FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics » New Theories
Google affair
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 2 [29 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Goto page:  1, 2 Next
Author Message
gb7648
science forum Guru


Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 606

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:48 pm    Post subject: Re: Google affair Reply with quote

Quote:
Two public domains in question here: usenet and book libraries.

Anything wrong with the idea of going to public libraries, copying
books
and profiting from those copies? Something tells us that that is
illegal.
Libraries are not offering materials for profit, but for reading.
So anyway, Google is breaking a long tradition, that all things
for free out there are opportunities for billions to make.


Infringing on public domains which do not belong to Google
are piracies and illegitimate business.


As with book libraries Google infringed on the non-commerical
public domain of usenet and profits on the 'content' of general
communication, and in libraries on the books served for free,
but Google took the book materials for their commercial needs.
Not allowed, in both cases Google shouldn't infringe unilaterally
on public domains as such act is piracy and illegitimate business.


1. Not only Google infringes on freely served public domains,
they infringe on the public domains unilaterally (take it all,
archive, document it all, no questions asked, Google believes
its free so it can be acquired.

2. Infringing on the content of public domain materials is piracy
as those domains do not belong and cannot belong to Google
unilaterally. Since they cannot belong to Google but to the
public, Google infringed on these domains unilaterally.


3. The contents of general communication are sensitive to
privacy concerns but Google ignored these concerns at large.


4. Google builds profiles on usenet users, personal profiles
on people online, and some people who turn to usenet
from their homes may not even have a webpage of their own,
but Google freerly builds profiles on people's lives online
based on the content of their communication in usenet.
With this act Google runs people's lives online facelessly
through a massive violation of privacy rights (Google runs'
many people's lives and bussinesses in illegitimate
forms, and I am here to ask to stop their infringment
on public domains as its illegal and causes bizarre
and illegal privacy violations from the source of having
these domains pirated in the first place. Google's Groups
Beta and their Library Project are built on illegal piracies
and this class action suit focuses on the source
of these piracies as illegitimate and violating business
culture.


5.




5. Google is in the process of scanning 15 million books
from the greatest Library sources from Prestigious
Universities such as from the libraries of Yale, Stanford, etc.
While Google received a permit these prestigious
libraries, these libraries do not represent the need to
understand the laws behind these acquisitions. Google
shouldn't and can't infringe on book library materials
for their commercial interests. Why these prestigious
universities allowed access to millions of books from
their libraries for Google's financial profiting on these
books is a mystery.

6. Google shouldn't and can't infringe on the content
of general communication materials found in usenet
online for their commercial interest as profiting on
the content of general communication on domains
not owned by Google is piracy on the materials
found on the non-commercial based communication
content of usenet.


91. ...


Conclusion: Google cannot legitimately acquire the contents
of free materials found on public domains for building
commercial business systems around the contents of
those materials which do not belong to Google in the
first place. Such infringments are mass piracies
as they take place in a take it all form unilaterally for
Google's profit interests as such infringments represent
piracy on publically shared non-commercial properties,
and piracy is illegitimate business practice. No other
large telecommuniction company can allow themselves
to profit on the contents of general communication.
They and all companies providing access to communication
online can only profit legitimately by providing communication
tools, but not by profiting from the content of general
communiciation contents, as Google does by profiting
on the instant and permanent documentation of the
content of prior communications made under usenet.


Google went for the source and pirated these materials
highly arrogantly and deliberately ignorantly toward
privacy concerns in regards to infringing unilaterally
on the communication documents found in public domains
for Google's financial interets. Piracy is illegitimate business
practice, and as illegitimate and intruding business
all people using the Internet and access its public communication
services from their homes need to protect themselves
from illegitimate forms of businesses infringing on their
private lives.


Due to these products from Google are being based on
mass infringments by their core sources of pirating business
mentality, I am asking for the banning of Google's Groups
Beta and Library Project for not having established legitimate
business grounds for profiting on domains whicch do not
belong to Google and contain materials which are not
for commercial sale such as general communication online
or books in libraries. Google runs illegal business with these
two products.



- Class action on suing Google for illegitimate and criminal
piracies. -



Correction: Products which are *based on* illegimate and criminal
piracy grounds.


...*based on* illegitimate and illegal piracy grounds.

don't let yourselves being taken advantage of misters, online,
by unilteral piracies.


