FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics » New Theories
A Quantum Philosophical Thesis
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 6 [78 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Goto page:  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
Author Message
G=EMC^2 Glazier
science forum Guru


Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Posts: 527

PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 1:56 pm    Post subject: Re: A Quantum Philosophical Thesis 10^-43 Seconds Before and after BB Reply with quote

A quantum spacetime of unknown laws. Never to be theorized,and never out
of humankinds psychotic energy of our brain. Always in our "id"
Bert
Back to top
dave hillstrom
science forum beginner


Joined: 12 Sep 2005
Posts: 33

PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 1:19 pm    Post subject: Re: A Quantum Philosophical Thesis Reply with quote

On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 03:13:18 GMT, line_voltage
<spammers.hell@verizon.net> wrote:

Quote:
Veronica Karlsson wrote:



Apparently most birds don't know how to count to more than one, and they
survive just fine.



chirp

and that goes for even the birds in new zealand i've heard from actual
kiwis, apart from this yellow-breasted warbling masturbator ...:_{D


chirp


chirp
chirp
chirp
chirp
chirp
burp

doesnt the yellow-breasted warbling masturbator go
<fwap><fwap><fwap><fwap><fwap><fwap><fwap><fwap><fwap><fwap> when it
tries to fly?

--
Dave Hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj
"I can't find my puppy, can you help me find him? I think he went
into this cheap motel room."
-Dave Hillstrom
Back to top
dave hillstrom
science forum beginner


Joined: 12 Sep 2005
Posts: 33

PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 1:12 pm    Post subject: Re: A Quantum Philosophical Thesis Reply with quote

On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 21:28:03 -0400, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
wrote:

Quote:
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 13:29:40 -0700, mikegordge wrote:


dave hillstrom wrote:

Nothing, nothing absolutely nothing at all about the subject of the
invented thread of the silly nonsense of inventing numbers, which
incidentally NO-ONE has explained what the f*** that is all about and
why and how man needs to know anything about it, but dave hillstrom,
(who obviously has such a low opinion of himself that he doesn't regard
his own name worthy of being capitalised), the trait of a socialist
masochist if ever there was, who chose instead to attack me personally
because I had appropriately responded to another leftist fuckwit who
was also attacking me and who also did so without one single referrence
to the subject.

What is it with these fucking clowns who hate their ideas being
challenged so much that the believe the only possible response is
attacking the challenger and not the challenge?

cough

I believe that was Dave's question to you.

psssst. mikes from the politics groups. he cant hear you now.

--
Dave Hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj
"I can't find my puppy, can you help me find him? I think he went
into this cheap motel room."
-Dave Hillstrom
Back to top
Shirley
science forum beginner


Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 4:04 am    Post subject: Re: A Quantum Philosophical Thesis Reply with quote

"line_voltage" <spammers.hell@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:HcIng.4543$Yk.1941@trnddc06...
Quote:
Shirley wrote:
"line_voltage" <spammers.hell@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:bywng.3438$il.2502@trnddc03...

mimus wrote:

On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 15:09:26 -0700, mikegordge wrote:



Smee wrote:



You are hereby fined 27 and one half points for obfuscation.

And you reckon saying *numbers dont exist in nature* isn't coming from
an obfuscated and seriously fucked up reason dead brain?


Try reading the OP again. No one said anything about numbers not
existing
in nature . . . .



raises hand

numbers do NOT exist in nature

bows


If numbers do not exist in nature then why during a bad year do some of
natures wildlife decrease their number of offspring by a certain amount?

because when you finally get right it's not quantity that matters, it's
quality

#:-{D


It's all in the numbers baby.... ;o}
Back to top
Shirley
science forum beginner


Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:49 am    Post subject: Re: A Quantum Philosophical Thesis Reply with quote

"dave hillstrom" <dAvE@MeOw.oRg> wrote in message
news:e7n1cp$im4$118@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
Quote:
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 17:33:52 -0400, "Shirley" <bigd1999@bellsoutj.net
wrote:


"dave hillstrom" <dAvE@MeOw.oRg> wrote in message
news:e7muo5$im4$116@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 17:15:56 -0400, "Shirley" <bigd1999@bellsoutj.net
wrote:


"line_voltage" <spammers.hell@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:bywng.3438$il.2502@trnddc03...
mimus wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 15:09:26 -0700, mikegordge wrote:


Smee wrote:


You are hereby fined 27 and one half points for obfuscation.

