FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics
RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 14 [207 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Goto page:  1, 2, 3, ..., 12, 13, 14 Next
Author Message
Phineas T Puddleduck
science forum Guru


Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Posts: 759

PostPosted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 8:06 pm    Post subject: Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH Reply with quote

On 9/7/06 21:05, in article gke2b210ikrrsm27p12j1t2465o90jlo4p@4ax.com,
"George Hammond" <nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote:

Quote:
And the truly amazing thing.... is that the ANCIENT
EGYPTIANS figured all this out and ENGRAVED IT ON THE
PYRAMID WALLS 4,500 years before EINSTEIN was even born!

And the truly amazing thing.... George Hammond is an idiot
--

Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bullshit repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
Corollary -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
³It approaches the asymptote faster, the more Œpseduos¹ you throw in your
formulas.²
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orange jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson
Why parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE
SCIENCE". Pay no attention to my butt poking forward, it is expanding.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+





--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Back to top
T Wake
science forum Guru


Joined: 08 May 2005
Posts: 1978

PostPosted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 8:12 pm    Post subject: Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH Reply with quote

"George Hammond" <nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:gke2b210ikrrsm27p12j1t2465o90jlo4p@4ax.com...
** THIS MESSAGE HAS BEEN RUN THROUGH THE CRANKOLATOR WHICH USES PATENTED
TECHNOLOGY TO REMOVE CRANK / K00K GIBBERISH **
Quote:
gibberish removed

Oh, sorry George. There doesn't seem to be anything left...
Back to top
2
science forum beginner


Joined: 15 Mar 2006
Posts: 33

PostPosted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 8:23 pm    Post subject: Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH Reply with quote

"George Hammond" <nowhere1@notspam.org> wrote in message
news:gke2b210ikrrsm27p12j1t2465o90jlo4p@4ax.com...
Quote:
[...] Egypt [...] lasted a staggering 3,000
years until the Christian Era when it was finally
overwhelmed by the Greco-Roman empires.

Try 10,000 years. But still, that doesn't relate to your argument.

Quote:
The Christians plagiarized the religion from the Jews and

Yeah, yeah. I swear you are evidence of the existence of the bi-cameral
mind.

Quote:
HOWEVER.... it turns out that the discovery of RELATIVITY
has changed all that!

How does a discovery change past history?

Quote:
Now it is realized that "life after death" might actually be
a form of "life before death" that is simply time dilated so
that it APPEARS to take place after death.

I'll buy that.

Quote:
[...[ although to the paramedic rescue team who
found you dead with your head in a toilet from an alcohol
drinking binge would assume that you "died instantly from a
heart attack". To them you died in a few seconds..... but
to you, you lived on for 5 years in paradise after you
died!

Ah, autobiography. Carry on. What else inspires your ideas besides getting
dead drunk?

Quote:
IN FACT..... I think Einstein's MIRACULOUS discovery of the
so called "TWINS PARADOX" is EXACTLY the miracle of Life
After Death! In other words it is relativistic loss of
simultaneity that explains life "after death"..

Let's write a sci-fi story.

Quote:
And the truly amazing thing.... is that the ANCIENT
EGYPTIANS figured all this out and ENGRAVED IT ON THE
PYRAMID WALLS 4,500 years before EINSTEIN was even born!

A stone was found in Ireland around 1840. It had markings that were
suspected to be made by a human hand. Much time was spent trying to fathom
the message until one day the janitor saw window light glancing across its
surface and it read, in plain English, "Again today I am drunk."

Carry on.
Back to top
george Hammond1
science forum beginner


Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 36

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 12:34 am    Post subject: Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH Reply with quote

"jambaugh" <ego@jamesbaugh.info> wrote in message
news:1152476750.092744.153900@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
And the truly amazing thing.... George Hammond is an idiot

I'm sorry that is simply inaccurate. Hammond is relatively intellegent
but he has trapped himself into a world of delusions coupled with a
desperate need to vindicate his beliefs (both with "scientific" proof
and with recognition here. He is profoundly warped but not profoundly
retarded (old school definition of "idiot".)

