Search   Memberlist   Usergroups
 Page 1 of 1 [2 Posts]
Author Message
Bossavit
science forum beginner

Joined: 17 Jul 2005
Posts: 10

Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 11:41 am    Post subject: Re: Intrinsic definitions of pseudovectors/&c.

Lavelle:
 Quote: Just a question: tangent vectors/cotangent vectors can be defined intrinsically as equivalence classes (...) is there any similarly pleasant geometrical definition of [pseudovectors/spinors/etc.]

You might find useful to refer to Burke's
"Applied Differential Geometry" (one among many
other sources): a pseudovector, or as Burke
says, a "twisted vector", in dimension n,
is indeed an equivalence class, made of two
equivalent pairs {v, Or} of type VECTOR x n-COVECTOR,
with Or (the n-covector) non null. The equivalence relation is {v,
Or} equiv. {-v, Or'} iff Or and
Or' have opposite signs (n-covectors make a
1-dimensional space, so this makes sense).

The geometrical picture is quite clear: a
pseudovector is a vector bearing, piggyback, an
orientation (a local one) of ambient space.
The opposite vector, burdened with the
opposite orientation, is another representative
of the same pseudovector (aka axial vector, or
twisted vector). As Burke shows convincingly,
vectors can also be identified with equivalence
classes of pairs, of type
{twisted vector, (orienting) n-covector},
so there is a nice symmetry between "straight"
objects, such as vectors, and twisted ones.

To the extent that tensors can be defined
intrinsically (as, for instance, multilinear
maps), this applies to them as well.

I have a litle more on that in
http://www.icm.edu.pl/edukacja/mat/axial.php
analytic
science forum beginner

Joined: 14 May 2005
Posts: 18

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 4:46 pm    Post subject: Intrinsic definitions of pseudovectors/&c.

Hey,

Just a question: tangent vectors/cotangent vectors can be defined
either intrinsically as equivalence classess of differentiable
paths/scalar fields, or as quantities that reside in the charts with
various transformation rules; I only know pseudovectors/spinors/etc.
through transformation rules; is there any similarly pleasant
geometrical definition of these quantities?

 Display posts from previous: All Posts1 Day7 Days2 Weeks1 Month3 Months6 Months1 Year Oldest FirstNewest First
 Page 1 of 1 [2 Posts]
 The time now is Sat Nov 17, 2018 7:13 pm | All times are GMT
 Jump to: Select a forum-------------------Forum index|___Science and Technology    |___Math    |   |___Research    |   |___num-analysis    |   |___Symbolic    |   |___Combinatorics    |   |___Probability    |   |   |___Prediction    |   |       |   |___Undergraduate    |   |___Recreational    |       |___Physics    |   |___Research    |   |___New Theories    |   |___Acoustics    |   |___Electromagnetics    |   |___Strings    |   |___Particle    |   |___Fusion    |   |___Relativity    |       |___Chem    |   |___Analytical    |   |___Electrochem    |   |   |___Battery    |   |       |   |___Coatings    |       |___Engineering        |___Control        |___Mechanics        |___Chemical

 Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post Similar Topics Source for intrinsic safety cable rblake.gg@gmail.com Control 2 Fri Jun 09, 2006 2:05 pm explicit, solvable, analytical definitions? Fritz Math 3 Tue May 30, 2006 1:34 pm inertial=restful=intrinsic. brian a m stuckless Electromagnetics 0 Wed May 03, 2006 8:47 pm inertial=restful=intrinsic. brian a m stuckless Math 0 Wed May 03, 2006 8:47 pm Plane Wave Reflection and Refraction in tern of wave equa... Monty Hall Electromagnetics 1 Wed Apr 19, 2006 7:13 pm