And you reckon saying *numbers dont exist in nature* isn't coming
from
an obfuscated and seriously fucked up reason dead brain?


Try reading the OP again. No one said anything about numbers not
existing
in nature . . . .



raises hand

numbers do NOT exist in nature

bows


If numbers do not exist in nature then why during a bad year do some of
natures wildlife decrease their number of offspring by a certain amount?

find me a number in nature, shirley. come back when youve found it.

You wish is my command master.... ;o}

http://www.mcs.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/R.Knott/Fibonacci/fibnat.html

i disagree. thats a human conceived numbering scheme that is used to
explain nature.

nature doesnt know what 5813 means. only humans do. and only those
taught mathematics, in particular.

deer and flowers and stars and moons dont know what 5813 means. or a
fibonacci series.

numbers are strictly in the minds of humans, as far as anyone can
prove.

They may not know the what 5813 is, but they do know numbers...

http://www.americanscientist.org/template/AssetDetail/assetid/21319?fulltext=true&print=yes

Quote:


--
Dave Hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj
"I can't find my puppy, can you help me find him? I think he went
into this cheap motel room."
-Dave Hillstrom
Back to top
line_voltage
science forum beginner


Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:13 am    Post subject: Re: A Quantum Philosophical Thesis Reply with quote

Veronica Karlsson wrote:

Quote:


Apparently most birds don't know how to count to more than one, and they
survive just fine.



<chirp>

and that goes for even the birds in new zealand i've heard from actual
kiwis, apart from this yellow-breasted warbling masturbator ...:_{D


<chirp>


<chirp>
<chirp>
<chirp>
<chirp>
<chirp>
<burp>
Back to top
line_voltage
science forum beginner


Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 4

PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:08 am    Post subject: Re: A Quantum Philosophical Thesis Reply with quote

Shirley wrote:
Quote:
"line_voltage" <spammers.hell@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:bywng.3438$il.2502@trnddc03...

mimus wrote:

On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 15:09:26 -0700, mikegordge wrote:



Smee wrote:



You are hereby fined 27 and one half points for obfuscation.

And you reckon saying *numbers dont exist in nature* isn't coming from
an obfuscated and seriously fucked up reason dead brain?


Try reading the OP again. No one said anything about numbers not
existing
in nature . . . .



raises hand

numbers do NOT exist in nature

bows


If numbers do not exist in nature then why during a bad year do some of
natures wildlife decrease their number of offspring by a certain amount?



because when you finally get right it's not quantity that matters, it's
quality

#:-{D
Back to top
mimus
science forum addict


Joined: 06 Sep 2005
Posts: 51

PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 1:49 am    Post subject: Re: A Quantum Philosophical Thesis Reply with quote

On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 20:46:19 -0500, Tim Weaver wrote:

Quote:
mimus wrote:

On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 15:24:05 -0700, mikegordge wrote:


mimus wrote:
In both cases, the symbol corresponds to something real (hopefully), in
the case of an ordinal number an order, a cardinal number a count, and a
real number an amount or magnitude.

And a real number, of infinite precision, implies an amount or magnitude
of equal precision . . . .

Absolute meaningless piffle in other words, of absolutely NO USE to man
at all. Goodness me.

If you consider ordering, counting and measurement of no use, then you
really _must_ be a conservative.

On the order of Pat Robertson. Or Islamic fundamentalists.

Wow. Perhaps you meant ~winger~ (left and right), instead of conservative.

I know what I meant, and I typed what I meant.

--
tinmimus99@hotmail.com

smeeter 11 or maybe 12

mp 10

mhm 29x13

I wonder what I have been up to.

< _Beyond Apollo_
Back to top
Tim Weaver
science forum beginner


Joined: 24 Jun 2006
Posts: 9

PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 1:46 am    Post subject: Re: A Quantum Philosophical Thesis Reply with quote

mimus wrote:

Quote:
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 15:24:05 -0700, mikegordge wrote:


mimus wrote:
In both cases, the symbol corresponds to something real (hopefully), in
the case of an ordinal number an order, a cardinal number a count, and a
real number an amount or magnitude.