Please be accurate.

Regards,
James


[Hammond]
I'll tell you what Dr. Baugh.... I'll grant you "right of passage"
not to be insulted by me and furthermore I will overlook your
insulting remarks toward me (e.g. 'Hammond is profoundly warped'),
again, in deference to your personal accomplishments, obvious
sacrifice and personal dedication in achieving a PhD in theoretical
physics from the Theoretical Physics Group at GA Tech under
the world renouned Prof. David Finkelstein
see: http://www.physics.gatech.edu/qr/jamesb.htm

I will remark that you obviously are the most intelligent
and accomplished scientist who has ever said anything about
this theory, even granting the fact that you are only 27 years
old and still a (post doc) student. The only possible exception
being (Prof.) Chris Isham, who unfortunately made the same
presumptious mistake you have made, in that while you
are (obviously) both brilliant world class mathematical
physicists, neither one of you has an ounce of the "Feynman
practical touch" when it comes to intuitive practical scientific
problems.
In the end however I have come to regret the impolite
(indeed exceedingly crude) remarks that I made to Chris Isham
after he perfunctly dismissed my theory as (apparently)
incompetent.... when in fact it was he who incompetently
rejected the idea of a scientific proof of God out of hand.

At any rate, I have decided not to repeat the mistake of
insulting one of my superiors in the field of Physics, and
to more or less adopt the "Micheal Faraday approach"
when talking to first rank scientific personnel, such as
you or Prof. Isham, in the future. I realize now the
need to "politely pre-suggest" when talking to first rank
theoreticians.... as did Michael Faraday when talking to
James Clerk Maxwell.

Anyway, I do appreciate at least a backhanded compliment
in that you have said "Hammond is profoundly warped but
not profoundly retarded" when you know quite well that
in fact Hammond is (compared to someone like you or
C. Isham) "profoundly retarded but not profoundly
warped".... at least you have a charitable sense of humor.
I am grateful for that!
--
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
========================================
Back to top
riplin@Azonic.co.nz
science forum beginner


Joined: 09 Oct 2005
Posts: 43

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 1:02 am    Post subject: Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH Reply with quote

George Hammond wrote:

Quote:
The Egyptian religion was the first,

It was not the first religion.

Quote:
most sophist-icated, most technically advanced religion the world has
ever seen.

Egypt was the most sophisticated and technically advanced people
_at_the_time_. The Romans were more technically advanced. Religion is
never 'technical'.

Quote:
It wasthe high water mark of world religion, Israel notwithstanding.

I think that you know nothing of _world_ religions.

Quote:
This because Egypt was the first
empire the world ever saw. It lasted a staggering 3,000
years until the Christian Era when it was finally
overwhelmed by the Greco-Roman empires.

It did _NOT_ last until 'Christian Era', Alexander, for example was 332
BCE, you do understand that the B stands for Before don't you ?

Quote:
Recall Moses himself was born in Egypt where he copied it
into the Old Testament and renamed the Egyptian Sun God the
God of Israel, Yahweh.

You are confused. Are you claiming that 'Yehweh' was what the
Egyptians called their Sun god or that Moses changed the name of the
'God of Israel' to be 'Ra' ?

Quote:
The Christians plagiarized the religion from the Jews and
published it in the New Testament where the Sun God became
the Son of God and it can be seen today complete with the
original Egyptian theory of Life After Death now bellowing
forth from the mouth of St. Paul in I Cor 15:35-58.

So you are now saying that it is Jesus who is the sun-god/son-god and
not Yehweh at all.

Quote:
All of which brings us to the present modern scientific
thesis which is:

RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH

You do make these huge leaps with no logic or evidential basis.

