FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » Science and Technology » Math
point estimation of variance
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [2 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Eli Luong
science forum beginner


Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 12:23 am    Post subject: point estimation of variance Reply with quote

I was given two different equations to calculate the variance from a
sample. The equation is as follows:

(sum_of (Xi - x_bar)^2) / ( n -1 )

It's taking the sum of the square of the difference between each x_i
and the average value, then dividing by (n-1).

The mle, maximum likelihood estimation, was the same, but (n-1) was
substituted with an n.

I was wondering under what conditions would I use to determine which
one to use. The first is unbiased, and the second is not, but the
second is the mle, whereas the first is not.

Thanks,
- Eli
Back to top
Herman Rubin
science forum Guru


Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 730

PostPosted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 7:30 pm    Post subject: Re: point estimation of variance Reply with quote

In article <1151540625.550114.253590@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
Eli Luong <eliluong@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
I was given two different equations to calculate the variance from a
sample. The equation is as follows:

(sum_of (Xi - x_bar)^2) / ( n -1 )

It's taking the sum of the square of the difference between each x_i
and the average value, then dividing by (n-1).

The mle, maximum likelihood estimation, was the same, but (n-1) was
substituted with an n.

I was wondering under what conditions would I use to determine which
one to use. The first is unbiased, and the second is not, but the
second is the mle, whereas the first is not.

It depends on the use. If one wants the best estimate
from the standpoint of mean squared error, divide by n+1.

The advantage of dividing by n-1 is that this can be used
for further purposes. A classic paper of Neyman and Scott
considers the case in which one has samples of size n_j
with means mu_j but a common variance v. The mle of v
is

\sum (sum_of (Xij - x_bar_j)^2) / \sum n_j

which is not a good estimator, but replacing n_j by n_j-1 is.
--
This address is for information only. I do not claim that these views
are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University.
Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University
hrubin@stat.purdue.edu Phone: (765)494-6054 FAX: (765)494-0558
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [2 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:47 am | All times are GMT
Forum index » Science and Technology » Math
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts Uniform point picking on a hexagon, e... Olw Math 3 Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:21 pm
No new posts Point Defects in Emergent Vacuum ODLR... Jack Sarfatti Math 0 Tue Jul 18, 2006 10:52 pm
No new posts Tarski fixed-point theorem William Elliot Math 14 Tue Jul 18, 2006 10:24 am
No new posts How to combine the results of two Max... comtech Math 1 Tue Jul 11, 2006 7:42 am
No new posts what estimation methods can replace M... gino Math 8 Fri Jul 07, 2006 6:02 am

Debt Consolidation | Credit Card Menu | Mortgage | Personal Finance | Looking for Credit Cards?
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Electronics forum |  Medicine forum |  Unix/Linux blog |  Unix/Linux documentation |  Unix/Linux forums


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.3872s ][ Queries: 16 (0.2774s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]