FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics
A theory of magick, and the importance of catholic belief.
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 6 of 8 [111 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Goto page:  Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Next
Author Message
Erwin Hessle
science forum beginner


Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 23

PostPosted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 9:46 pm    Post subject: Re: A theory of magick, and the importance of catholic belief. Reply with quote

Archangel wrote:
Quote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
2 wrote:
"Erwin Hessle" <erwin@erwinhessle.com> wrote:

No it doesn't. There could be three distinct universes infinitely
repeated, for all you know.
That was not the posit, you moron. The posit was an infinity of universes.
Three distinct universes repeated an infinite number of times *is* an
infinity of universes, cockfag.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

But not an infinite number of possible universes as the OP stated. Do
you not really understand the distinction?
Do you really not understand the wisdom of actually reading the post
you are pretending to quote before doing so to me?

That old inability to quote defect of yours is rearing it's head again.

No surprises there, then.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

Shrug, a quick survey of the previous posts to try and render some help
to you when you seemed to be having trouble handling the intellectual
side of the argument. I admit to carelessness in this regard. But not
intellectual laziness, or an inability to understand the issues. Oddly
enough I dont peruse every word of your arguments, looking for the
wisdom therein. Not enough return on the investment.
That's a lot of words to admit you're a twat.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

I am sure you think that is rational. What was the logic behind that
conclusion? I only ask because it probably isnt the conclusion that most
people would draw from the words... how did you draw that conclusion?
No, you are mistaken. I'd bet a pound almost everyone here would agree
with my conclusion.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3


really? is that what you really think?

Is that what *you* really think?

Erwin Hessle, 8=3



do you *really* think?

Do you *really* believe that you *really* think?

Erwin Hessle, 8=3
Back to top
Erwin Hessle
science forum beginner


Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 23

PostPosted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 9:47 pm    Post subject: Re: A theory of magick, and the importance of catholic belief. Reply with quote

Archangel wrote:
Quote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Tom wrote:
"Martin Swain" <martin_swain@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:M0irg.43622$B91.23488@edtnps82...
"2" <nhoj@droffats.ten> wrote in message
news:12ar11ohlehra9@news.supernews.com...
Infinity means just exactly that - unbounded, endless possible universes.
Surely one of them has physics our impoverished imagination cannot
conceive of, and that includes the universe which does not have persons
who are stuck in decision-split concepts, or persons at all!

Yes that's right. Using the idea here defined a decision point, over
an infinite span of decisions all possibilities would occur. Why? Because
that's what infinite means. Someone could say "yes, but what if it just
repeats
infinitely?" except, by allowing that, you've put a limit on it, saying it
repeats infinitely
and called it done, but infinite means there is always a next one. The set
of integers,
for instance, is infinite.
But there are an infinite number of real numbers that are not integers and
therefore are not going to be included in the infinity of integers. Only
integers belong to that set. The set of all integers is an infinite, but
bounded, set. There are no non-integers that are possioble within the
infinity of integers. Thus, there may be rules that must be obeyed by all
possibilities in the multiverse, even when the number of possibilities
within that multiverse are infinite.


irrelevant.

A
The first insightful description of yourself I've ever heard from you.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

did you think I was referring to myself? Why did you think that?
Because you are irrelevant.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3


Really?

Do you always try so hard to defeat people in argument who are irrelevant?

The fact that you think this is "try[ing] so hard" says volumes for
both your level of inability and for your irrelevance.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3


the fact that you try so hard speaks volumes for your need to be taken
seriously.

The fact of how you define "hard" speaks volumes for your laughable
inexperience.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3
Back to top
Archangelska
science forum beginner


Joined: 28 Apr 2006
Posts: 36

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 10:15 am    Post subject: Re: A theory of magick, and the importance of catholic belief. Reply with quote

Erwin Hessle wrote:
Quote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
2 wrote:
"Erwin Hessle" <erwin@erwinhessle.com> wrote:

No it doesn't. There could be three distinct universes infinitely
repeated, for all you know.
That was not the posit, you moron. The posit was an infinity of universes.
Three distinct universes repeated an infinite number of times *is* an
infinity of universes, cockfag.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

But not an infinite number of possible universes as the OP stated. Do
you not really understand the distinction?
Do you really not understand the wisdom of actually reading the post
you are pretending to quote before doing so to me?

That old inability to quote defect of yours is rearing it's head again.