Quote:
As I have just stated, the Egyptian theory of Life After
Death is IDENTICAL to the Christian theory and this is no
surprise since the Christians simply copied the Egyptian
theory which was forwarded to them by the Jews who had lived
in Egypt for 400 years with Moses.

Actually that is quite untrue. The Egyptians believed that life after
death was only available to kings and high born and required
mumification and other special features such as pyramids.

Also the Jews did not live 'with Moses' for 400 years. He wasn't that
old.

Quote:
For this reason the theory of a "death dream Afterlife" has
never been taken very seriously by scientific people.

Eaxctly. If a 'soul' can see without benefit of eyes then how come
people go blind when they lose their eyes.

Quote:
Now it is realized that "life after death" might actually be
a form of "life before death" that is simply time dilated so
that it APPEARS to take place after death.

So it is only 'apparent' and not real at all. Well there yer go. It
ain't real.

Quote:
For instance. Suppose the script of this "death dream" had
been slowly and methodically written in advance throughout
your entire life, minute by minute and recorded in your
brain. And then suppose

At least you recognise that this is all a 'suppose'.

Quote:
at the last instant of life it were
to "dump" or "read out" almost instantaneously at near
optical frequencies.

What is 'optical frequency' ?

Quote:
Suppose in a few microseconds this
long prepared "life after death" dream (or life) was read
out and then "TIME DILATED" so that the few microseconds was
expanded to, say, 5 years...!

Your previous claims were that due to 'brain deficit' the brain could
not process stuff fast enough to see everything anyway, and 20% was
invisible due to being 'too fast'. Now you claim that the brain could
process 5 years information in a few microseconds.

At least one of those claims is wrong, they both cannot be true.

Actually both are untrue.
Back to top
jchristow@hotmail.com
science forum beginner


Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 2:59 am    Post subject: Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH Reply with quote

The most amazing thing for me was the meaning of life and confirmation
of a five year after-life was staring at me, the whole time, from my
pack of Camels!

George do you think Phillip Morris knows this and wants to expedite our
journey to this paradise?

riplin@Azonic.co.nz wrote:
Quote:
George Hammond wrote:

The Egyptian religion was the first,

It was not the first religion.

most sophist-icated, most technically advanced religion the world has
ever seen.

Egypt was the most sophisticated and technically advanced people
_at_the_time_. The Romans were more technically advanced. Religion is
never 'technical'.

It wasthe high water mark of world religion, Israel notwithstanding.

I think that you know nothing of _world_ religions.

This because Egypt was the first
empire the world ever saw. It lasted a staggering 3,000
years until the Christian Era when it was finally
overwhelmed by the Greco-Roman empires.

It did _NOT_ last until 'Christian Era', Alexander, for example was 332
BCE, you do understand that the B stands for Before don't you ?

Recall Moses himself was born in Egypt where he copied it
into the Old Testament and renamed the Egyptian Sun God the
God of Israel, Yahweh.

You are confused. Are you claiming that 'Yehweh' was what the
Egyptians called their Sun god or that Moses changed the name of the
'God of Israel' to be 'Ra' ?

The Christians plagiarized the religion from the Jews and
published it in the New Testament where the Sun God became
the Son of God and it can be seen today complete with the
original Egyptian theory of Life After Death now bellowing
forth from the mouth of St. Paul in I Cor 15:35-58.

So you are now saying that it is Jesus who is the sun-god/son-god and
not Yehweh at all.

All of which brings us to the present modern scientific
thesis which is:

RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH

You do make these huge leaps with no logic or evidential basis.

As I have just stated, the Egyptian theory of Life After
Death is IDENTICAL to the Christian theory and this is no
surprise since the Christians simply copied the Egyptian
theory which was forwarded to them by the Jews who had lived
in Egypt for 400 years with Moses.

Actually that is quite untrue. The Egyptians believed that life after
death was only available to kings and high born and required
mumification and other special features such as pyramids.