1. Correct from

1. Not only Google infringes on freely served public domains,
they infringe on the public domains unilaterally (take it all,
archive, document it all, no questions asked, Google believes
its free so it can be acquired.


to


1. Not only Google infringes on materials that are accessible
on freely served public domains for their commercial benefit,
Google infringes on the public domains in a unilateral (take
it all, archive, document it all, no questions asked. Google
believes its free, so it can be acquired and profited on with
or without consideration if such (unilateral) acquisition involves the
illegitimacy of piracy.



1. Not only Google infringes on materials that are accessible
on freely served public domains for their commercial benefit,
Google infringes on the public domains in a unilateral (take
it all, archive, document it all, no questions asked) form, Google
believes its free, so it can be acquired and profited on with
or without consideration if such (unilateral) acquisition involves
illegitimacy of (mass) piracy.


If I am so much more right in the first place, its stupid that I
have to be so perfect in the explanations. The world's stupidest
religious fanatic pirates. But they win because the judge
smiles toward them, and not toward me in court.


90 percent of jobs are not gained based on knowledge, but
based on smiles, the same in US courts (which should be
illegal, but I am not suing the US court system. the secret
of the american smile).


It is the destinee of the Hangayrians to kick out Gooogle and
leave this haunted house where there are people taalking.



Final argument:

What does Google's infringment on general communication 'content' on
public domains mean? Google commercially documents general
communication made
from people's homes, and does it with material they accessed from
public
(non-Google-owned) domains. It means infringing on general public
materials
and profiting from their content is infringment (or piracy) on
people's lives.
[Google treats people as if what they say from home is a matter of
urgency
and needs sponsoring globally. But that's just really annoying and a
downgrading sideeffect of a product which is based on an illegitimate



piracy.] Can you sell general communication content? In Ceausescu's
Romania, sure, where people are worth nothing, a world where what
people say on the street can be used against them. Its crimes against
humanity really, but you know, Google is not good at human
understanding
and stuff.


What does going to libraries, copying books and profiting from those
copies mean?
Can you do it? Not really. Infringing on culture and humanity
unilaterally.
Aside the truth, I have to play a dumb person in the US court, and
if I don't the initial reaction of an American citizen to such
language is
that I am crazy.


This is gonna be hard because of the prej.


not hungary vs. the usa. this is a class of action on behalf of
people
who use internet. this is not about crazy for daring. this is about
leg.

legg.

Legicimy, so the court needs to decide if they agree with
that ideas that is that they are not legicimy for the people
of the usars of the intrinet. because they money for off the
people.

lej.




I am suing on your behalf. I haven't met one person online
that I like. But your human rights.

Corruption is totalitarianism of private interests (see commercial
interest in libraries) resulting in the violation of all others.
Back to top
gb7648
science forum Guru


Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 606

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:51 pm    Post subject: Re: Google affair Reply with quote

Quote:
Two public domains in question here: usenet and book libraries.

Anything wrong with the idea of going to public libraries, copying
books
and profiting from those copies? Something tells us that that is
illegal.
Libraries are not offering materials for profit, but for reading.
So anyway, Google is breaking a long tradition, that all things
for free out there are opportunities for billions to make.


Infringing on public domains which do not belong to Google
are piracies and illegitimate business.


As with book libraries Google infringed on the non-commerical
public domain of usenet and profits on the 'content' of general
communication, and in libraries on the books served for free,
but Google took the book materials for their commercial needs.
Not allowed, in both cases Google shouldn't infringe unilaterally
on public domains as such act is piracy and illegitimate business.


1. Not only Google infringes on freely served public domains,
they infringe on the public domains unilaterally (take it all,
archive, document it all, no questions asked, Google believes
its free so it can be acquired.

2. Infringing on the content of public domain materials is piracy
as those domains do not belong and cannot belong to Google
unilaterally. Since they cannot belong to Google but to the
public, Google infringed on these domains unilaterally.


3. The contents of general communication are sensitive to
privacy concerns but Google ignored these concerns at large.


4. Google builds profiles on usenet users, personal profiles
on people online, and some people who turn to usenet
from their homes may not even have a webpage of their own,
but Google freerly builds profiles on people's lives online
based on the content of their communication in usenet.
With this act Google runs people's lives online facelessly
through a massive violation of privacy rights (Google runs'
many people's lives and bussinesses in illegitimate
forms, and I am here to ask to stop their infringment
on public domains as its illegal and causes bizarre
and illegal privacy violations from the source of having
these domains pirated in the first place. Google's Groups
Beta and their Library Project are built on illegal piracies
and this class action suit focuses on the source
of these piracies as illegitimate and violating business
culture.


5.