No surprises there, then.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

Shrug, a quick survey of the previous posts to try and render some help
to you when you seemed to be having trouble handling the intellectual
side of the argument. I admit to carelessness in this regard. But not
intellectual laziness, or an inability to understand the issues. Oddly
enough I dont peruse every word of your arguments, looking for the
wisdom therein. Not enough return on the investment.
That's a lot of words to admit you're a twat.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

I am sure you think that is rational. What was the logic behind that
conclusion? I only ask because it probably isnt the conclusion that most
people would draw from the words... how did you draw that conclusion?
No, you are mistaken. I'd bet a pound almost everyone here would agree
with my conclusion.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

really? is that what you really think?
Is that what *you* really think?

Erwin Hessle, 8=3


do you *really* think?

Do you *really* believe that you *really* think?

Erwin Hessle, 8=3



I really believe you dont think very much or very hard Erwin. What do
*you* think?

A
Back to top
Archangelska
science forum beginner


Joined: 28 Apr 2006
Posts: 36

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 10:16 am    Post subject: Re: A theory of magick, and the importance of catholic belief. Reply with quote

Erwin Hessle wrote:
Quote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Tom wrote:
"Martin Swain" <martin_swain@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:M0irg.43622$B91.23488@edtnps82...
"2" <nhoj@droffats.ten> wrote in message
news:12ar11ohlehra9@news.supernews.com...
Infinity means just exactly that - unbounded, endless possible universes.
Surely one of them has physics our impoverished imagination cannot
conceive of, and that includes the universe which does not have persons
who are stuck in decision-split concepts, or persons at all!

Yes that's right. Using the idea here defined a decision point, over
an infinite span of decisions all possibilities would occur. Why? Because
that's what infinite means. Someone could say "yes, but what if it just
repeats
infinitely?" except, by allowing that, you've put a limit on it, saying it
repeats infinitely
and called it done, but infinite means there is always a next one. The set
of integers,
for instance, is infinite.
But there are an infinite number of real numbers that are not integers and
therefore are not going to be included in the infinity of integers. Only
integers belong to that set. The set of all integers is an infinite, but
bounded, set. There are no non-integers that are possioble within the
infinity of integers. Thus, there may be rules that must be obeyed by all
possibilities in the multiverse, even when the number of possibilities
within that multiverse are infinite.


irrelevant.

A
The first insightful description of yourself I've ever heard from you.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

did you think I was referring to myself? Why did you think that?
Because you are irrelevant.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

Really?

Do you always try so hard to defeat people in argument who are irrelevant?
The fact that you think this is "try[ing] so hard" says volumes for
both your level of inability and for your irrelevance.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

the fact that you try so hard speaks volumes for your need to be taken
seriously.

The fact of how you define "hard" speaks volumes for your laughable
inexperience.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3



Which aspect of my experience is laughable Erwin?

A
Back to top
Erwin Hessle
science forum beginner


Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 23

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 1:28 pm    Post subject: Re: A theory of magick, and the importance of catholic belief. Reply with quote

Archangel wrote:
Quote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
2 wrote:
"Erwin Hessle" <erwin@erwinhessle.com> wrote:

No it doesn't. There could be three distinct universes infinitely
repeated, for all you know.
That was not the posit, you moron. The posit was an infinity of universes.
Three distinct universes repeated an infinite number of times *is* an
infinity of universes, cockfag.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

But not an infinite number of possible universes as the OP stated. Do
you not really understand the distinction?
Do you really not understand the wisdom of actually reading the post
you are pretending to quote before doing so to me?

That old inability to quote defect of yours is rearing it's head again.

No surprises there, then.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

Shrug, a quick survey of the previous posts to try and render some help
to you when you seemed to be having trouble handling the intellectual
side of the argument. I admit to carelessness in this regard. But not
intellectual laziness, or an inability to understand the issues. Oddly
enough I dont peruse every word of your arguments, looking for the
wisdom therein. Not enough return on the investment.
That's a lot of words to admit you're a twat.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

I am sure you think that is rational. What was the logic behind that
conclusion? I only ask because it probably isnt the conclusion that most
people would draw from the words... how did you draw that conclusion?
No, you are mistaken. I'd bet a pound almost everyone here would agree
with my conclusion.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

really? is that what you really think?
Is that what *you* really think?

Erwin Hessle, 8=3


do you *really* think?