Also the Jews did not live 'with Moses' for 400 years. He wasn't that
old.

For this reason the theory of a "death dream Afterlife" has
never been taken very seriously by scientific people.

Eaxctly. If a 'soul' can see without benefit of eyes then how come
people go blind when they lose their eyes.

Now it is realized that "life after death" might actually be
a form of "life before death" that is simply time dilated so
that it APPEARS to take place after death.

So it is only 'apparent' and not real at all. Well there yer go. It
ain't real.

For instance. Suppose the script of this "death dream" had
been slowly and methodically written in advance throughout
your entire life, minute by minute and recorded in your
brain. And then suppose

At least you recognise that this is all a 'suppose'.

at the last instant of life it were
to "dump" or "read out" almost instantaneously at near
optical frequencies.

What is 'optical frequency' ?

Suppose in a few microseconds this
long prepared "life after death" dream (or life) was read
out and then "TIME DILATED" so that the few microseconds was
expanded to, say, 5 years...!

Your previous claims were that due to 'brain deficit' the brain could
not process stuff fast enough to see everything anyway, and 20% was
invisible due to being 'too fast'. Now you claim that the brain could
process 5 years information in a few microseconds.

At least one of those claims is wrong, they both cannot be true.

Actually both are untrue.
Back to top
george Hammond1
science forum beginner


Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 36

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 4:21 am    Post subject: Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH Reply with quote

<jchristow@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1152500387.962484.129590@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
The most amazing thing for me was the meaning of life and confirmation
of a five year after-life was staring at me, the whole time, from my
pack of Camels!

[Hammond]

I've been thinking the same thing.

Quote:
George do you think Phillip Morris knows this and wants to expedite our
journey to this paradise?

riplin@Azonic.co.nz wrote:
George Hammond wrote:

The Egyptian religion was the first,

It was not the first religion.

[Hammond]

Oh sure, and Leif Ericson discovered America not Columbus.

Quote:
most sophist-icated, most technically advanced religion the world has
ever seen.


Religion is
never 'technical'.

[Hammond]

13 Animal-Headed gods is a "technical religious fact".
The Ankh, the Egyptian Cross and heiroglyph
for "Life" is a "technical religious fact".
Euphemistically symbolizing God as the Sun,
is a "technical religous fact".
Explaining life after death in (structural psychological)
terms of the Ba, Ka and Akh is a
"technical religous fact".
Portraying the human soul as a bird with a human
head is a "technical religious fact".
Symbolizing the resurrected spititual body as
a Phoneix bird is a "technical religious fact".
Incense is a "technical religious fact".
Prayer is a "technical religious fact"
the list goes on

Quote:
It wasthe high water mark of world religion, Israel notwithstanding.

I think that you know nothing of _world_ religions.


[Hammond]
That's because you have your head up your ass
Nazi stooge.



Quote:
This because Egypt was the first
empire the world ever saw. It lasted a staggering 3,000
years until the Christian Era when it was finally
overwhelmed by the Greco-Roman empires.

It did _NOT_ last until 'Christian Era', Alexander, for example was 332
BCE, you do understand that the B stands for Before don't you ?


[Hammond]
I understand the world looks entirely brown
if you have your head up your ass.



Quote:
Recall Moses himself was born in Egypt where he copied it
into the Old Testament and renamed the Egyptian Sun God the
God of Israel, Yahweh.

You are confused. Are you claiming that 'Yehweh' was what the
Egyptians called their Sun god or that Moses changed the name of the
'God of Israel' to be 'Ra' ?


[Hammond]
Neither stooge.... I'm saying that the Pharoah, the Egyptian
priests and Moses were all enlightned enough to know
there was one God, and what it was....brain growth as
visible evidenced by a person's awareness, which is a
fuckin-A whole lot more than you know.