5. Google is in the process of scanning 15 million books
from the greatest Library sources from Prestigious
Universities such as from the libraries of Yale, Stanford, etc.
While Google received a permit these prestigious
libraries, these libraries do not represent the need to
understand the laws behind these acquisitions. Google
shouldn't and can't infringe on book library materials
for their commercial interests. Why these prestigious
universities allowed access to millions of books from
their libraries for Google's financial profiting on these
books is a mystery.

6. Google shouldn't and can't infringe on the content
of general communication materials found in usenet
online for their commercial interest as profiting on
the content of general communication on domains
not owned by Google is piracy on the materials
found on the non-commercial based communication
content of usenet.


91. ...


Conclusion: Google cannot legitimately acquire the contents
of free materials found on public domains for building
commercial business systems around the contents of
those materials which do not belong to Google in the
first place. Such infringments are mass piracies
as they take place in a take it all form unilaterally for
Google's profit interests as such infringments represent
piracy on publically shared non-commercial properties,
and piracy is illegitimate business practice. No other
large telecommuniction company can allow themselves
to profit on the contents of general communication.
They and all companies providing access to communication
online can only profit legitimately by providing communication
tools, but not by profiting from the content of general
communiciation contents, as Google does by profiting
on the instant and permanent documentation of the
content of prior communications made under usenet.


Google went for the source and pirated these materials
highly arrogantly and deliberately ignorantly toward
privacy concerns in regards to infringing unilaterally
on the communication documents found in public domains
for Google's financial interets. Piracy is illegitimate business
practice, and as illegitimate and intruding business
all people using the Internet and access its public communication
services from their homes need to protect themselves
from illegitimate forms of businesses infringing on their
private lives.


Due to these products from Google are being based on
mass infringments by their core sources of pirating business
mentality, I am asking for the banning of Google's Groups
Beta and Library Project for not having established legitimate
business grounds for profiting on domains whicch do not
belong to Google and contain materials which are not
for commercial sale such as general communication online
or books in libraries. Google runs illegal business with these
two products.



- Class action on suing Google for illegitimate and criminal
piracies. -



Correction: Products which are *based on* illegimate and criminal
piracy grounds.


...*based on* illegitimate and illegal piracy grounds.

don't let yourselves being taken advantage of misters, online,
by unilteral piracies.


1. Correct from

1. Not only Google infringes on freely served public domains,
they infringe on the public domains unilaterally (take it all,
archive, document it all, no questions asked, Google believes
its free so it can be acquired.


to


1. Not only Google infringes on materials that are accessible
on freely served public domains for their commercial benefit,
Google infringes on the public domains in a unilateral (take
it all, archive, document it all, no questions asked. Google
believes its free, so it can be acquired and profited on with
or without consideration if such (unilateral) acquisition involves the
illegitimacy of piracy.



1. Not only Google infringes on materials that are accessible
on freely served public domains for their commercial benefit,
Google infringes on the public domains in a unilateral (take
it all, archive, document it all, no questions asked) form, Google
believes its free, so it can be acquired and profited on with
or without consideration if such (unilateral) acquisition involves
illegitimacy of (mass) piracy.


If I am so much more right in the first place, its stupid that I
have to be so perfect in the explanations. The world's stupidest
religious fanatic pirates. But they win because the judge
smiles toward them, and not toward me in court.


90 percent of jobs are not gained based on knowledge, but
based on smiles, the same in US courts (which should be
illegal, but I am not suing the US court system. the secret
of the american smile).


It is the destinee of the Hangayrians to kick out Gooogle and
leave this haunted house where there are people taalking.



Final argument:

What does Google's infringment on general communication 'content' on
public domains mean? Google commercially documents general
communication made
from people's homes, and does it with material they accessed from
public
(non-Google-owned) domains. It means infringing on general public
materials
and profiting from their content is infringment (or piracy) on
people's lives.
[Google treats people as if what they say from home is a matter of
urgency
and needs sponsoring globally. But that's just really annoying and a
downgrading sideeffect of a product which is based on an illegitimate



piracy.] Can you sell general communication content? In Ceausescu's
Romania, sure, where people are worth nothing, a world where what
people say on the street can be used against them. Its crimes against
humanity really, but you know, Google is not good at human
understanding
and stuff.


What does going to libraries, copying books and profiting from those
copies mean?
Can you do it? Not really. Infringing on culture and humanity
unilaterally.
Aside the truth, I have to play a dumb person in the US court, and
if I don't the initial reaction of an American citizen to such
language is
that I am crazy.