Do you *really* believe that you *really* think?

Erwin Hessle, 8=3



I really believe you dont think very much or very hard Erwin. What do
*you* think?

What do *you* believe that I think?

Erwin Hessle, 8=3
Back to top
Erwin Hessle
science forum beginner


Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 23

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 1:29 pm    Post subject: Re: A theory of magick, and the importance of catholic belief. Reply with quote

Archangel wrote:
Quote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Tom wrote:
"Martin Swain" <martin_swain@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:M0irg.43622$B91.23488@edtnps82...
"2" <nhoj@droffats.ten> wrote in message
news:12ar11ohlehra9@news.supernews.com...
Infinity means just exactly that - unbounded, endless possible universes.
Surely one of them has physics our impoverished imagination cannot
conceive of, and that includes the universe which does not have persons
who are stuck in decision-split concepts, or persons at all!

Yes that's right. Using the idea here defined a decision point, over
an infinite span of decisions all possibilities would occur. Why? Because
that's what infinite means. Someone could say "yes, but what if it just
repeats
infinitely?" except, by allowing that, you've put a limit on it, saying it
repeats infinitely
and called it done, but infinite means there is always a next one. The set
of integers,
for instance, is infinite.
But there are an infinite number of real numbers that are not integers and
therefore are not going to be included in the infinity of integers. Only
integers belong to that set. The set of all integers is an infinite, but
bounded, set. There are no non-integers that are possioble within the
infinity of integers. Thus, there may be rules that must be obeyed by all
possibilities in the multiverse, even when the number of possibilities
within that multiverse are infinite.


irrelevant.

A
The first insightful description of yourself I've ever heard from you.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

did you think I was referring to myself? Why did you think that?
Because you are irrelevant.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

Really?

Do you always try so hard to defeat people in argument who are irrelevant?
The fact that you think this is "try[ing] so hard" says volumes for
both your level of inability and for your irrelevance.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

the fact that you try so hard speaks volumes for your need to be taken
seriously.

The fact of how you define "hard" speaks volumes for your laughable
inexperience.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3



Which aspect of my experience is laughable Erwin?

Your lack of it.

Combined with your poor reading skills.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3
Back to top
Archangelska
science forum beginner


Joined: 28 Apr 2006
Posts: 36

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 2:01 pm    Post subject: Re: A theory of magick, and the importance of catholic belief. Reply with quote

Erwin Hessle wrote:
Quote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
2 wrote:
"Erwin Hessle" <erwin@erwinhessle.com> wrote:

No it doesn't. There could be three distinct universes infinitely
repeated, for all you know.
That was not the posit, you moron. The posit was an infinity of universes.
Three distinct universes repeated an infinite number of times *is* an
infinity of universes, cockfag.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

But not an infinite number of possible universes as the OP stated. Do
you not really understand the distinction?
Do you really not understand the wisdom of actually reading the post
you are pretending to quote before doing so to me?

That old inability to quote defect of yours is rearing it's head again.

No surprises there, then.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

Shrug, a quick survey of the previous posts to try and render some help
to you when you seemed to be having trouble handling the intellectual
side of the argument. I admit to carelessness in this regard. But not
intellectual laziness, or an inability to understand the issues. Oddly
enough I dont peruse every word of your arguments, looking for the
wisdom therein. Not enough return on the investment.
That's a lot of words to admit you're a twat.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

I am sure you think that is rational. What was the logic behind that
conclusion? I only ask because it probably isnt the conclusion that most
people would draw from the words... how did you draw that conclusion?
No, you are mistaken. I'd bet a pound almost everyone here would agree
with my conclusion.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

really? is that what you really think?
Is that what *you* really think?

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

do you *really* think?
Do you *really* believe that you *really* think?

Erwin Hessle, 8=3


I really believe you dont think very much or very hard Erwin. What do
*you* think?

What do *you* believe that I think?

Erwin Hessle, 8=3


Not very much.

A
Back to top
Archangelska
science forum beginner


Joined: 28 Apr 2006
Posts: 36

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 2:02 pm    Post subject: Re: A theory of magick, and the importance of catholic belief. Reply with quote

Erwin Hessle wrote:
Quote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Tom wrote:
"Martin Swain" <martin_swain@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:M0irg.43622$B91.23488@edtnps82...
"2" <nhoj@droffats.ten> wrote in message
news:12ar11ohlehra9@news.supernews.com...
Infinity means just exactly that - unbounded, endless possible universes.
Surely one of them has physics our impoverished imagination cannot
conceive of, and that includes the universe which does not have persons
who are stuck in decision-split concepts, or persons at all!

