|
|
| Author |
Message |
Hauke Reddmann science forum Guru Wannabe
Joined: 03 May 2005
Posts: 112
|
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 8:16 am Post subject:
Tensor Inverse?
|
|
|
Is there something that could be termed "inverse" to
a tensor like, say, T^i_jk? If the "determinant" is
nonzero? And even more, if yes, does T*U=T*V imply
U=V?
--
Hauke Reddmann <:-EX8 fc3a501@uni-hamburg.de
His-Ala-Sec-Lys-Glu Arg-Glu-Asp-Asp-Met-Ala-Asn-Asn |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Robert Low science forum Guru
Joined: 01 May 2005
Posts: 1063
|
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 8:41 am Post subject:
Re: Tensor Inverse?
|
|
|
Hauke Reddmann wrote:
| Quote: | Is there something that could be termed "inverse" to
a tensor like, say, T^i_jk? If the "determinant" is
nonzero? And even more, if yes, does T*U=T*V imply
U=V?
|
You can think of a tensor as a linear operator
(generally in many different ways). No reason
why some of them shouldn't have inverses.
For example, you might have some vector space
V, and T is in V \otimes V \otimes V* \otimes V*
(where \otimes means tensor product). Then you
can think of T as a linear map from V* \otimes V*
to V* \otimes V*, or as a linear map from
V \otimes V* to V \otimes V*, or from V to
V \otimes V \otimes V*, or ....
Then you can pick bases for the domain and codomain
of the tensor thought of as a linear mapping with that
domain and codomain, express your tensor with respect
to those bases, and do what you'd normally do with
the resulting matrix. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Timothy Murphy science forum Guru Wannabe
Joined: 29 Apr 2005
Posts: 275
|
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 2:29 pm Post subject:
Re: Tensor Inverse?
|
|
|
Hauke Reddmann wrote:
| Quote: | Is there something that could be termed "inverse" to
a tensor like, say, T^i_jk? If the "determinant" is
nonzero? And even more, if yes, does T*U=T*V imply
U=V?
|
It isn't clear what you mean by T*U .
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hauke Reddmann science forum Guru Wannabe
Joined: 03 May 2005
Posts: 112
|
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 9:32 am Post subject:
Re: Tensor Inverse?
|
|
|
Timothy Murphy <tim@birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
| Quote: | Hauke Reddmann wrote:
Is there something that could be termed "inverse" to
a tensor like, say, T^i_jk? If the "determinant" is
nonzero? And even more, if yes, does T*U=T*V imply
U=V?
It isn't clear what you mean by T*U .
|
U and V are tensors, T*U is standard multiplication in
index form (and that may even contain some implicit
Einstein summation - could be relevant)
--
Hauke Reddmann <:-EX8 fc3a501@uni-hamburg.de
His-Ala-Sec-Lys-Glu Arg-Glu-Asp-Asp-Met-Ala-Asn-Asn |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Timothy Murphy science forum Guru Wannabe
Joined: 29 Apr 2005
Posts: 275
|
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 11:37 am Post subject:
Re: Tensor Inverse?
|
|
|
Hauke Reddmann wrote:
| Quote: | Timothy Murphy <tim@birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
Hauke Reddmann wrote:
Is there something that could be termed "inverse" to
a tensor like, say, T^i_jk? If the "determinant" is
nonzero? And even more, if yes, does T*U=T*V imply
U=V?
It isn't clear what you mean by T*U .
U and V are tensors, T*U is standard multiplication in
index form (and that may even contain some implicit
Einstein summation - could be relevant)
|
That still doesn't clarify it, at least for me.
What exactly are U,V?
Incidentally, the tensor T^i_jk has a unique
Penrose/Moore generalized inverse X_i^jk ,
at least of you are working over the complex numbers.
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
The time now is Sat Jan 10, 2009 4:08 am | All times are GMT
|
|
Mortgage Calculator | Debt Consolidation | Online Advertising | Nikes | Quick Collect
|
|
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
|
|
Other DeniX Solutions sites:
Electronics forum |
Medicine forum |
Unix/Linux blog |
Unix/Linux documentation |
Unix/Linux forums
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|