This is What Einstein Actually Did.

Sorcerer · science forum Guru Joined: 09 Jun 2006 Posts: 410

"PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1151496744.924923.260870@j72g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
|
| Sorcerer wrote:
| > "PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message
| > news:1151443331.684517.255630@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
| > |
| > | Sorcerer wrote:
| > | > "tomgee" <tyropress@yahoo.com> wrote in message
| > | > news:1151431530.173601.106530@y41g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...
| > | >
| > | > PD believes anyone that doesn't follow his religion is showing
| > "*exactly*
| > | > what is wrong with their thinking. I call that bigotry, because no
| > matter
| > | > how
| > | > you argue with him, he'll always be right in his eyes. He is the
typical
| > | > shithead
| > | > and arsehole.
| > | > Androcles
| > |
| > | In your case, Androcles, it's pretty plain what's wrong with your
| > | thinking. It's a pretty short trip following your thinking before you
| > | run into something that's patently wrong.
| > |
| > | Like how muons that are superluminal will leave the same amount of
| > | energy in a scintillator regardless of their initial speed, and still
| > | come out to be just under c by the time they leave the scintillator.
| > | You say, "I don't know HOW it does that, but it's sure more believable
| > | than time dilation." Apparently, to spit out something you thing is
| > | hogwash, you'd be happy to swallow something from further down the
| > | colon.
| > |
| >
| > I was talking about you, not to you.
| > You say a muon slows down in a scintillator
|
| I did? Where did I say that?
| Liar.
"Like how muons that are superluminal will leave the same amount of
energy in a scintillator regardless of their initial speed, and still
come out to be just under c by the time they leave the scintillator." -
CUNT.

|
| >and you don't know how
| > it does that,
|
| I don't? Where did I say that?
| Liar.

Oh, you do know how they lose energy without slowing down.... do tell us
all, cunt.

|
| >so it must have gone in at just under c = 0/0 and come
| > out at c = 1/0. <shrug>
|
| c = 299,792,458 m/s (or 1, depending on your system of units).
| Are you a bonehead, Androcles? Why yes, yes, I believe you are.

See what I mean? No matter how you argue with him, he'll always be right in
his eyes.
He is the typical shithead and arsehole.
The speed of light from A to B is AB/(tB-tA) = 299,792,458 m/s
whereas c from A to A is 0/(t'A-tA) = 0/0 m/s.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/DominoEffect.GIF
Everybody knows a constant velocity reverses direction, don't you, Phuckwit
Cunt?
Us boneheads will continue with speed of light from A to B is AB/(tB-tA) =
299,792,458 m/s
leaving you phuckwits in the dust.

Androcles.

Sorcerer · science forum Guru Joined: 09 Jun 2006 Posts: 410

"PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1151497271.064482.304000@j72g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
|
| Sorcerer wrote:
| > "Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
| > news:l8e3a2dg48lfg1l2f786t4puv9a0s069p3@4ax.com...
| > | On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:29:18 GMT, "Sorcerer"
| > <Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_a>
| > | wrote:
| > | >
| > | >Phuckwit Duck:
| > | > " I have to admit that I am demoralized at the moment.
| > | >
| > | > I had hoped that we could fight ignorance with a proactive rather
| > | > than a reactive approach, but this is clearly the improper forum for
| > | > that. A quick survey of the length of threads initiated by or
drifting
| > | > to nonsense compared to the length of threads based on sound
thinking
| > | > reveals the true interest in the proposal.
| > | >
| > | > While it would be a useful project to contribute to the FAQ, the
| > | > intent was to educate in the context of discussion, a virtual
| > | > "classroom" if you will. There's no point in contributing to a
| > | > reference that none of the "students" will read or attempt to learn
| > | > from. The intention was to focus on *exactly* what is wrong in
| > | > someone's thinking (which varies from person to person), set it
| > | > straight, and then make progress from there.
| > | >
| > | > I had high hopes -- really -- that perhaps one misguided soul would
| > | > read something sensible and say, "Oh... Really?...Oh. I see I was
| > | > confused. OK, I get it now. Now what about...?" My head knew better,
| > | > my heart does not.
| > | >
| > | > [sitting in the duck blind, waiting with a shotgun for a duck to
| > | > appear]"
| > | >-- Phuckwit Duck.
| > | >
| > | >PD believes anyone that doesn't follow his religion is showing
"*exactly*
| > | >what is wrong with their thinking. I call that bigotry, because no
matter
| > | >how
| > | >you argue with him, he'll always be right in his eyes. He is the
typical
| > | >shithead
| > | >and arsehole.
| > |
| > | ...and leader of the SRian baboon brigade, a pathetic collection of
| > | self-opiniated would-be's who just don't have any scientifric ability.
| > |
| >
| > He is certainly the most vociferous at the moment. I guarantee he'll
| > snip when cornered by logic he cannot respond to in any other way.
|
| Why, Androcles, I'm shocked! I haven't snipped a thing you said here.