Yes that's right. Using the idea here defined a decision point, over
an infinite span of decisions all possibilities would occur. Why? Because
that's what infinite means. Someone could say "yes, but what if it just
repeats
infinitely?" except, by allowing that, you've put a limit on it, saying it
repeats infinitely
and called it done, but infinite means there is always a next one. The set
of integers,
for instance, is infinite.
But there are an infinite number of real numbers that are not integers and
therefore are not going to be included in the infinity of integers. Only
integers belong to that set. The set of all integers is an infinite, but
bounded, set. There are no non-integers that are possioble within the
infinity of integers. Thus, there may be rules that must be obeyed by all
possibilities in the multiverse, even when the number of possibilities
within that multiverse are infinite.


irrelevant.

A
The first insightful description of yourself I've ever heard from you.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

did you think I was referring to myself? Why did you think that?
Because you are irrelevant.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

Really?

Do you always try so hard to defeat people in argument who are irrelevant?
The fact that you think this is "try[ing] so hard" says volumes for
both your level of inability and for your irrelevance.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

the fact that you try so hard speaks volumes for your need to be taken
seriously.
The fact of how you define "hard" speaks volumes for your laughable
inexperience.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3


Which aspect of my experience is laughable Erwin?

Your lack of it.

Combined with your poor reading skills.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3



So what part of my inexperience do you find funny and how do you
quantify it?

A
Back to top
Archangelska
science forum beginner


Joined: 28 Apr 2006
Posts: 36

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 2:10 pm    Post subject: Re: A theory of magick, and the importance of catholic belief. Reply with quote

Erwin Hessle wrote:
Quote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Tom wrote:
"Martin Swain" <martin_swain@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:M0irg.43622$B91.23488@edtnps82...
"2" <nhoj@droffats.ten> wrote in message
news:12ar11ohlehra9@news.supernews.com...
Infinity means just exactly that - unbounded, endless possible universes.
Surely one of them has physics our impoverished imagination cannot
conceive of, and that includes the universe which does not have persons
who are stuck in decision-split concepts, or persons at all!

Yes that's right. Using the idea here defined a decision point, over
an infinite span of decisions all possibilities would occur. Why? Because
that's what infinite means. Someone could say "yes, but what if it just
repeats
infinitely?" except, by allowing that, you've put a limit on it, saying it
repeats infinitely
and called it done, but infinite means there is always a next one. The set
of integers,
for instance, is infinite.
But there are an infinite number of real numbers that are not integers and
therefore are not going to be included in the infinity of integers. Only
integers belong to that set. The set of all integers is an infinite, but
bounded, set. There are no non-integers that are possioble within the
infinity of integers. Thus, there may be rules that must be obeyed by all
possibilities in the multiverse, even when the number of possibilities
within that multiverse are infinite.


irrelevant.

A
The first insightful description of yourself I've ever heard from you.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

did you think I was referring to myself? Why did you think that?
Because you are irrelevant.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

Really?

Do you always try so hard to defeat people in argument who are irrelevant?
The fact that you think this is "try[ing] so hard" says volumes for
both your level of inability and for your irrelevance.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

the fact that you try so hard speaks volumes for your need to be taken
seriously.
The fact of how you define "hard" speaks volumes for your laughable
inexperience.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3


Which aspect of my experience is laughable Erwin?

Your lack of it.

Combined with your poor reading skills.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3



Apologes, this is an afterthought...

tell you what Erwin. Why not put full descriotions of your lat 3 magical
Operations on paper so we can see what they look like. Then let the
experienced occultists in here have a look and analyse them for veracity.

*Your* experiences mind, not someone else's you read about... be
prepared to be examined on your accounts.

This ought to be quite interesting Erwin, it's time to put up...

A

A
Back to top
Douglas
science forum beginner


Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 22

PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:15 am    Post subject: Re: A theory of magick, and the importance of catholic belief. Reply with quote

Martin Swain wrote:
Quote:
Tom wrote:

"Martin Swain" <martin_swain@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:EEurg.104898$A8.77925@clgrps12...


Tom wrote:




I have said all I am ever
going to on this subject.



For some reason I doubt this.

