|
|
| Author |
Message |
muser
science forum addict
Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 67
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 10:34 am Post subject:
Particles bombarding earth's atomsphere
|
|
|
I read recently about the discovery of a particle with a 50eV charge
hitting the earth's atomsphere. Can anyone provide a link to where this
is being studied. If such particles come from quasars or supernovas,
how are they able to retain so much of their energy? And if they lose
energy are there any reasonable assumptions as to how much charge they
originally possessed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phineas T Puddleduck
science forum Guru
Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Posts: 759
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 4:24 pm Post subject:
Re: Particles bombarding earth's atomsphere
|
|
|
In article <1152095642.565658.169940@l70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
muser <charlie12345@hotmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | I read recently about the discovery of a particle with a 50eV charge
hitting the earth's atomsphere. Can anyone provide a link to where this
is being studied. If such particles come from quasars or supernovas,
how are they able to retain so much of their energy? And if they lose
energy are there any reasonable assumptions as to how much charge they
originally possessed.
|
Why would they lose charge?
--
Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bullshit repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE SCIENCE".
Please pay no attention to my butt poking forward, it is expanding.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
PWNER of Vert and TomGee since 2006
"I don't know that much math." - tomgee; 2 April 2006
"I don't claim to know what I'm talking about" - tomgee; 10 May 2006
PWNED
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Puddlefuck tou are on my kill file. Good bye" - Vert admits he cannot
calculate \gamma for a photon and admits defeat - 2nd July 2006
PWNED
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PD
science forum Guru
Joined: 03 May 2005
Posts: 4363
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 6:19 pm Post subject:
Re: Particles bombarding earth's atomsphere
|
|
|
muser wrote:
| Quote: | I read recently about the discovery of a particle with a 50eV charge
|
50 eV is an energy, not a charge, and not much energy to boot.
Might be good to recheck the reading to find out what it really said.
| Quote: | hitting the earth's atomsphere. Can anyone provide a link to where this
is being studied. If such particles come from quasars or supernovas,
how are they able to retain so much of their energy?
|
Why would they lose energy? Things generally don't lose energy unless
something else acts to take it away -- e.g. friction.
| Quote: | And if they lose
energy are there any reasonable assumptions as to how much charge they
originally possessed. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
muser
science forum addict
Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 67
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 3:43 am Post subject:
Re: Particles bombarding earth's atomsphere
|
|
|
PD wrote:
| Quote: | muser wrote:
I read recently about the discovery of a particle with a 50eV charge
50 eV is an energy, not a charge, and not much energy to boot.
Might be good to recheck the reading to find out what it really said.
hitting the earth's atomsphere. Can anyone provide a link to where this
is being studied. If such particles come from quasars or supernovas,
how are they able to retain so much of their energy?
Why would they lose energy? Things generally don't lose energy unless
something else acts to take it away -- e.g. friction.
And if they lose
energy are there any reasonable assumptions as to how much charge they
originally possessed.
|
I gave an arbitrary figure for the eV. 1TeV would have been excessive.
These particles must come into contact with other celestial
bodies\particles where there will be loses in energy. Google searches
have prove fruitless on this topic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PD
science forum Guru
Joined: 03 May 2005
Posts: 4363
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 7:01 pm Post subject:
Re: Particles bombarding earth's atomsphere
|
|
|
muser wrote:
| Quote: | PD wrote:
muser wrote:
I read recently about the discovery of a particle with a 50eV charge
50 eV is an energy, not a charge, and not much energy to boot.
Might be good to recheck the reading to find out what it really said.
hitting the earth's atomsphere. Can anyone provide a link to where this
is being studied. If such particles come from quasars or supernovas,
how are they able to retain so much of their energy?
Why would they lose energy? Things generally don't lose energy unless
something else acts to take it away -- e.g. friction.
And if they lose
energy are there any reasonable assumptions as to how much charge they
originally possessed.
I gave an arbitrary figure for the eV. 1TeV would have been excessive.
These particles must come into contact with other celestial
bodies\particles where there will be loses in energy. Google searches
have prove fruitless on this topic.
|
OK, let me see if I have this right. You don't remember what you read,
so you made up a number rather than looking it up. You don't know
whether eV measures charge or energy. You assume that everything MUST
encounter celestial particles and lose energy in that process. Have you
considered reading something other than the internet?
PD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
muser
science forum addict
Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 67
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 8:54 am Post subject:
Re: Particles bombarding earth's atomsphere
|
|
|
PD wrote:
| Quote: | muser wrote:
PD wrote:
muser wrote:
I read recently about the discovery of a particle with a 50eV charge
50 eV is an energy, not a charge, and not much energy to boot.
Might be good to recheck the reading to find out what it really said.
hitting the earth's atomsphere. Can anyone provide a link to where this
is being studied. If such particles come from quasars or supernovas,
how are they able to retain so much of their energy?
Why would they lose energy? Things generally don't lose energy unless
something else acts to take it away -- e.g. friction.
And if they lose
energy are there any reasonable assumptions as to how much charge they
originally possessed.
I gave an arbitrary figure for the eV. 1TeV would have been excessive.