And a real number, of infinite precision, implies an amount or magnitude
of equal precision . . . .

Absolute meaningless piffle in other words, of absolutely NO USE to man
at all. Goodness me.

If you consider ordering, counting and measurement of no use, then you
really _must_ be a conservative.

On the order of Pat Robertson. Or Islamic fundamentalists.

Wow. Perhaps you meant ~winger~ (left and right), instead of conservative.
--
Tim Weaver

I know you think you understand what you thought I said,
but I an not so sure what you heard is not what I meant.
Back to top
mimus
science forum addict


Joined: 06 Sep 2005
Posts: 51

PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 1:35 am    Post subject: Re: A Quantum Philosophical Thesis Reply with quote

On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 15:24:05 -0700, mikegordge wrote:

Quote:

mimus wrote:
In both cases, the symbol corresponds to something real (hopefully), in
the case of an ordinal number an order, a cardinal number a count, and a
real number an amount or magnitude.

And a real number, of infinite precision, implies an amount or
magnitude of equal precision . . . .

Absolute meaningless piffle in other words, of absolutely NO USE to man
at all. Goodness me.

If you consider ordering, counting and measurement of no use, then you
really _must_ be a conservative.

On the order of Pat Robertson. Or Islamic fundamentalists.

--
tinmimus99@hotmail.com

smeeter 11 or maybe 12

mp 10

mhm 29x13

I wonder what I have been up to.

< _Beyond Apollo_
Back to top
mimus
science forum addict


Joined: 06 Sep 2005
Posts: 51

PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 1:28 am    Post subject: Re: A Quantum Philosophical Thesis Reply with quote

On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 13:29:40 -0700, mikegordge wrote:

Quote:

dave hillstrom wrote:

Nothing, nothing absolutely nothing at all about the subject of the
invented thread of the silly nonsense of inventing numbers, which
incidentally NO-ONE has explained what the f*** that is all about and
why and how man needs to know anything about it, but dave hillstrom,
(who obviously has such a low opinion of himself that he doesn't regard
his own name worthy of being capitalised), the trait of a socialist
masochist if ever there was, who chose instead to attack me personally
because I had appropriately responded to another leftist fuckwit who
was also attacking me and who also did so without one single referrence
to the subject.

What is it with these fucking clowns who hate their ideas being
challenged so much that the believe the only possible response is
attacking the challenger and not the challenge?

<cough>

I believe that was Dave's question to you.

--
tinmimus99@hotmail.com

smeeter 11 or maybe 12

mp 10

mhm 29x13

I wonder what I have been up to.

< _Beyond Apollo_
Back to top
Tim Weaver
science forum beginner


Joined: 24 Jun 2006
Posts: 9

PostPosted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 10:25 pm    Post subject: Re: A Quantum Philosophical Thesis Reply with quote

Veronica Karlsson wrote:
Quote:
mikegordge@xtra.co.nz wrote:
line_voltage wrote:

numbers do NOT exist in nature

That's metaphysics, my questions relate to epistemology. It can be
argued that numbers do exist in nature, they exist as necessary
essential concepts of human survival, albeit inside man's mind,
existing as a real unimagined mental abstraction.

Numbers are concepts, concepts exist in man's mind for a purpose, a
number is a measurement of units, it is what man uses to help form
mental abstractions, mental pictures of problems of his survival that
need solving.

My question is, what purpose, what use to man, what problems can man
solve using the idea that numbers are not real, that numbers dont exist
in nature?

What is your point of even talking about real / unreal numbers when in
fact they ARE real and mans survival would become a matter of chance
without them?

Apparently most birds don't know how to count to more than one, and they
survive just fine.

Site your source.

Chickens can be taught tic tac toe. Parrots and such as mimic. They're not
completely stupid.