This is gonna be hard because of the prej.


not hungary vs. the usa. this is a class of action on behalf of
people
who use internet. this is not about crazy for daring. this is about
leg.

legg.

Legicimy, so the court needs to decide if they agree with
that ideas that is that they are not legicimy for the people
of the usars of the intrinet. because they money for off the
people.

lej.




I am suing on your behalf. I haven't met one person online
that I like. But your human rights.

Corruption is totalitarianism of private interests (see commercial
interest in libraries) resulting in the violation of all others.

How can I attack Google, if Bush is doing the same Ceusescuian
abuse of power filled with private interest-related corruptions and
fascist police mentalities.
Back to top
gb7648
science forum Guru


Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 606

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:53 pm    Post subject: Re: Google affair Reply with quote

Quote:
How can I attack Google, if Bush is doing the same Ceusescuian
abuse of power filled with private interest-related corruptions and
fascist police mentalities.

Its just corruption of the rich in power.
Back to top
gb7648
science forum Guru


Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 606

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:55 pm    Post subject: Re: Google affair Reply with quote

Quote:
How can I attack Google, if Bush is doing the same Ceusescuian
abuse of power filled with private interest-related corruptions and
fascist police mentalities.

Its just corruption of the rich in power.

Prej and unilat.
Back to top
gb7648
science forum Guru


Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 606

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:57 pm    Post subject: Re: Google affair Reply with quote

Quote:
How can I attack Google, if Bush is doing the same Ceusescuian
abuse of power filled with private interest-related corruptions and
fascist police mentalities.

Its just corruption of the rich in power.

Prej and unilat.

The blinded emperor kills.

The sighted human avances toward killing the blinded emperor.
Back to top
gb7648
science forum Guru


Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 606

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:02 pm    Post subject: Re: Google affair Reply with quote

Quote:
How can I attack Google, if Bush is doing the same Ceusescuian
abuse of power filled with private interest-related corruptions and
fascist police mentalities.

Its just corruption of the rich in power.

Prej and unilat.

The blinded emperor kills.

The sighted human avances toward killing the blinded emperor.

Disadvantage reversed. Him taking advantage of the government
and with it of the people, though sick rich, the sickrich of
ceausescu,
govern-mental abuse and prej, the unilatr's head meets a forehead,
a revolution of one.
Back to top
gb7648
science forum Guru


Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 606

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:20 pm    Post subject: Re: Google affair Reply with quote

Quote:
How can I attack Google, if Bush is doing the same Ceusescuian
abuse of power filled with private interest-related corruptions and
fascist police mentalities.

Its just corruption of the rich in power.

Prej and unilat.

The blinded emperor kills.

The sighted human avances toward killing the blinded emperor.

Disadvantage reversed. Him taking advantage of the government
and with it of the people, though sick rich, the sickrich of
ceausescu,
govern-mental abuse and prej, the unilatr's head meets a forehead,
a revolution of one.

The genocidal judge, perhaps the blinded emper, serving the rich
in power, and the crimes go unnoticed. I was warned that to have
a chance against Google, only the top law firms compete against
the unilat, with prices for such a lawsuit starting from twenty meg.
The world of prej unilat corruption and genocidal judges the task
is sick for a human disadvant.
Back to top
gb7648
science forum Guru


Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 606

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:24 pm    Post subject: Re: Google affair Reply with quote

Quote:
How can I attack Google, if Bush is doing the same Ceusescuian
abuse of power filled with private interest-related corruptions and
fascist police mentalities.

Its just corruption of the rich in power.

Prej and unilat.

The blinded emperor kills.

The sighted human avances toward killing the blinded emperor.

Disadvantage reversed. Him taking advantage of the government
and with it of the people, though sick rich, the sickrich of
ceausescu,
govern-mental abuse and prej, the unilatr's head meets a forehead,
a revolution of one.

The genocidal judge, perhaps the blinded emper, serving the rich
in power, and the crimes go unnoticed. I was warned that to have
a chance against Google, only the top law firms compete against
the unilat, with prices for such a lawsuit starting from twenty meg.
The world of prej unilat corruption and genocidal judges the task
is sick for a human disadvant.

The game is money, Beautiful Mind knew, and money knew no limits
and the gestapo was foreheaded anyway by one revolution. The sick
mind of the emper-head, inability to see common sense, votes
for the kill, serving the rich. Kill is more within than head.
Back to top
gb7648
science forum Guru


Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 606

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:32 pm    Post subject: Re: Google affair Reply with quote

Quote:
How can I attack Google, if Bush is doing the same Ceusescuian
abuse of power filled with private interest-related corruptions and
fascist police mentalities.