Quote:
The Christians plagiarized the religion from the Jews and
published it in the New Testament where the Sun God became
the Son of God and it can be seen today complete with the
original Egyptian theory of Life After Death now bellowing
forth from the mouth of St. Paul in I Cor 15:35-58.

So you are now saying that it is Jesus who is the sun-god/son-god and
not Yehweh at all.


[Hammond]
answered above.

Quote:
All of which brings us to the present modern scientific
thesis which is:

RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH

You do make these huge leaps with no logic or evidential basis.


[Hammond]
there aren't any leaps... those are simply
gaping lacunae in your education and/or
logical ability.




Quote:
As I have just stated, the Egyptian theory of Life After
Death is IDENTICAL to the Christian theory and this is no
surprise since the Christians simply copied the Egyptian
theory which was forwarded to them by the Jews who had lived
in Egypt for 400 years with Moses.

Actually that is quite untrue. The Egyptians believed that life after
death was only available to kings and high born and required
mumification and other special features such as pyramids.


[Hammond]
Horse s**t.... in those days only the upper class had to
WORRY about it because they were responsible for
the masses who couldn't even read... hence the elite were
the only ones who could be punished by God... since they
were the only ones who knew about it.

Quote:
Also the Jews did not live 'with Moses' for 400 years. He wasn't that
old.


[Hammond]
whaddaru a comedian too a*****le?

Quote:
For this reason the theory of a "death dream Afterlife" has
never been taken very seriously by scientific people.

Eaxctly. If a 'soul' can see without benefit of eyes then how come
people go blind when they lose their eyes.


[Hammond]
There are blind people in heaven dude... being in a condition of
"eternal life" is sort of like having a continous never ending
orgasm.... it isn't dependent on sight.


Quote:
Now it is realized that "life after death" might actually be
a form of "life before death" that is simply time dilated so
that it APPEARS to take place after death.

So it is only 'apparent' and not real at all. Well there yer go. It
ain't real.


[Hammond]
There is no definitIon of "real" or of "reality" that does not involve
the opinion of a human being. Go ahead, try to
make an operational definition of "real" that does not involve
the opinion of a human being..... there IS NO SUCH DEFINITON.
Proof: If all men died tomorrow at 9 am, how could it be proved that
the Universe still existed at 9:01 am..... answer: It couldn't, therefore
in fact the Universe WOULDN'T EXIST at 9:01 am!!




Quote:
For instance. Suppose the script of this "death dream" had
been slowly and methodically written in advance throughout
your entire life, minute by minute and recorded in your
brain. And then suppose

At least you recognise that this is all a 'suppose'.


[Hammond]
Yes, but all of the "supposes" are scientifically possible, in fact,
they are even scientifically PROBABLE, given the fact of the
discovery of the SPOG by Hammond.



Quote:
at the last instant of life it were
to "dump" or "read out" almost instantaneously at near
optical frequencies.

What is 'optical frequency' ?


[Hammond]
10^15 Hz.... in fact Frohlich's frequency which is in the
microwave band 10^12 is already well known in the brain
.... in fact optical signals have been recognized in the
interior of the microtubule skeletons in nerve cells.
This is 12 orders of magnitude above say neuronal
firing rate (thinking/brainwave frequency) making possible
a factor of 10^12 time dilation possible... which would
expand a millisecond into 5 years.
St Paul says in I Corintians ch 15 that we will be
changed "at the last trump, in the twinkling of an eye"
and we will be raised in a "spiritual body". According to
the above calculation the death dream could read out
in a millisecond (from all brain cells at simultaneously),
and thus would contain all necessary information
for a 5 year existence in a spiritual world of Life After
Death, no problem!



Quote:
Suppose in a few microseconds this
long prepared "life after death" dream (or life) was read
out and then "TIME DILATED" so that the few microseconds was
expanded to, say, 5 years...!