-Douglas
Back to top
Douglas
science forum beginner


Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 22

PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:30 am    Post subject: Re: A theory of magick, and the importance of catholic belief. Reply with quote

Archangel wrote:
Quote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:

Archangel wrote:

Erwin Hessle wrote:

2 wrote:

"Tom" <askpermission@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:R_udnZoRSdU1ojDZnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@comcast.com...

"2" <nhoj@droffats.ten> wrote:

First, if there is an infinity-of-universes then anything you can
imagine
exists in one of them. It is a necessary truth. So be comforted
that
somewhere you are correct, but not here and now.

Well, not *anything* you can imagine. For example, you might
imagine that
the laws of the multiverse work differently than they really do. No
matter how many decision-splits there are in the multiverse, the
laws of
the multiverse must necessarily be obeyed since each one of the
decision-splits must conform to the laws governing those splits. No
amount of variations on possible themes will result in the impossible
happening.

Infinity means just exactly that - unbounded, endless possible
universes.

No it doesn't. There could be three distinct universes infinitely
repeated, for all you know.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

Which is different from a endless possible Universes wich is what the OP
stated. Correctly.


Except that's not what he stated. What he actually stated was
"infinity-of-universes."

Do learn to read, fuckwit. I know it's not your strong point, but do
try.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3


Do you feel there is a pressing need for unpleasantness? If you do,
where do you think this need comes from?

A

Ask yourself the same question troll, liar and fraud.

-Douglas
Back to top
Ammon
science forum beginner


Joined: 27 Jun 2006
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:32 am    Post subject: Re: A theory of magick, and the importance of catholic belief. Reply with quote

Douglas wrote:
Quote:


Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:

Archangel wrote:

Erwin Hessle wrote:

2 wrote:

"Tom" <askpermission@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:R_udnZoRSdU1ojDZnZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@comcast.com...

"2" <nhoj@droffats.ten> wrote:

First, if there is an infinity-of-universes then anything you
can imagine
exists in one of them. It is a necessary truth. So be comforted
that
somewhere you are correct, but not here and now.

Well, not *anything* you can imagine. For example, you might
imagine that
the laws of the multiverse work differently than they really do. No
matter how many decision-splits there are in the multiverse, the
laws of
the multiverse must necessarily be obeyed since each one of the
decision-splits must conform to the laws governing those splits. No
amount of variations on possible themes will result in the
impossible
happening.

Infinity means just exactly that - unbounded, endless possible
universes.

No it doesn't. There could be three distinct universes infinitely
repeated, for all you know.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

Which is different from a endless possible Universes wich is what
the OP
stated. Correctly.


Except that's not what he stated. What he actually stated was
"infinity-of-universes."

Do learn to read, fuckwit. I know it's not your strong point, but do
try.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3


Do you feel there is a pressing need for unpleasantness? If you do,
where do you think this need comes from?

A

Ask yourself the same question troll, liar and fraud.

-Douglas



QED.

A
Back to top
Douglas
science forum beginner


Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 22

PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:50 am    Post subject: Re: A theory of magick, and the importance of catholic belief. Reply with quote

Archangel wrote:
Quote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:

Archangel wrote:

Erwin Hessle wrote:

Archangel wrote:

Erwin Hessle wrote:

2 wrote:

"Erwin Hessle" <erwin@erwinhessle.com> wrote:

No it doesn't. There could be three distinct universes infinitely
repeated, for all you know.

That was not the posit, you moron. The posit was an infinity of
universes.

Three distinct universes repeated an infinite number of times *is* an
infinity of universes, cockfag.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3

But not an infinite number of possible universes as the OP stated. Do
you not really understand the distinction?

Do you really not understand the wisdom of actually reading the post
you are pretending to quote before doing so to me?

That old inability to quote defect of yours is rearing it's head again.

No surprises there, then.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3


Shrug, a quick survey of the previous posts to try and render some help
to you when you seemed to be having trouble handling the intellectual
side of the argument. I admit to carelessness in this regard. But not
intellectual laziness, or an inability to understand the issues. Oddly
enough I dont peruse every word of your arguments, looking for the
wisdom therein. Not enough return on the investment.


That's a lot of words to admit you're a twat.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3



I am sure you think that is rational. What was the logic behind that
conclusion? I only ask because it probably isnt the conclusion that most
people would draw from the words... how did you draw that conclusion?