These particles must come into contact with other celestial
bodies\particles where there will be loses in energy. Google searches
have prove fruitless on this topic.
OK, let me see if I have this right. You don't remember what you read,
so you made up a number rather than looking it up. You don't know
whether eV measures charge or energy. You assume that everything MUST
encounter celestial particles and lose energy in that process. Have you
considered reading something other than the internet?
|
If you can't answer the question why not ignore my post, simple!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
muser
science forum addict
Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 67
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 8:54 am Post subject:
Re: Particles bombarding earth's atomsphere
|
|
|
PD wrote:
| Quote: | muser wrote:
PD wrote:
muser wrote:
I read recently about the discovery of a particle with a 50eV charge
50 eV is an energy, not a charge, and not much energy to boot.
Might be good to recheck the reading to find out what it really said.
hitting the earth's atomsphere. Can anyone provide a link to where this
is being studied. If such particles come from quasars or supernovas,
how are they able to retain so much of their energy?
Why would they lose energy? Things generally don't lose energy unless
something else acts to take it away -- e.g. friction.
And if they lose
energy are there any reasonable assumptions as to how much charge they
originally possessed.
I gave an arbitrary figure for the eV. 1TeV would have been excessive.
These particles must come into contact with other celestial
bodies\particles where there will be loses in energy. Google searches
have prove fruitless on this topic.
OK, let me see if I have this right. You don't remember what you read,
so you made up a number rather than looking it up. You don't know
whether eV measures charge or energy. You assume that everything MUST
encounter celestial particles and lose energy in that process. Have you
considered reading something other than the internet?
|
If you can't answer the question why not ignore my post, simple!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phineas T Puddleduck
science forum Guru
Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Posts: 759
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 12:39 pm Post subject:
Re: Particles bombarding earth's atomsphere
|
|
|
On 8/7/06 09:54, in article
1152348856.458582.11070@s13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, "muser"
<charlie12345@hotmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
PD wrote:
muser wrote:
PD wrote:
muser wrote:
I read recently about the discovery of a particle with a 50eV charge
50 eV is an energy, not a charge, and not much energy to boot.
Might be good to recheck the reading to find out what it really said.
hitting the earth's atomsphere. Can anyone provide a link to where this
is being studied. If such particles come from quasars or supernovas,
how are they able to retain so much of their energy?
Why would they lose energy? Things generally don't lose energy unless
something else acts to take it away -- e.g. friction.
And if they lose
energy are there any reasonable assumptions as to how much charge they
originally possessed.
I gave an arbitrary figure for the eV. 1TeV would have been excessive.
These particles must come into contact with other celestial
bodies\particles where there will be loses in energy. Google searches
have prove fruitless on this topic.
OK, let me see if I have this right. You don't remember what you read,
so you made up a number rather than looking it up. You don't know
whether eV measures charge or energy. You assume that everything MUST
encounter celestial particles and lose energy in that process. Have you
considered reading something other than the internet?
If you can't answer the question why not ignore my post, simple!
PD
|
You DON'T have a question
--
Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bullshit repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orange jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson
Why parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE
SCIENCE". Pay no attention to my butt poking forward, it is expanding.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
TomGee proves his physics education is beyond measure...
"I don't know that much math." - 2 April 2006
"I don't claim to know what I'm talking about" - 10 May 2006
"There is no such thing as relativistic momentum" - July 2006
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Puddlefuck tou are on my kill file. Good bye" - Vert admits he cannot
calculate \gamma for a photon and admits defeat - 2nd July 2006
PWNED
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PD
science forum Guru
Joined: 03 May 2005
Posts: 4363
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 12:44 pm Post subject:
Re: Particles bombarding earth's atomsphere
|
|
|
muser wrote:
| Quote: | PD wrote:
muser wrote:
PD wrote:
muser wrote:
I read recently about the discovery of a particle with a 50eV charge
50 eV is an energy, not a charge, and not much energy to boot.
Might be good to recheck the reading to find out what it really said.
hitting the earth's atomsphere. Can anyone provide a link to where this
is being studied. If such particles come from quasars or supernovas,
how are they able to retain so much of their energy?
Why would they lose energy? Things generally don't lose energy unless
something else acts to take it away -- e.g. friction.
And if they lose
energy are there any reasonable assumptions as to how much charge they
originally possessed.
I gave an arbitrary figure for the eV. 1TeV would have been excessive.
These particles must come into contact with other celestial
bodies\particles where there will be loses in energy. Google searches
have prove fruitless on this topic.
OK, let me see if I have this right. You don't remember what you read,
so you made up a number rather than looking it up. You don't know
whether eV measures charge or energy. You assume that everything MUST
encounter celestial particles and lose energy in that process. Have you
considered reading something other than the internet?
If you can't answer the question why not ignore my post, simple!
|
That's why I responded to your post, to clarify your question. When I
found out that you had no idea what you were asking, I pointed that
out.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
muser
science forum addict
Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 67
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 9:59 pm Post subject:
Re: Particles bombarding earth's atomsphere
|
|
|
PD wrote:
| Quote: | muser wrote:
PD wrote:
muser wrote:
PD wrote:
muser wrote:
I read recently about the discovery of a particle with a 50eV charge
50 eV is an energy, not a charge, and not much energy to boot.
