with a cold plate and look up the
corresponding vapor pressure for that temperature OR use a sling
psychrometer etc. I am looking for a method a bit more "direct" than
that; the vapor pressure actually indicated as a pressure parameter.

Dan Akers
Back to top
Richard J Kinch
science forum beginner


Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 36

PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 7:12 am    Post subject: Re: Help with atmospheric water vapor partial pressure experiment. Reply with quote

D Akers writes:

Quote:
Is my thinking correct? If I could stop the air from crossing the filter
membrane, would the dP across the filter paper likely stabilize and be
equal to the difference between the saturation vapor pressure and the
prevailing partial pressure of water vapor in the air? In other words;
would evaporation from the filter paper cease?

Having trouble following your description, nor do I follow on what physical
principle you are isolating or differentiating vapor pressure of a certain
gas (water) or its analog.

It sounds like you are not measuring a differential between saturated vs
ambient vapor pressures at the ambient temp, but merely a change in the
captured vapor pressure due to the temperature drop in the system from
evaporation. Which is to say, a rather clumsy and uncalibrated wet-
bulb/dry-bulb psychrometer, something you were trying to avoid.
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [4 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:09 am | All times are GMT
Forum index » Science and Technology » Chem
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts Estimating the ammount of water relas... Jan Kalin Chem 7 Wed Jul 19, 2006 11:26 am
No new posts Prine Number thought experiment robert.w.adams@verizon.ne Math 1 Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:31 am
No new posts O-18 Water, surplus Clay Herzog Chem 2 Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:39 pm
No new posts de-ionised water = distilled water = ... beerismygas Chem 17 Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:29 pm
No new posts A Tale of Two Clocks: A Thought Exper... Titus Piezas III Relativity 7 Wed Jul 05, 2006 8:48 am

TurboTax | Personal Loans | MPAA | Remortgaging | MPAA
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Electronics forum |  Medicine forum |  Unix/Linux blog |  Unix/Linux documentation |  Unix/Linux forums


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.1909s ][ Queries: 16 (0.1099s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]