I was talking about you, not to you.
You'll snip when cornered by mathematics.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Smart/Smart.htm

| >
| > A non-partisan lurker would instantly see that, so I have no idea what
| > he hopes to gain by snipping, that is the least persuasive argument of
all.
| > Few of the shitheads will respond to me anymore, they know when
| > they are up against a heavyweight.
|
| Ah yes, a fierce opponent who no one wants to take on anymore:
| http://www2.gol.com/users/coynerhm/roadkill.jpg

Is that a physics argument or a demoralised argument, phuckwit cunt?

When a Brit wants to flatten the opposition, he does it right:

http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2006/06/jcbhousecrush270606_600x357.jpg
"He not only took out the couple's entire house and contents, he wrote off
two brand-new luxury cars and a police car as well. He even began to swing
the vehicle's lethal front bucket at the £250,000 two-storey house and tore
a hole in the wall before Miss Gledhill had time to make a hasty exit from
the upstairs bedroom. A police car which tried to block his path was
squashed by the bucket as if it were a fly being swatted. " - Daily Mail
:-)

Androcles

|
| > Let them collaborate and form a
| > joint opinion, I'll take them ALL on, from Baez to Roberts to all the
way
| > down to the lightweights Spookfood and Gisse.
| > Androcles.
|

Sorcerer · science forum Guru Joined: 09 Jun 2006 Posts: 410

"PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1151496945.067946.10750@y41g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...
|
| Sorcerer wrote:
| > "PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message
| > news:1151450763.888278.83270@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
| > |
| > | Henri Wilson wrote:
| > | > On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:29:18 GMT, "Sorcerer"
| > <Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_a>
| > | > wrote:
| > | >
| > | > >
| > | > >PD believes anyone that doesn't follow his religion is showing
| > "*exactly*
| > | > >what is wrong with their thinking. I call that bigotry, because no
| > matter
| > | > >how
| > | > >you argue with him, he'll always be right in his eyes. He is the
| > typical
| > | > >shithead
| > | > >and arsehole.
| > | >
| > | > ...and leader of the SRian baboon brigade, a pathetic collection of
| > | > self-opiniated would-be's who just don't have any scientifric
ability.
| > | >
| > |
| > | And who appointed me leader? You? No one else has.
| >
| > Observation, shithead. You write the most. Therefore you are the leading
| > baboon.
|
| Hell, that's not even true. I write a lot, but certainly not the most.
|
| >
| >
| > | And how do you judge scientific ability, Henri?
| >
| > By applicability to technology and reality.
| >
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Synchronize/Synchronize.htm
|
| Hello, Henri. Have you changed pseudonyms again?

Yawn...

| >
| >
| > | By whether they are
| > | original or by whether they are right?
| >
| > You can't be right, Sagnac proves it.
| >
| > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Sagnac/Sagnac.htm
| >
| > This is where you start muttering "inertial" and "domain of
applicability".
| >
| > You are shitheads.

No answer to that, is there, shithead?

| > Androcles
|

AllYou! · science forum Guru Joined: 08 May 2005 Posts: 1088

"tomgee" <tyropress@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1151510786.148785.108490@x69g2000cwx.googlegroups.com...

Phineas T Puddleduck · science forum Guru Joined: 01 Jun 2006 Posts: 759

In article <1151508097.151742.198910@x69g2000cwx.googlegroups.com>,
<dwhig265@aol.com> wrote:

Dirk Van de moortel · science forum Guru Joined: 01 May 2005 Posts: 3019

"Sorcerer" <Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_a> wrote in message news:CYxog.490336$tc.195439@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...