Its just corruption of the rich in power.

Prej and unilat.

The blinded emperor kills.

The sighted human avances toward killing the blinded emperor.

Disadvantage reversed. Him taking advantage of the government
and with it of the people, though sick rich, the sickrich of
ceausescu,
govern-mental abuse and prej, the unilatr's head meets a forehead,
a revolution of one.

The genocidal judge, perhaps the blinded emper, serving the rich
in power, and the crimes go unnoticed. I was warned that to have
a chance against Google, only the top law firms compete against
the unilat, with prices for such a lawsuit starting from twenty meg.
The world of prej unilat corruption and genocidal judges the task
is sick for a human disadvant.

The game is money, Beautiful Mind knew, and money knew no limits
and the gestapo was foreheaded anyway by one revolution. The sick
mind of the emper-head, inability to see common sense, votes
for the kill, serving the rich. Kill is more within than head.

Bumper: Kill is more within than head.

Its something which cause vomit of other drivers behind and
accidents and jailing. That's war.
Back to top
gb7648
science forum Guru


Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 606

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 4:44 pm    Post subject: Re: Google affair Reply with quote

Quote:
How can I attack Google, if Bush is doing the same Ceusescuian
abuse of power filled with private interest-related corruptions and
fascist police mentalities.

Its just corruption of the rich in power.

Prej and unilat.

The blinded emperor kills.

The sighted human avances toward killing the blinded emperor.

Disadvantage reversed. Him taking advantage of the government
and with it of the people, though sick rich, the sickrich of
ceausescu,
govern-mental abuse and prej, the unilatr's head meets a forehead,
a revolution of one.

The genocidal judge, perhaps the blinded emper, serving the rich
in power, and the crimes go unnoticed. I was warned that to have
a chance against Google, only the top law firms compete against
the unilat, with prices for such a lawsuit starting from twenty meg.
The world of prej unilat corruption and genocidal judges the task
is sick for a human disadvant.

The game is money, Beautiful Mind knew, and money knew no limits
and the gestapo was foreheaded anyway by one revolution. The sick
mind of the emper-head, inability to see common sense, votes
for the kill, serving the rich. Kill is more within than head.

Bumper: Kill is more within than head.

Its something which cause vomit of other drivers behind and
accidents and jailing. That's war.

I mean beneath it all, is that simplicity. Is it legitimate to go to
a library, and for commercial reasons copy all the books.

You know?

Or go to any other free public source, and for commercial reasons
copy all the contents, even if the contents are of general
communication..
General communication, sold by the content, taken not from their
corporate domains, but from public sources and of course infringing
on millions of things.

Illegitimate piracy.
Back to top
gb7648
science forum Guru


Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 606

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 4:47 pm    Post subject: Re: Google affair Reply with quote

Quote:
How can I attack Google, if Bush is doing the same Ceusescuian
abuse of power filled with private interest-related corruptions and
fascist police mentalities.

Its just corruption of the rich in power.

Prej and unilat.

The blinded emperor kills.

The sighted human avances toward killing the blinded emperor.

Disadvantage reversed. Him taking advantage of the government
and with it of the people, though sick rich, the sickrich of
ceausescu,
govern-mental abuse and prej, the unilatr's head meets a forehead,
a revolution of one.

The genocidal judge, perhaps the blinded emper, serving the rich
in power, and the crimes go unnoticed. I was warned that to have
a chance against Google, only the top law firms compete against
the unilat, with prices for such a lawsuit starting from twenty meg.
The world of prej unilat corruption and genocidal judges the task
is sick for a human disadvant.

The game is money, Beautiful Mind knew, and money knew no limits
and the gestapo was foreheaded anyway by one revolution. The sick
mind of the emper-head, inability to see common sense, votes
for the kill, serving the rich. Kill is more within than head.

Bumper: Kill is more within than head.

Its something which cause vomit of other drivers behind and
accidents and jailing. That's war.

I mean beneath it all, is that simplicity. Is it legitimate to go to
a library, and for commercial reasons copy all the books.

You know?

Or go to any other free public source, and for commercial reasons
copy all the contents, even if the contents are of general
communication..
General communication, sold by the content, taken not from their
corporate domains, but from public sources and of course infringing
on millions of things.

