FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » Science and Technology » Math
John Cramer's Type II Transaction explains low entropy of universe?
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [1 Post] View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Jack Sarfatti
science forum Guru

Joined: 29 Apr 2005
Posts: 487

PostPosted: Sat Jul 01, 2006 8:49 pm    Post subject: John Cramer's Type II Transaction explains low entropy of universe? Reply with quote

Fallout from the historic breakthrough AAAS USD "Solvay"-type meeting on

OK Cramer points out that Hoyle & Narlikar have a Feynman path integral
formalism and PCW Davies has an S-Matrix formalism that essentially back
up his heuristic TI picture. Let's assume that is so for the time being.

It's also clear that we have freedom to impose different phase-matching
conditions at each end of a transaction between past and future leading
to new physics possibilities.

Cramer's Type I has the back-FROM-the-future advanced waves from both
past emitter and future absorber prior to the emission canceling in
destructive interference (pi radian phase shift) and he has an argument
for the matching of the intensities. Similarly for complete cancellation
of the retarded waves from both emitter and absorber to future of the
absorption event. There is constructive interference of the retarded
offer history wave with the advanced echo destiny wave between emitter
and absorber giving effective past --> future retarded causality for the
actual transaction with propagation of energy-momentum-angular
momentum-spin etc. between the two events ON THE CLASSICAL FORWARD LIGHT
CONE of the emitter.

I did not realize that Cramer has also a dual Type II process that he
mistakenly threw away in 1980. It is that Type II process that may
explain the low entropy of the early universe that sorely vexes Roger
Penrose in "The Road to Reality," Garrett Moddell (U. Colo Boulder)
pointed out that reception of advanced signals lowers the entropy of the
receiver. This is just what Isador Rabi ordered! The advanced signals
seem to shoot right back to the initial Big Bang singularity in Cramer's
Type II process in which the above Type I is INVERTED i.e. no
transaction between emitter and absorber.

Cramer's explanation of EPR seems OK for photon pairs, but it is not
obvious that it will work for electron, neutron pairs etc. However, if
he is correct about Hoyle-Narlikar's & Davies's independent
generalizations of Wheeler-Feynman classical action at a distance
electrodynamics to any kind of correlated quantum matter waves in
configuration space then that will probably work as well though we need
to work through the details.
Back to top

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [1 Post] View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Mon Feb 18, 2019 8:24 am | All times are GMT
Forum index » Science and Technology » Math
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts randomized Donsker-type results gasparuk Math 1 Tue Jul 18, 2006 1:46 pm
No new posts Integrate erf type expression Pratim Vakish num-analysis 4 Mon Jul 17, 2006 2:27 pm
No new posts Large deviations principles of Non-Freidlin-Wentzell type. jaykov1 Research 0 Sat Jul 08, 2006 11:31 pm
No new posts How to measure the size of Universe! studyandjobs@yahoo.com Relativity 3 Sat Jul 08, 2006 1:53 pm
No new posts What The Higgs Field Does For the Universe G=EMC^2 Glazier New Theories 0 Sat Jul 08, 2006 1:47 pm

Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Electronics forum |  Medicine forum |  Unix/Linux blog |  Unix/Linux documentation |  Unix/Linux forums  |  send newsletters

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.0133s ][ Queries: 16 (0.0022s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]