PD · science forum Guru Joined: 03 May 2005 Posts: 4363

Sorcerer wrote:

PD · science forum Guru Joined: 03 May 2005 Posts: 4363

Sorcerer wrote:

PD · science forum Guru Joined: 03 May 2005 Posts: 4363

Sorcerer wrote:
[snip]
No mathematics there.

PD

Sorcerer · science forum Guru Joined: 09 Jun 2006 Posts: 410

"PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1151518607.218930.320160@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
|
| Sorcerer wrote:
| > "PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message
| > news:1151496744.924923.260870@j72g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
| > |
| > | Sorcerer wrote:
| > | > "PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message
| > | > news:1151443331.684517.255630@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
| > | > |
| > | > | Sorcerer wrote:
| > | > | > "tomgee" <tyropress@yahoo.com> wrote in message
| > | > | > news:1151431530.173601.106530@y41g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...
| > | > | >
| > | > | > PD believes anyone that doesn't follow his religion is showing
| > | > "*exactly*
| > | > | > what is wrong with their thinking. I call that bigotry, because
no
| > | > matter
| > | > | > how
| > | > | > you argue with him, he'll always be right in his eyes. He is the
| > typical
| > | > | > shithead
| > | > | > and arsehole.
| > | > | > Androcles
| > | > |
| > | > | In your case, Androcles, it's pretty plain what's wrong with your
| > | > | thinking. It's a pretty short trip following your thinking before
you
| > | > | run into something that's patently wrong.
| > | > |
| > | > | Like how muons that are superluminal will leave the same amount of
| > | > | energy in a scintillator regardless of their initial speed, and
still
| > | > | come out to be just under c by the time they leave the
scintillator.
| > | > | You say, "I don't know HOW it does that, but it's sure more
believable
| > | > | than time dilation." Apparently, to spit out something you thing
is
| > | > | hogwash, you'd be happy to swallow something from further down the
| > | > | colon.
| > | > |
| > | >
| > | > I was talking about you, not to you.
| > | > You say a muon slows down in a scintillator
| > |
| > | I did? Where did I say that?
| > | Liar.
| > "Like how muons that are superluminal will leave the same amount of
| > energy in a scintillator regardless of their initial speed, and still
| > come out to be just under c by the time they leave the scintillator." -
| > CUNT.
|
| I was referring to YOUR thinking, not mine, Androcles.

I know, arsehole, and I'm referring to yours. You say a muon slows down
(i.e. loses energy) in a scintillator, slowing to subluminal < c.

| Pay attention.
| Wipe the foam off your mouth, too, it's gotten on your glasses and
| impaired your reading.

Wipe your mouth out with soap, jackass. Your glasses need cleaning
and that impairs your writing.

| >
| >
| >
| >
| > |
| > | >and you don't know how
| > | > it does that,
| > |
| > | I don't? Where did I say that?
| > | Liar.
| >
| > Oh, you do know how they lose energy without slowing down.... do tell us
| > all, cunt.
|
| I know how they lose energy when they slow down.

See, you say muons slow down, and when I say you say it, you say I'm a
liar, you cunt. It's a pretty short trip following your thinking
before anyone runs into something that's patently wrong.
(Not that you've ever measured the speed of a muon before it's going
into a scintillator.) Anyway, the aurora are Cherenkov radiation, so clearly
particles entering atmosphere are superluminal.

| I didn't say that I
| don't know how it does that. You did. Would you like a reference to
| where you said that?

I know what you said, shithead. of course I said you don't know.
You didn't know how the aurorae glow, either, until I told you.

|
| >
| >
| > |
| > | >so it must have gone in at just under c = 0/0 and come
| > | > out at c = 1/0. <shrug>
| > |
| > | c = 299,792,458 m/s (or 1, depending on your system of units).
| > | Are you a bonehead, Androcles? Why yes, yes, I believe you are.
| >
| > See what I mean? No matter how you argue with him, he'll always be
right in
| > his eyes.
| > He is the typical shithead and arsehole.
| > The speed of light from A to B is AB/(tB-tA) = 299,792,458 m/s
|
| Yes indeed.
Yes indeed.
|
| > whereas c from A to A is 0/(t'A-tA) = 0/0 m/s.
|
| No, that's not a speed during a round-trip, that's the magnitude of the
| velocity on a round-trip. Do you not know the difference?