Illegitimate piracy.

p.s. Google also went for the videos, all these copyright sensitive
things
surrounding Google. But let's not complicate the case. Let's get
free videos, that's all they are going to have left.
Back to top
gb7648
science forum Guru


Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 606

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 5:05 pm    Post subject: Re: Google affair Reply with quote

Quote:
How can I attack Google, if Bush is doing the same Ceusescuian
abuse of power filled with private interest-related corruptions and
fascist police mentalities.

Its just corruption of the rich in power.

Prej and unilat.

The blinded emperor kills.

The sighted human avances toward killing the blinded emperor.

Disadvantage reversed. Him taking advantage of the government
and with it of the people, though sick rich, the sickrich of
ceausescu,
govern-mental abuse and prej, the unilatr's head meets a forehead,
a revolution of one.

The genocidal judge, perhaps the blinded emper, serving the rich
in power, and the crimes go unnoticed. I was warned that to have
a chance against Google, only the top law firms compete against
the unilat, with prices for such a lawsuit starting from twenty meg.
The world of prej unilat corruption and genocidal judges the task
is sick for a human disadvant.

The game is money, Beautiful Mind knew, and money knew no limits
and the gestapo was foreheaded anyway by one revolution. The sick
mind of the emper-head, inability to see common sense, votes
for the kill, serving the rich. Kill is more within than head.

Bumper: Kill is more within than head.

Its something which cause vomit of other drivers behind and
accidents and jailing. That's war.

I mean beneath it all, is that simplicity. Is it legitimate to go to
a library, and for commercial reasons copy all the books.

You know?

Or go to any other free public source, and for commercial reasons
copy all the contents, even if the contents are of general
communication..
General communication, sold by the content, taken not from their
corporate domains, but from public sources and of course infringing
on millions of things.

Illegitimate piracy.

p.s. Google also went for the videos, all these copyright sensitive
things
surrounding Google. But let's not complicate the case. Let's get
free videos, that's all they are going to have left.

Pirates. In days of slavery, these people were around, they had boats.
Their souls you know. Today they have capitalism, and an Internet,
a literal sea of information, and the head realized, a) that general
materials
bring millions of people. b) and where there are millions of people,
millions of marketers wish to send their messages to those visitors.

The concept is simple. Build large databases containing general
materials, as that is of interest of the general population. They
need
to do it. But what they end up taking is not right, not how they take
it, and not what they do with the materials.

They build profiles on people who come and go, and these conducts
in usenet are of general communication. Most of these people don't
even have their own web pages, but Google runs their lives, of course
extremely intrusively, and build personal profiles on millions of
people
online. This extreme sense of intrusitivity, and of course recognizing
that the base of these businesses are built on commercializing on
the content of general communication, well,

more of this where it belongs, in court.

Class Action Claims Google often bases their products on pirating
public sources of materials illegitimately! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha,
you think you have a chance. ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Like Stalin and his friends with big bellies laughing when hearing
strong words from some enemy.

Their power will be tested.
Back to top
gb7648
science forum Guru


Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 606

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 5:10 pm    Post subject: Re: Google affair Reply with quote

Quote:
How can I attack Google, if Bush is doing the same Ceusescuian
abuse of power filled with private interest-related corruptions and
fascist police mentalities.

Its just corruption of the rich in power.

Prej and unilat.

The blinded emperor kills.

The sighted human avances toward killing the blinded emperor.

Disadvantage reversed. Him taking advantage of the government
and with it of the people, though sick rich, the sickrich of
ceausescu,
govern-mental abuse and prej, the unilatr's head meets a forehead,
a revolution of one.

The genocidal judge, perhaps the blinded emper, serving the rich
in power, and the crimes go unnoticed. I was warned that to have
a chance against Google, only the top law firms compete against
the unilat, with prices for such a lawsuit starting from twenty meg.
The world of prej unilat corruption and genocidal judges the task
is sick for a human disadvant.

The game is money, Beautiful Mind knew, and money knew no limits
and the gestapo was foreheaded anyway by one revolution. The sick
mind of the emper-head, inability to see common sense, votes
for the kill, serving the rich. Kill is more within than head.

Bumper: Kill is more within than head.

Its something which cause vomit of other drivers behind and
accidents and jailing. That's war.

I mean beneath it all, is that simplicity. Is it legitimate to go to
a library, and for commercial reasons copy all the books.

You know?

Or go to any other free public source, and for commercial reasons
copy all the contents, even if the contents are of general
communication..
General communication, sold by the content, taken not from their
corporate domains, but from public sources and of course infringing
on millions of things.