(you can ~NOT~ beat that chicken in China Town.)
--
Tim Weaver

I know you think you understand what you thought I said,
but I an not so sure what you heard is not what I meant.
Back to top
mikegordge@xtra.co.nz
science forum beginner


Joined: 12 Jun 2006
Posts: 23

PostPosted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 10:24 pm    Post subject: Re: A Quantum Philosophical Thesis Reply with quote

mimus wrote:
Quote:
In both cases, the symbol corresponds to something real (hopefully), in
the case of an ordinal number an order, a cardinal number a count, and a
real number an amount or magnitude.

And a real number, of infinite precision, implies an amount or
magnitude of equal precision . . . .

Absolute meaningless piffle in other words, of absolutely NO USE to man
at all. Goodness me.


MIchael Gordge
Back to top
Tim Weaver
science forum beginner


Joined: 24 Jun 2006
Posts: 9

PostPosted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 10:21 pm    Post subject: Re: A Quantum Philosophical Thesis Reply with quote

wrote:

Quote:

line_voltage wrote:

numbers do NOT exist in nature

That's metaphysics, my questions relate to epistemology. It can be
argued that numbers do exist in nature, they exist as necessary
essential concepts of human survival, albeit inside man's mind,
existing as a real unimagined mental abstraction.

Numbers are concepts, concepts exist in man's mind for a purpose, a
number is a measurement of units, it is what man uses to help form
mental abstractions, mental pictures of problems of his survival that
need solving.

My question is, what purpose, what use to man, what problems can man
solve using the idea that numbers are not real, that numbers dont exist
in nature?

What is your point of even talking about real / unreal numbers when in
fact they ARE real and mans survival would become a matter of chance
without them?

<full stop>

How is it that numbers (real or imagined) are ~necessary~ for survival. I
would agree the concepts of ~more~ and ~less~ (as in, more food or we'll
die) as being necessary.
--
Tim Weaver

I know you think you understand what you thought I said,
but I an not so sure what you heard is not what I meant.
Back to top
Veronica Karlsson
science forum beginner


Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 10:19 pm    Post subject: Re: A Quantum Philosophical Thesis Reply with quote

mikegordge@xtra.co.nz wrote:
Quote:
line_voltage wrote:

numbers do NOT exist in nature

That's metaphysics, my questions relate to epistemology. It can be
argued that numbers do exist in nature, they exist as necessary
essential concepts of human survival, albeit inside man's mind,
existing as a real unimagined mental abstraction.

Numbers are concepts, concepts exist in man's mind for a purpose, a
number is a measurement of units, it is what man uses to help form
mental abstractions, mental pictures of problems of his survival that
need solving.

My question is, what purpose, what use to man, what problems can man
solve using the idea that numbers are not real, that numbers dont exist
in nature?

What is your point of even talking about real / unreal numbers when in
fact they ARE real and mans survival would become a matter of chance
without them?

Apparently most birds don't know how to count to more than one, and they
survive just fine.


--
__ __ _____ _____ ______ __ _ _ _____ __
||| \ \ ) )/ / \|| | \ \ / / \ \ | \ | || | / / \| ) \
||.. \ \/ /| |_/| | |_/ /| | | || \ | || || | / \
|.PP. \ / | | \| | | \ \| | | || |\_\| || || | / /\ \
_\/___ \_( \_\__/||_| \_\\_\__/_/ |_| |_||_| \_\__/|(_( \_\
|_______ Troll Spokeswoman _____ http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/ ___|
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 6 [78 Posts] Goto page:  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Tue Jun 27, 2017 12:19 am | All times are GMT
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics » New Theories
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts Signal Nonlocality Loophole in Quantum Theory? Jack Sarfatti Math 0 Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:59 am
No new posts Jungian Archetypes in Post-Quantum Psychotronics Jack Sarfatti Math 0 Tue Jul 18, 2006 4:40 am
No new posts A Look at Quantum "Spookiness" Egap Strings 0 Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:52 am
No new posts thesis about singapore math Claudia Math 0 Fri Jul 14, 2006 5:54 pm
No new posts thesis about singapore math Claudia Math 2 Fri Jul 14, 2006 5:15 pm

Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Electronics forum |  Medicine forum |  Unix/Linux blog |  Unix/Linux documentation |  Unix/Linux forums  |  send newsletters
 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 8.9738s ][ Queries: 16 (8.7312s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]