Might be good to recheck the reading to find out what it really said.
hitting the earth's atomsphere. Can anyone provide a link to where this
is being studied. If such particles come from quasars or supernovas,
how are they able to retain so much of their energy?
Why would they lose energy? Things generally don't lose energy unless
something else acts to take it away -- e.g. friction.
And if they lose
energy are there any reasonable assumptions as to how much charge they
originally possessed.
I gave an arbitrary figure for the eV. 1TeV would have been excessive.
These particles must come into contact with other celestial
bodies\particles where there will be loses in energy. Google searches
have prove fruitless on this topic.
OK, let me see if I have this right. You don't remember what you read,
so you made up a number rather than looking it up. You don't know
whether eV measures charge or energy. You assume that everything MUST
encounter celestial particles and lose energy in that process. Have you
considered reading something other than the internet?
If you can't answer the question why not ignore my post, simple!
That's why I responded to your post, to clarify your question. When I
found out that you had no idea what you were asking, I pointed that
out.
PD
|
This is actually what I was looking for. There is even a principle
backing what I wrote in my original post. Link
http://www.xs4all.nl/~carlkop/cosray.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PD
science forum Guru
Joined: 03 May 2005
Posts: 4363
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 11:06 pm Post subject:
Re: Particles bombarding earth's atomsphere
|
|
|
muser wrote:
| Quote: | PD wrote:
muser wrote:
PD wrote:
muser wrote:
PD wrote:
muser wrote:
I read recently about the discovery of a particle with a 50eV charge
50 eV is an energy, not a charge, and not much energy to boot.
Might be good to recheck the reading to find out what it really said.
hitting the earth's atomsphere. Can anyone provide a link to where this
is being studied. If such particles come from quasars or supernovas,
how are they able to retain so much of their energy?
Why would they lose energy? Things generally don't lose energy unless
something else acts to take it away -- e.g. friction.
And if they lose
energy are there any reasonable assumptions as to how much charge they
originally possessed.
I gave an arbitrary figure for the eV. 1TeV would have been excessive.
These particles must come into contact with other celestial
bodies\particles where there will be loses in energy. Google searches
have prove fruitless on this topic.
OK, let me see if I have this right. You don't remember what you read,
so you made up a number rather than looking it up. You don't know
whether eV measures charge or energy. You assume that everything MUST
encounter celestial particles and lose energy in that process. Have you
considered reading something other than the internet?
If you can't answer the question why not ignore my post, simple!
That's why I responded to your post, to clarify your question. When I
found out that you had no idea what you were asking, I pointed that
out.
PD
This is actually what I was looking for. There is even a principle
backing what I wrote in my original post. Link
http://www.xs4all.nl/~carlkop/cosray.html
|
OK, so what's your question?
PD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
muser
science forum addict
Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 67
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 8:28 am Post subject:
Re: Particles bombarding earth's atomsphere
|
|
|
PD wrote:
| Quote: | muser wrote:
PD wrote:
muser wrote:
PD wrote:
muser wrote:
PD wrote:
muser wrote:
I read recently about the discovery of a particle with a 50eV charge
50 eV is an energy, not a charge, and not much energy to boot.
Might be good to recheck the reading to find out what it really said.
hitting the earth's atomsphere. Can anyone provide a link to where this
is being studied. If such particles come from quasars or supernovas,
how are they able to retain so much of their energy?
Why would they lose energy? Things generally don't lose energy unless
something else acts to take it away -- e.g. friction.
And if they lose
energy are there any reasonable assumptions as to how much charge they
originally possessed.
I gave an arbitrary figure for the eV. 1TeV would have been excessive.
These particles must come into contact with other celestial
bodies\particles where there will be loses in energy. Google searches
have prove fruitless on this topic.
OK, let me see if I have this right. You don't remember what you read,
so you made up a number rather than looking it up. You don't know
whether eV measures charge or energy. You assume that everything MUST
encounter celestial particles and lose energy in that process. Have you
considered reading something other than the internet?
If you can't answer the question why not ignore my post, simple!
That's why I responded to your post, to clarify your question. When I
found out that you had no idea what you were asking, I pointed that
out.
PD
This is actually what I was looking for. There is even a principle
backing what I wrote in my original post. Link
http://www.xs4all.nl/~carlkop/cosray.html
OK, so what's your question?
PD
|
It has been answered. I shouldn't have confused charge with energy,
replace charge with energy in my original post and there is the
question. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Google
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
The time now is Sun Nov 23, 2008 8:48 pm | All times are GMT
|
|
Credit Card | Credit Card Consolidation | Loans | Fast Loans | Credit Cards
|
|
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
|
|
Other DeniX Solutions sites:
Electronics forum |
Medicine forum |
Unix/Linux blog |
Unix/Linux documentation |
Unix/Linux forums
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Forum index
»
Science and Technology
»
Physics
»
Particle
