Author 
Message 
Cetir science forum beginner
Joined: 02 Jul 2006
Posts: 3

Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 11:31 am Post subject:
"Gravity"



"Gravity"
Like almost everyone else, the writer started by assuming that General
Relativity represented good science and that it was his task to understand
that science. Almost immediately it became obvious that a flaw must exist
somewhere in its derivation. Allegedly, General Relativity and Special
Relativity followed The Principle of Equivalence but THEIR CONCLUSIONS WERE
NOT EQUIVALENT! In a ForceLengthTime systems of units, Special Relativity
and General Relativity provided:
Dimensional Entity Special Relativity General Relativity
Force(F) 1 1
Length(L) 1/(1V^2/C^2)^0.5 1
Time(T) (1V^2/C^2)^0.5 G*M1*M2/(R*C)^2
Where (1$) is the gravitational time dilation of General Relativity.
One does not need to be a rocket scientist to recognize that these
transformations are NOT ANALOGOUS. Under Special Relativity, the
transformations for length and time are reciprocal. Under General Relativity
such a reciprocal relationship does not exist since the transformations for
length does not exist.
It is the lack of such a reciprocal relationship that made it
impossible for Dr. Einstein to solve the equations of General Relativity in
terms of our familiar three dimensional Euclidean space. After struggling
with the problem for about 18 months, he asserted that space was not three
dimensional Euclidean but was curved into an unobservable fourth spatial
dimension! He did not go back to see where a rather naive mathematical error
was preventing the solution. This crutch allowed the mathematical equations
to be solved since they added the degree of freedom that his error hid. The
idea of "curved space" was accepted because "no one can prove it isn't
curved". This is hardly a responsible justification for accepting a physical
theory!
Since I wished to understand gravitation, I proceeded to derive the
nature of the gravitational field by using two completely different and
independent methods. ("There is more than one way to skin a cat.") Under
both of these derivations, the following transformations were found:
Dimensional Entity Special Relativity General Relativity
Force(F) 1 1
Length(L) 1/(1V^2/C^2)^0.5 1/G*M1*M2/(R*C)^2
Time(T) (1V^2/C^2)^0.5 G*M1*M2/(R*C)^2
These results satisfies the Principle of Equivalence since it provides
reciprocal relationship between the transformations for length and time.
These results yield a solution which is consistent with three dimensional
Euclidean space. (Recent cosmological observations have shown that the space
represented by the Universe as a whole is not "curved", it is three
dimensional Euclidean.)
The correct derivation of gravitational theory described is provided
in http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm. The test for its validity is whether
it agrees with both the results of observation and the results of
theoretical derivations. The material presented passes this test. It agrees
with the observations which are alleged to have verified General Relativity.
The Sun's gravitational field is about 5 orders of magnitude too weak to
reveal the difference between the two approaches. Observations of strong
gravitational fields, such as around neutron stars, cannot differentiate
between the theories without a close up observations of orbital parameters.
Such a verification must await the availability of Star Trek's Warp Drive.
The advantage of the revised approach is that, among other results, it
reveals the source of gravitational energy (force), allows the total energy
of the Universe to remain constant over time, eliminates the idea of a
singularities (no black holes), and explains the creation of Universes. The
topics covered are:
Summary of "Gravity"
Chapter Titles
1:  Introduction
2:  Laying the Groundwork
3:  Evaluating the Gravitational Conversion Factors
4:  Comparison with the "Real World"
5:  The Complete Gravitational Field
There are 50,000 words and 22 diagrams.
EVERYTHING WHICH WE ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING
ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS,
AND IT MUST BE MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET
THIS REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP
FROM THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.
All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at
http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.
Please make any response via Email as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.
Email: einsteinhoax@isp.com. If you wish a reply, be sure that your
mail reception is not blocked.
The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided. 