A

From a years worth of posts from you dumbass.

YOu think everyone's memory is as bad as yours.

-Douglas
Back to top
Douglas
science forum beginner


Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 22

PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:50 am    Post subject: Re: A theory of magick, and the importance of catholic belief. Reply with quote

Archangel wrote:
Quote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:

Archangel wrote:

Tom wrote:

"Martin Swain" <martin_swain@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:M0irg.43622$B91.23488@edtnps82...

"2" <nhoj@droffats.ten> wrote in message
news:12ar11ohlehra9@news.supernews.com...

Infinity means just exactly that - unbounded, endless possible
universes.
Surely one of them has physics our impoverished imagination cannot
conceive of, and that includes the universe which does not have
persons
who are stuck in decision-split concepts, or persons at all!

Yes that's right. Using the idea here defined a decision point, over
an infinite span of decisions all possibilities would occur. Why?
Because
that's what infinite means. Someone could say "yes, but what if it
just
repeats
infinitely?" except, by allowing that, you've put a limit on it,
saying it
repeats infinitely
and called it done, but infinite means there is always a next one.
The set
of integers,
for instance, is infinite.

But there are an infinite number of real numbers that are not
integers and
therefore are not going to be included in the infinity of integers.
Only
integers belong to that set. The set of all integers is an
infinite, but
bounded, set. There are no non-integers that are possioble within the
infinity of integers. Thus, there may be rules that must be obeyed
by all
possibilities in the multiverse, even when the number of possibilities
within that multiverse are infinite.



irrelevant.

A


The first insightful description of yourself I've ever heard from you.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3



did you think I was referring to myself? Why did you think that?

A

Well, if the shoe fits... and it fits you perfectly.

-Douglas
Back to top
Ammon
science forum beginner


Joined: 27 Jun 2006
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:53 am    Post subject: Re: A theory of magick, and the importance of catholic belief. Reply with quote

Douglas wrote:
Quote:


Archangel wrote:
Erwin Hessle wrote:

Archangel wrote:

Tom wrote:

"Martin Swain" <martin_swain@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:M0irg.43622$B91.23488@edtnps82...

"2" <nhoj@droffats.ten> wrote in message
news:12ar11ohlehra9@news.supernews.com...

Infinity means just exactly that - unbounded, endless possible
universes.
Surely one of them has physics our impoverished imagination cannot
conceive of, and that includes the universe which does not have
persons
who are stuck in decision-split concepts, or persons at all!

Yes that's right. Using the idea here defined a decision point, over
an infinite span of decisions all possibilities would occur. Why?
Because
that's what infinite means. Someone could say "yes, but what if it
just
repeats
infinitely?" except, by allowing that, you've put a limit on it,
saying it
repeats infinitely
and called it done, but infinite means there is always a next one.
The set
of integers,
for instance, is infinite.

But there are an infinite number of real numbers that are not
integers and
therefore are not going to be included in the infinity of
integers. Only
integers belong to that set. The set of all integers is an
infinite, but
bounded, set. There are no non-integers that are possioble within the
infinity of integers. Thus, there may be rules that must be obeyed
by all
possibilities in the multiverse, even when the number of possibilities
within that multiverse are infinite.



irrelevant.

A


The first insightful description of yourself I've ever heard from you.

Erwin Hessle, 8=3



did you think I was referring to myself? Why did you think that?

A

Well, if the shoe fits... and it fits you perfectly.

-Douglas



So you say and I know you think it is true.

A
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 6 of 8 [111 Posts] Goto page:  Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Next
View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Mon Dec 18, 2017 5:17 am | All times are GMT
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts unified theory gb6724 New Theories 4 Fri Jul 21, 2006 5:25 am
No new posts Signal Nonlocality Loophole in Quantum Theory? Jack Sarfatti Math 0 Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:59 am
No new posts A Combinatorics/Graph Theory Question mathlover Undergraduate 1 Wed Jul 19, 2006 11:30 pm
No new posts A Combinatorics/Graph Theory Question mathlover Math 2 Wed Jul 19, 2006 11:02 pm
No new posts A Combinatorics/Graph Theory Question mathlover Combinatorics 0 Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:58 pm

Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Electronics forum |  Medicine forum |  Unix/Linux blog |  Unix/Linux documentation |  Unix/Linux forums  |  send newsletters
 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.1835s ][ Queries: 16 (0.1470s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]