|
|
| Author |
Message |
pedro science forum beginner
Joined: 13 Jul 2006
Posts: 1
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 4:46 pm Post subject:
perforated sheet
|
|
|
As a university work assignment I'm making a preliminary design of an
anechoic chamber.
I receive a suggestion from a technician to install the anechoic
materials (foam wedges) in a rigid perforated metal sheet backed by a
porous material such as mineral wool.
As I understand, the absorption performance of the perforate will
depend only on the geometry (the hole radius and number of holes) and
not on the material.
Why use more expensive sheet metal perforated instead of hardboard or
plywood?
Thanks for help. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tony science forum Guru Wannabe
Joined: 07 Sep 2005
Posts: 111
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:12 pm Post subject:
Re: perforated sheet
|
|
|
"pedro" <ferreiro_pedro@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1152809207.859857.300160@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: | As a university work assignment I'm making a preliminary design of an
anechoic chamber.
I receive a suggestion from a technician to install the anechoic
materials (foam wedges) in a rigid perforated metal sheet backed by a
porous material such as mineral wool.
As I understand, the absorption performance of the perforate will
depend only on the geometry (the hole radius and number of holes) and
not on the material.
Why use more expensive sheet metal perforated instead of hardboard or
plywood?
|
Not quite sure how you intend to mount the wedges, but in answer to your
question, the acoustic performance of perforated sheet depends also on sheet
thickness. The high frequency absorption decreases as sheet thickness
increases, particularly with small holes.
--
Tony W
My e-mail address has no hyphen
- but please don't use it, reply to the group. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Whealy science forum addict
Joined: 05 May 2005
Posts: 54
|
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 7:19 am Post subject:
Re: perforated sheet
|
|
|
pedro wrote:
| Quote: | As a university work assignment I'm making a preliminary design of an anechoic chamber.
I receive a suggestion from a technician to install the anechoic materials (foam wedges) in a rigid perforated metal sheet backed by a porous material such as mineral wool.
As I understand, the absorption performance of the perforate will depend only on the geometry (the hole radius and number of holes) and not on the material.
Why use more expensive sheet metal perforated instead of hardboard or plywood?
|
The theories that predict the impedance and resonant frequency of a
perforated sheet assume that the sheet itself is perfectly rigid and
therefore has no influence on acoustic behaviour. If you used a metal
sheet, then it would be far more rigid than a plywood or hardboard
sheet, and therefore, the performance would be closer to the predicted
values.
The factors affecting the impedance of a perforated sheet are the hole
radius, the repeat distance between holes and the panel thickness.
As either the panel thickness, or the hole spacing increases, the high
end absorption drops off. The high end absorption drops also off as the
hole radius decreases.
Have a look at my Porous Absorber Calculator spreadsheet that might help
you in this area. http://www.whealy.com/acoustics/Porous.html
Chris W
--
The voice of ignorance speaks loud and long,
But the words of the wise are quiet and few.
--- |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
The time now is Sun Nov 23, 2008 7:39 pm | All times are GMT
|
|
Unsecured Loans | Birthday Gifts | Web directory | Mortgages | Free Advertising
|
|
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
|
|
Other DeniX Solutions sites:
Electronics forum |
Medicine forum |
Unix/Linux blog |
Unix/Linux documentation |
Unix/Linux forums
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|