Your previous claims were that due to 'brain deficit' the brain could
not process stuff fast enough to see everything anyway, and 20% was
invisible due to being 'too fast'. Now you claim that the brain could
process 5 years information in a few microseconds.


[Hammond]
Yeah... but not in the real world body.... the real world body
can only fire neurons at 1 kc, this read out is at the
atomic/molecular structural level in the microtubules and
is a quantum mechanical phenomenon. It is not the
real world bodily consciousness that is vewing this
movie... is is a quantum mechanical consciousness
that is viewing it... the so called "spiritual body".



Quote:
At least one of those claims is wrong, they both cannot be true.

Actually both are untrue.


[Hammond]
Actually you're full of s**t too.
--
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
========================================
Back to top
Jeff…Relf
science forum Guru Wannabe


Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 114

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 8:43 am    Post subject: Killing Death. Reply with quote

Hi George_Hammond, Good read, much better than your normal fare, I must say.
Looking at 1 Corinthians 15 ( KJV ), I see:

For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.
The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.
.....
why stand we in jeopardy every hour ? ... if the dead rise not ?
let us eat and drink; for tomorrow we die.

Then, you say, from the Book_of_the_Dead:

But some man will say, How are the dead raised up ?
and with what body do they come ?
Thou fool, that which thou sowest is not quickened, except it die
.....
Behold, I shew you a mystery;
We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed.....

This idea that the dead are merely sleeping, I realize you love it, but...

Isn't that something you'd tell your 4 year old to appease him ?
Isn't it rather retro ? unsophisticated.
All any ever did was burn bright, like a star, dissipating into the night.

As for time dilation...

The SI meter/second are both counts of oscillations of a certain cesium maser.
The SI kilogram could be measured the same way, in theory,
because there's also radiation pressure, not just a period and a wavelength.
At an _Ideal_ event horizon
( true event horizons/vacuums can't form, not enough energy to create them )
its SI second takes an eternity, so no time passes.
Likewise, its SI meter is infinitely wide, so no volume exists.
Finally, its SI kilogram is infinitely weak
( i.e. its SI radiation pressure is fully dissipated )
so infinite Relativistic_Mass exists.
So it's static and infinitely dense... both to us _And_ at the horizon.
The visible universe is on course to dissipate before it could fully form.
Similarly, our universe was once static and infinitely dense,
only the topology has always been flat ( euclidian ) in 4 dimensions,
it's only hyperbolic when you look at the fifth _Spatial_ dimension:

The length of the geodesic that goes from the earth
to the _Visible_ birth of the CMB.
Given dark energy has negative pressure, e = m * c^2,
Omega_Total always equals 1, Omega_Lambda always equals .74,
and w always equals -1 ( all in agreement with Lambda_CDM, I assume ),
we have:

Pressure_Cosmos always equals: - ( .74 / .26 ) * Density_Matter * c^2
( the positive pressure of radiation is insignificant ).
www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/W.PNG

Although this 5th dimension is spatial, demarcated in SI meters;
by conversions it can also be demarcated in pressure, heat, entropy and time.
The Units of entropy are Joules per Kelvin, but only the Kelvin changes;
so the entropy goes up as the temperature of the universe drops.
Think of entropy as a measure of how dissipated ( consumed ) something is.

Now... What does any of this have to do with Dreams/Eternal_Life ?

Just as a dice toss is known to be pseudorandom ( i.e. causal )
even when no one knows the outcome,
Einstein asserted that all randomness must be pseudorandom
so that time is pseudo-directional.
WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Block_Time
Philsci-Archive.Pitt.EDU/archive/00002408/
Scientific American, Sep 2002:
Urgrue.ORG/lib/mysterious-flow.html
Plato.Stanford.EDU/entries/time/#8

Einstein wrote:

But the scientist is possessed by the sense of universal causation.
The future, to him, is every whit as necessary and determined as the past.
EinsteinAndReligion.COM/sciencereligious.html

and:

People like us, who believe in physics,
know that the distinction between past, present, and future
is only a stubbornly persistent illusion.
SpeakingOfFaith.PublicRadio.ORG/programs/einsteinsgod/unheardcuts.shtml

Consequently, he felt physical processes determined absolutely everything,
including man's desires, see: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Physicalism .
Einstein said:

I do not believe in freedom of the will. Schopenhauer's words:

“ Man can do what he wants, but he cannot will what he wills ”

accompany me in all situations throughout my life and reconcile me with
the actions of others even if they are rather painful to me.