Illegitimate piracy.

p.s. Google also went for the videos, all these copyright sensitive
things
surrounding Google. But let's not complicate the case. Let's get
free videos, that's all they are going to have left.

Pirates. In days of slavery, these people were around, they had boats.
Their souls you know. Today they have capitalism, and an Internet,
a literal sea of information, and the head realized, a) that general
materials
bring millions of people. b) and where there are millions of people,
millions of marketers wish to send their messages to those visitors.

The concept is simple. Build large databases containing general
materials, as that is of interest of the general population. They
need
to do it. But what they end up taking is not right, not how they take
it, and not what they do with the materials.

They build profiles on people who come and go, and these conducts
in usenet are of general communication. Most of these people don't
even have their own web pages, but Google runs their lives, of course
extremely intrusively, and build personal profiles on millions of
people
online. This extreme sense of intrusitivity, and of course recognizing
that the base of these businesses are built on commercializing on
the content of general communication, well,

more of this where it belongs, in court.

Class Action Claims Google often bases their products on pirating
public sources of materials illegitimately! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha,
you think you have a chance. ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Like Stalin and his friends with big bellies laughing when hearing
strong words from some enemy.

Their power will be tested.

Stalin stayed around as unilat for 30 years, but his legacy was
not over for a few more decades. Google cannot have more than
60 years of pirate powers of running other people's lives
and businesses via unilat over the Internet.
Back to top
gb7648
science forum Guru


Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 606

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 5:15 pm    Post subject: Re: Google affair Reply with quote

Quote:
How can I attack Google, if Bush is doing the same Ceusescuian
abuse of power filled with private interest-related corruptions and
fascist police mentalities.

Its just corruption of the rich in power.

Prej and unilat.

The blinded emperor kills.

The sighted human avances toward killing the blinded emperor.

Disadvantage reversed. Him taking advantage of the government
and with it of the people, though sick rich, the sickrich of
ceausescu,
govern-mental abuse and prej, the unilatr's head meets a forehead,
a revolution of one.

The genocidal judge, perhaps the blinded emper, serving the rich
in power, and the crimes go unnoticed. I was warned that to have
a chance against Google, only the top law firms compete against
the unilat, with prices for such a lawsuit starting from twenty meg.
The world of prej unilat corruption and genocidal judges the task
is sick for a human disadvant.

The game is money, Beautiful Mind knew, and money knew no limits
and the gestapo was foreheaded anyway by one revolution. The sick
mind of the emper-head, inability to see common sense, votes
for the kill, serving the rich. Kill is more within than head.

Bumper: Kill is more within than head.

Its something which cause vomit of other drivers behind and
accidents and jailing. That's war.

I mean beneath it all, is that simplicity. Is it legitimate to go to
a library, and for commercial reasons copy all the books.

You know?

Or go to any other free public source, and for commercial reasons
copy all the contents, even if the contents are of general
communication..
General communication, sold by the content, taken not from their
corporate domains, but from public sources and of course infringing
on millions of things.

Illegitimate piracy.

p.s. Google also went for the videos, all these copyright sensitive
things
surrounding Google. But let's not complicate the case. Let's get
free videos, that's all they are going to have left.

Pirates. In days of slavery, these people were around, they had boats.
Their souls you know. Today they have capitalism, and an Internet,
a literal sea of information, and the head realized, a) that general
materials
bring millions of people. b) and where there are millions of people,
millions of marketers wish to send their messages to those visitors.

The concept is simple. Build large databases containing general
materials, as that is of interest of the general population. They
need
to do it. But what they end up taking is not right, not how they take
it, and not what they do with the materials.

They build profiles on people who come and go, and these conducts
in usenet are of general communication. Most of these people don't
even have their own web pages, but Google runs their lives, of course
extremely intrusively, and build personal profiles on millions of
people
online. This extreme sense of intrusitivity, and of course recognizing
that the base of these businesses are built on commercializing on
the content of general communication, well,

more of this where it belongs, in court.

Class Action Claims Google often bases their products on pirating
public sources of materials illegitimately! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha,
you think you have a chance. ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Like Stalin and his friends with big bellies laughing when hearing
strong words from some enemy.

Their power will be tested.

Stalin stayed around as unilat for 30 years, but his legacy was
not over for a few more decades. Google cannot have more than
60 years of pirate powers of running other people's lives
and businesses via unilat over the Internet.