There is no velocity for a round trip, arsehole. Velocity is a vector,
it has both direction and magnitude, not two directions.

|
| You're a math major. You know the difference between an average of
| magnitudes and a magnitude of an average?
|
| > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/DominoEffect.GIF
| > Everybody knows a constant velocity reverses direction, don't you,
Phuckwit
| > Cunt?
| > Us boneheads will continue with speed of light from A to B is AB/(tB-tA)
=
| > 299,792,458 m/s
|
| That's fine.

Of course it is. Everybody knows a constant velocity reverses direction,
don't you, Phuckwit Cunt?
The speed of light = 299,792,458 m/s, the symbol c = 0/0 because
"the velocity of light in our theory plays the part, physically, of an
infinitely great velocity."- IFC Einstein

Phuckwit Duck plays the part, physically, of a Phuckwit Cunt.

Androcles.

|
| > leaving you phuckwits in the dust.
| >
| > Androcles.
|

Sorcerer · science forum Guru Joined: 09 Jun 2006 Posts: 410

"PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1151519016.104526.29100@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
|
| Sorcerer wrote:
| [snip]
| No mathematics there.
|
| PD

Correct, I upstaged your non-mathematical argument.
I was talking to Henri about you, not to you, cunt.
I can outflame you anytime, you even lose a flame war.
Have a nice flame:
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/flame.gif

unsnip
| Sorcerer wrote:
| > "Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
| > news:l8e3a2dg48lfg1l2f786t4puv9a0s069p3@4ax.com...
| > | On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:29:18 GMT, "Sorcerer"
| > <Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_a>
| > | wrote:
| > | >
| > | >Phuckwit Duck:
| > | > " I have to admit that I am demoralized at the moment.
| > | >
| > | > I had hoped that we could fight ignorance with a proactive rather
| > | > than a reactive approach, but this is clearly the improper forum for
| > | > that. A quick survey of the length of threads initiated by or
drifting
| > | > to nonsense compared to the length of threads based on sound
thinking
| > | > reveals the true interest in the proposal.
| > | >
| > | > While it would be a useful project to contribute to the FAQ, the
| > | > intent was to educate in the context of discussion, a virtual
| > | > "classroom" if you will. There's no point in contributing to a
| > | > reference that none of the "students" will read or attempt to learn
| > | > from. The intention was to focus on *exactly* what is wrong in
| > | > someone's thinking (which varies from person to person), set it
| > | > straight, and then make progress from there.
| > | >
| > | > I had high hopes -- really -- that perhaps one misguided soul would
| > | > read something sensible and say, "Oh... Really?...Oh. I see I was
| > | > confused. OK, I get it now. Now what about...?" My head knew better,
| > | > my heart does not.
| > | >
| > | > [sitting in the duck blind, waiting with a shotgun for a duck to
| > | > appear]"
| > | >-- Phuckwit Duck.
| > | >
| > | >PD believes anyone that doesn't follow his religion is showing
"*exactly*
| > | >what is wrong with their thinking. I call that bigotry, because no
matter
| > | >how
| > | >you argue with him, he'll always be right in his eyes. He is the
typical
| > | >shithead
| > | >and arsehole.
| > |
| > | ...and leader of the SRian baboon brigade, a pathetic collection of
| > | self-opiniated would-be's who just don't have any scientifric ability.
| > |
| >
| > He is certainly the most vociferous at the moment. I guarantee he'll
| > snip when cornered by logic he cannot respond to in any other way.
|
| Why, Androcles, I'm shocked! I haven't snipped a thing you said here.

I was talking about you, not to you.
You'll snip when cornered by mathematics.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Smart/Smart.htm

| >
| > A non-partisan lurker would instantly see that, so I have no idea what
| > he hopes to gain by snipping, that is the least persuasive argument of
all.
| > Few of the shitheads will respond to me anymore, they know when
| > they are up against a heavyweight.
|
| Ah yes, a fierce opponent who no one wants to take on anymore:
| http://www2.gol.com/users/coynerhm/roadkill.jpg

Is that a physics argument or a demoralised argument, phuckwit cunt?