This awareness of the lack of freedom of will preserves me from
taking too seriously myself and my fellow men as
acting and deciding individuals and from losing my temper.
EinsteinAndReligion.COM/credo.html

As for what the word God means:

Like you're God to the mice you raise to feed your snake,
...you're God's prisoner and God to your prisoners.
Entropy is the top God because, like a lit match,
consumption ( hence dissipation and entropy ) creates/destroys everything.
Back to top
yt56erd
science forum Guru


Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 313

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 9:23 am    Post subject: Re: Killing Death. Reply with quote

Jeff...Relf wrote:
Quote:
Hi George_Hammond, Good read, much better than your normal fare, I must say.
Looking at 1 Corinthians 15 ( KJV ), I see:


shut the f*** up you retard. you make hammond look sane.
Back to top
Jeff…Relf
science forum Guru Wannabe


Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 114

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 10:41 am    Post subject: Sanity check. Reply with quote

Hi Cranks_Reply, You told me:

shut the f*** up you retard. you make hammond look sane.

Oh yea ? eat this:

#pragma warning( disable: 4127 4189 4244 4305 4430 4508 4554 4701 4702 4706 \
4996 )
#undef _DEBUG
#define UNICODE
#define _WIN32_WINNT 0x0501
#define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN
#include <Winsock2.H>
#pragma comment( lib, "Ws2_32.LIB")
#include <Windows.H>
#include <StdIO.H>
#include <IO.H>
#include <StdLib.H>
#include <Math.H>
#include <Time.H>
#include "C:\\Program Files\\Microsoft DirectX SDK (December 2005)\\Include\\DDraw.H"
#pragma comment( lib, "C:\\Program Files\\Microsoft DirectX SDK (December 2005)\\Lib\\x86\\DDraw.LIB")
#pragma comment( lib, "C:\\Program Files\\Microsoft DirectX SDK (December 2005)\\Lib\\x86\\DXguid.LIB")
#include <Ras.H>
#include <RasError.H>
#pragma comment( lib, "RasAPI32.LIB")
#include <MLang.H>

#define LOOP while ( 1 )
#define Loop( N ) int J = - 1, LLL = N ; while ( ++ J < LLL )
#define LoopTo( StopCond ) \
while ( \
Ch && ( Ch = * ++ P ) \
&& ! ( Ch2 = P [ 1 ], StopCond ) )
#define GoTo_White LoopTo ( Ch <= 32 );
#define GoTo_Black LoopTo ( Ch > 32 );
Back to top
Jeff…Relf
science forum Guru Wannabe


Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 114

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 11:27 am    Post subject: Show me anything slightly complicated that you wrote. Reply with quote

Hi Cranks_Reply, Re: Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/X.CPP
You told me:

yeah, if it was a sanity check you fucking failed.
s**t code by the way nutbag.

Ok, show me what _Real_ code looks like... something you wrote.
In fact, show me anything slightly complicated that you wrote.
Back to top
Phineas T Puddleduck
science forum Guru


Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Posts: 759

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 1:05 pm    Post subject: Re: Killing Death. Reply with quote

On 10/7/06 09:43, in article Jeff_Relf_2006_Jul_10_GDN2@Cotse.NET,
"JeffŠRelf" <Jeff_Relf@Yahoo.COM> wrote:

Quote:
As for time dilation...