And as unilat corruption, they parish as pirates scumming
global resources illegitimately. Their fascist unilat of the
Internet
with extreme radical ignorance of human understanding (people
and cultures) faces the dumbest ever realization that they are
the lowest scums of humanity.
Back to top
gb7648
science forum Guru


Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 606

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 5:18 pm    Post subject: Re: Google affair Reply with quote

Quote:
How can I attack Google, if Bush is doing the same Ceusescuian
abuse of power filled with private interest-related corruptions and
fascist police mentalities.

Its just corruption of the rich in power.

Prej and unilat.

The blinded emperor kills.

The sighted human avances toward killing the blinded emperor.

Disadvantage reversed. Him taking advantage of the government
and with it of the people, though sick rich, the sickrich of
ceausescu,
govern-mental abuse and prej, the unilatr's head meets a forehead,
a revolution of one.

The genocidal judge, perhaps the blinded emper, serving the rich
in power, and the crimes go unnoticed. I was warned that to have
a chance against Google, only the top law firms compete against
the unilat, with prices for such a lawsuit starting from twenty meg.
The world of prej unilat corruption and genocidal judges the task
is sick for a human disadvant.

The game is money, Beautiful Mind knew, and money knew no limits
and the gestapo was foreheaded anyway by one revolution. The sick
mind of the emper-head, inability to see common sense, votes
for the kill, serving the rich. Kill is more within than head.

Bumper: Kill is more within than head.

Its something which cause vomit of other drivers behind and
accidents and jailing. That's war.

I mean beneath it all, is that simplicity. Is it legitimate to go to
a library, and for commercial reasons copy all the books.

You know?

Or go to any other free public source, and for commercial reasons
copy all the contents, even if the contents are of general
communication..
General communication, sold by the content, taken not from their
corporate domains, but from public sources and of course infringing
on millions of things.

Illegitimate piracy.

p.s. Google also went for the videos, all these copyright sensitive
things
surrounding Google. But let's not complicate the case. Let's get
free videos, that's all they are going to have left.

Pirates. In days of slavery, these people were around, they had boats.
Their souls you know. Today they have capitalism, and an Internet,
a literal sea of information, and the head realized, a) that general
materials
bring millions of people. b) and where there are millions of people,
millions of marketers wish to send their messages to those visitors.

The concept is simple. Build large databases containing general
materials, as that is of interest of the general population. They
need
to do it. But what they end up taking is not right, not how they take
it, and not what they do with the materials.

They build profiles on people who come and go, and these conducts
in usenet are of general communication. Most of these people don't
even have their own web pages, but Google runs their lives, of course
extremely intrusively, and build personal profiles on millions of
people
online. This extreme sense of intrusitivity, and of course recognizing
that the base of these businesses are built on commercializing on
the content of general communication, well,

more of this where it belongs, in court.

Class Action Claims Google often bases their products on pirating
public sources of materials illegitimately! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha,
you think you have a chance. ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

Like Stalin and his friends with big bellies laughing when hearing
strong words from some enemy.

Their power will be tested.

Stalin stayed around as unilat for 30 years, but his legacy was
not over for a few more decades. Google cannot have more than
60 years of pirate powers of running other people's lives
and businesses via unilat over the Internet.

And as unilat corruption, they parish as pirates scumming
global resources illegitimately. Their fascist unilat of the
Internet
with extreme radical ignorance of human understanding (people
and cultures) faces the dumbest ever realization that they are
the lowest scums of humanity.

In museums they often do not allow video cameras.
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 2 [29 Posts] Goto page:  1, 2 Next
View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Sun Jun 25, 2017 3:26 am | All times are GMT
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics » New Theories
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts Final on Google gb6724 New Theories 0 Sun Jul 16, 2006 7:57 pm
No new posts POSTSCIENTISM AGAINST POSTMODERNISM (SOKAL AFFAIR AND COL... Pentcho Valev Relativity 5 Fri Jul 07, 2006 4:41 pm
No new posts Help Decoding A Google Challenge CoreyWhite@gmail.com num-analysis 1 Sat Jun 10, 2006 12:37 pm
No new posts Government watching people, but so does mother on Google gb6724 New Theories 15 Mon May 29, 2006 8:44 am
No new posts WITH THOSE GOO GOO GOOGLE Y EYES -- Sleazeball Science Si... Ed Conrad Chem 0 Wed May 24, 2006 12:37 pm

Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Electronics forum |  Medicine forum |  Unix/Linux blog |  Unix/Linux documentation |  Unix/Linux forums  |  send newsletters
 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.0415s ][ Queries: 16 (0.0035s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]