FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics » Particle
(On studying Fine Particle Physics) Quote from Rev. 3.2 of 'Standard Behavior Of Criminal Minds' - {HRI 20030509-V3.2}
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [1 Post] View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Leonardo Been
science forum beginner


Joined: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 3:39 am    Post subject: (On studying Fine Particle Physics) Quote from Rev. 3.2 of 'Standard Behavior Of Criminal Minds' - {HRI 20030509-V3.2} Reply with quote

(On studying Fine Particle Physics)

Standard Behavior Of Criminal Minds

9 May 2003
{HRI 20030509-V3.2}

(Version 3.2
on 6 Jan 2006)

'

It is standard practice of Criminal Minds,

to try and avoid discussing the issues at hand,

which issue, in one example, happened to be, to discuss, to
understand and to expose their spiritual activity,

their (hideous and continuous) spiritual Crimes on
you, including the Crime on you of destroying your
and other people's awareness of them,
*(1)(2)(4Cool(49)

Crimes that were queried at the occasion of someone
who reported, that

she was being hit during her sleep 'as if
struck by a hammer,' by someone Energetically,
(by a Criminal Mind) and from which Energetic
blow she then woke up. *(1)

'

'

The phenomenon, of Criminal Minds very loudly trying to avoid
discussing the ACTUAL issue - side-tracking it instead - is
common; and

all people who have something worthwhile to say or to discuss to
increase understanding, have to face "respondents" who are
pretending to "respond" "on the subject,"

but these "respondents" "respond" exactly in order NOT to
have the actual subject matter seen, looked at, discussed
and understood.

'

'
It is not just what they say, but it is often easier
to detect them by what they DO NOT SAY and by what
they are NOT interested in to take up or know about.
*(3)

You better look for the things they do NOT
mention or do NOT (want to) know, things that
they
- staying with the actual importances of
the subject matter -

should be expected to take up or want to know,

ESPECIALLY expected from someone who
claims to be an expert or authority on,
or who claims to be very interested in
the subject or in the well-being of
people, of you... *(10)

'

Several Criminal Minds became famous scientists or
researchers or philosophers, or generals or
politicians and heads of state, or they became gurus,
'holinesses' or religious leaders, or artists in any
field of art, *(26)*(31)

exactly with THAT purpose, to be in a position
to actively PREVENT the understanding of the
subject they were dealing with or in charge of,
or representing. *(37)

'

I have studied them in great detail, and I published for
you very precise ways of recognizing and understanding

not only what, but also WHY they so fiercely fight
and use all their intelligence, and "facts" *(3)

- and how they aid those of the same ilk - *(4)

to prevent themselves from being understood:

Their actual intentions and motives, and
the condition of their soul, which is hard
if not impossible to understand or even to
imagine, for any normal person. *(5)
___________
Quoted from:

'Standard Behavior Of Criminal Minds' - {HRI 20030509-V3.2}

written by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher and poet

_________________________
Published Version is V3.1:

'Standard Behavior Of Criminal Minds' {HRI 20030509-V3.1}
(9 May 2003 - Version 3.1 on 2 Dec 2004)
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.arts.fine/msg/a83e5c14a4cbf0b3?fcw=1
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.europe/msg/18cf685cdd5b76f1?fwc=1
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [1 Post] View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Fri Aug 18, 2017 2:35 pm | All times are GMT
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics » Particle
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts Compare and contrast physics and chemistry parent Chem 0 Mon Jan 08, 2007 4:26 pm
No new posts WHO KILLED PHYSICS: CLAUSIUS OR EINSTEIN? Pentcho Valev Relativity 7 Thu Jul 20, 2006 8:24 am
No new posts Trying to Understand the Set Theory of Non-Standard Analysis Math1723 Math 1 Wed Jul 19, 2006 3:52 am
No new posts This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 235) John Baez Research 0 Mon Jul 17, 2006 3:32 pm
No new posts Writing physics for the public and other matters - parano... Jack Sarfatti Math 0 Sat Jul 15, 2006 6:29 pm

Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Electronics forum |  Medicine forum |  Unix/Linux blog |  Unix/Linux documentation |  Unix/Linux forums  |  send newsletters
 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.0198s ][ Queries: 16 (0.0046s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]