When a Brit wants to flatten the opposition, he does it right:

http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2006/06/jcbhousecrush270606_600x357.jpg
"He not only took out the couple's entire house and contents, he wrote off
two brand-new luxury cars and a police car as well. He even began to swing
the vehicle's lethal front bucket at the £250,000 two-storey house and tore
a hole in the wall before Miss Gledhill had time to make a hasty exit from
the upstairs bedroom. A police car which tried to block his path was
squashed by the bucket as if it were a fly being swatted. " - Daily Mail
:-)

Androcles

|
| > Let them collaborate and form a
| > joint opinion, I'll take them ALL on, from Baez to Roberts to all the
way
| > down to the lightweights Spookfood and Gisse.
| > Androcles.
|

Sorcerer · science forum Guru Joined: 09 Jun 2006 Posts: 410

"PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1151518842.792069.303860@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
|
| Sorcerer wrote:
| > "PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message
| > news:1151496945.067946.10750@y41g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...
| > |
| > | Sorcerer wrote:
| > | > "PD" <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote in message
| > | > news:1151450763.888278.83270@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
| > | > |
| > | > | Henri Wilson wrote:
| > | > | > On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:29:18 GMT, "Sorcerer"
| > | > <Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_a>
| > | > | > wrote:
| > | > | >
| > | > | > >
| > | > | > >PD believes anyone that doesn't follow his religion is showing
| > | > "*exactly*
| > | > | > >what is wrong with their thinking. I call that bigotry, because
no
| > | > matter
| > | > | > >how
| > | > | > >you argue with him, he'll always be right in his eyes. He is
the
| > | > typical
| > | > | > >shithead
| > | > | > >and arsehole.
| > | > | >
| > | > | > ...and leader of the SRian baboon brigade, a pathetic collection
of
| > | > | > self-opiniated would-be's who just don't have any scientifric
| > ability.
| > | > | >
| > | > |
| > | > | And who appointed me leader? You? No one else has.
| > | >
| > | > Observation, shithead. You write the most. Therefore you are the
leading
| > | > baboon.
| > |
| > | Hell, that's not even true. I write a lot, but certainly not the most.
| > |
| > | >
| > | >
| > | > | And how do you judge scientific ability, Henri?
| > | >
| > | > By applicability to technology and reality.
| > | >
| > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Synchronize/Synchronize.htm
| > |
| > | Hello, Henri. Have you changed pseudonyms again?
| >
| > Yawn...
| >
| >
| > | >
| > | >
| > | > | By whether they are
| > | > | original or by whether they are right?
| > | >
| > | > You can't be right, Sagnac proves it.
| > | >
| > | > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Sagnac/Sagnac.htm
| > | >
| > | > This is where you start muttering "inertial" and "domain of
| > applicability".
| > | >
| > | > You are shitheads.
| >
| > No answer to that, is there, shithead?
|
| Answer to what? The place where I didn't mutter anything about ... what
| were those two things you said I'd mutter?

You have no answer to Sagnac, shithead.

|
| Or do you mean that vast waste of energy you call a web page? Have you
| stopped neglecting your grandchildren yet, Androcles?

I'd snip since you produced no mathematics, but I like driving
the point home. That vast waste of energy has convinced a few youngsters
that Einstein was a shithead almost before they've heard of him.
Quite smart, some kids, especially my buddy's grandson aged 13.
They get free copies of my book, too, as well as a new piano.
Do you buy your grandkids 76-key Casio pianos, Phuckwit Duck?
http://www.apsbuyonline.co.uk/catalog/product.php?productid=16351

Androcles.

Henri Wilson · science forum Guru Joined: 08 May 2005 Posts: 3381

On 28 Jun 2006 09:06:26 -0700, "tomgee" <tyropress@yahoo.com> wrote:

Henri Wilson · science forum Guru Joined: 08 May 2005 Posts: 3381

On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:07:37 GMT, "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_a>
wrote:

dda1 · science forum Guru Joined: 06 Feb 2006 Posts: 762

Patented Cretin Henri Wilson wrote:
<he,he,he , snipped, he can only spew idiocies>

You are eating too much s**t, Henri. You may chocke on it. Actually,
you will choke on it.

Google