The SI meter/second are both counts of oscillations of a certain cesium maser.
The SI kilogram could be measured the same way, in theory,

Drop the poor science, kook

--

Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bullshit repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
Corollary -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
³It approaches the asymptote faster, the more Œpseduos¹ you throw in
your formulas.²
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
³Gravity is one of the four fundamental interactions. The classical
theory of gravity - Einstein's general relativity - is the subject
of this book.² : Hartle/ Gravity pg 1
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orange jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson
why parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Back to top
Phineas T Puddleduck
science forum Guru


Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Posts: 759

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 1:06 pm    Post subject: Re: Sanity check. Reply with quote

On 10/7/06 11:41, in article Jeff_Relf_2006_Jul_10_I4z4@Cotse.NET,
"JeffŠRelf" <Jeff_Relf@Yahoo.COM> wrote:

Quote:
Hi Cranks_Reply, You told me:

shut the f*** up you retard. you make hammond look sane.

Oh yea ? eat this:

#pragma warning( disable: 4127 4189 4244 4305 4430 4508 4554 4701 4702 4706
\
4996 )

The fact you posted C code here is further proof of your insanity

--

Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bullshit repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
Corollary -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
³It approaches the asymptote faster, the more Œpseduos¹ you throw in
your formulas.²
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
³Gravity is one of the four fundamental interactions. The classical
theory of gravity - Einstein's general relativity - is the subject
of this book.² : Hartle/ Gravity pg 1
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orange jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson
why parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Back to top
yt56erd
science forum Guru


Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 313

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 2:22 pm    Post subject: Re: Show me anything slightly complicated that you wrote. Reply with quote

Jeff...Relf wrote:
Quote:
Hi Cranks_Reply, Re: Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/X.CPP
You told me:

yeah, if it was a sanity check you fucking failed.
s**t code by the way nutbag.

Ok, show me what _Real_ code looks like... something you wrote.
In fact, show me anything slightly complicated that you wrote.

what the f*** does your drivel have to do with showing sanity. you are
stupid retarded cunt. posting your c++ drivel does not for one fricking
second imply you have any skills at physics at fucking all.

you are a pathetic toad
Back to top
Phineas T Puddleduck
science forum Guru


Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Posts: 759

PostPosted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 4:06 pm    Post subject: Re: Here's some physics, please point out my errors. Reply with quote

On 10/7/06 17:01, in article Jeff_Relf_2006_Jul_10_KSuh@Cotse.NET,
"JeffŠRelf" <Jeff_Relf@Yahoo.COM> wrote:

Quote:
So you have nothing to show... I thought so.
Here's some physics, please point out my errors:

Its easier to point out what you have right, and so I have between the quote
marks

""

There you go,

--

Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bullshit repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
Corollary -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
³It approaches the asymptote faster, the more Œpseduos¹ you throw in
your formulas.²
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
³Gravity is one of the four fundamental interactions. The classical
theory of gravity - Einstein's general relativity - is the subject
of this book.² : Hartle/ Gravity pg 1
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orange jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson
why parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 14 [207 Posts] Goto page:  1, 2, 3, ..., 12, 13, 14 Next
View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Tue Oct 17, 2017 5:59 am | All times are GMT
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts Question about Life. socratus Probability 0 Sun Jan 06, 2008 10:01 pm
No new posts "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Obs... Tde Physics 0 Thu Jul 20, 2006 5:11 pm
No new posts "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Obs... Tde New Theories 0 Thu Jul 20, 2006 5:11 pm
No new posts "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Obs... Tde Particle 0 Thu Jul 20, 2006 5:11 pm
No new posts "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Obs... Tde Relativity 0 Thu Jul 20, 2006 5:11 pm

Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Electronics forum |  Medicine forum |  Unix/Linux blog |  Unix/Linux documentation |  Unix/Linux forums  |  send newsletters
 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.0477s ][ Queries: 16 (0.0047s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]