Back to top 


dan.echegoyen@gmail.com science forum beginner
Joined: 30 Jun 2006
Posts: 3

Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 2:53 pm Post subject:
Re: "Gravity"



For a nonmathematical explicit description of gravity, see my book,
free on the web:
www.structureofexistence.com
Cetir wrote:
Quote:  "Gravity"
Like almost everyone else, the writer started by assuming that General
Relativity represented good science and that it was his task to understand
that science. Almost immediately it became obvious that a flaw must exist
somewhere in its derivation. Allegedly, General Relativity and Special
Relativity followed The Principle of Equivalence but THEIR CONCLUSIONS WERE
NOT EQUIVALENT! In a ForceLengthTime systems of units, Special Relativity
and General Relativity provided:
Dimensional Entity Special Relativity General Relativity
Force(F) 1 1
Length(L) 1/(1V^2/C^2)^0.5 1
Time(T) (1V^2/C^2)^0.5 G*M1*M2/(R*C)^2
Where (1$) is the gravitational time dilation of General Relativity.
One does not need to be a rocket scientist to recognize that these
transformations are NOT ANALOGOUS. Under Special Relativity, the
transformations for length and time are reciprocal. Under General Relativity
such a reciprocal relationship does not exist since the transformations for
length does not exist.
It is the lack of such a reciprocal relationship that made it
impossible for Dr. Einstein to solve the equations of General Relativity in
terms of our familiar three dimensional Euclidean space. After struggling
with the problem for about 18 months, he asserted that space was not three
dimensional Euclidean but was curved into an unobservable fourth spatial
dimension! He did not go back to see where a rather naive mathematical error
was preventing the solution. This crutch allowed the mathematical equations
to be solved since they added the degree of freedom that his error hid. The
idea of "curved space" was accepted because "no one can prove it isn't
curved". This is hardly a responsible justification for accepting a physical
theory!
Since I wished to understand gravitation, I proceeded to derive the
nature of the gravitational field by using two completely different and
independent methods. ("There is more than one way to skin a cat.") Under
both of these derivations, the following transformations were found:
Dimensional Entity Special Relativity General Relativity
Force(F) 1 1
Length(L) 1/(1V^2/C^2)^0.5 1/G*M1*M2/(R*C)^2
Time(T) (1V^2/C^2)^0.5 G*M1*M2/(R*C)^2
These results satisfies the Principle of Equivalence since it provides
reciprocal relationship between the transformations for length and time.
These results yield a solution which is consistent with three dimensional
Euclidean space. (Recent cosmological observations have shown that the space
represented by the Universe as a whole is not "curved", it is three
dimensional Euclidean.)
The correct derivation of gravitational theory described is provided
in http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm. The test for its validity is whether
it agrees with both the results of observation and the results of
theoretical derivations. The material presented passes this test. It agrees
with the observations which are alleged to have verified General Relativity.
The Sun's gravitational field is about 5 orders of magnitude too weak to
reveal the difference between the two approaches. Observations of strong
gravitational fields, such as around neutron stars, cannot differentiate
between the theories without a close up observations of orbital parameters.
Such a verification must await the availability of Star Trek's Warp Drive.
The advantage of the revised approach is that, among other results, it
reveals the source of gravitational energy (force), allows the total energy
of the Universe to remain constant over time, eliminates the idea of a
singularities (no black holes), and explains the creation of Universes. The
topics covered are:
Summary of "Gravity"
Chapter Titles
1:  Introduction
2:  Laying the Groundwork
3:  Evaluating the Gravitational Conversion Factors
4:  Comparison with the "Real World"
5:  The Complete Gravitational Field
There are 50,000 words and 22 diagrams.
EVERYTHING WHICH WE ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING
ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS,
AND IT MUST BE MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET
THIS REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP
FROM THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.
All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at
http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.
Please make any response via Email as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.
Email: einsteinhoax@isp.com. If you wish a reply, be sure that your
mail reception is not blocked.
The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided. 


Back to top 


Google


Back to top 



The time now is Thu Aug 17, 2017 3:50 am  All times are GMT

