FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics » Strings
11-Dimensional Chirality?
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [3 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
m_brain
science forum beginner


Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:58 pm    Post subject: 11-Dimensional Chirality? Reply with quote

I just read a book by Davies and Brown entitled
"_Superstrings:_A_Theory_of_Everything_?"

They dismiss 11D theory as having a fatal flaw: -"A distinctive element
of the weak interaction is that it breaks left-right mirror symmetry.
This implies that elementary particles must be endowed with a definite
handedness, or 'chirality'...It turns out that definite chirality only
exists in spaces with an odd number of dimensions. This means that
space must have an odd number of dimensions, and hence spacetime must
have an even number of dimensions, otherwise there would be no
chirality in the laws of nature. In short, eleven spacetime dimensions
won't work."-

Any thoughts?

[Moderator's note: While it's true that M-theory on smooth spaces gives
left-right symmetric physics, M-theory compactified on singular spaces
generically leads to asymmetric, chiral theories. This is why M-theory
on singular G_2 manifolds offers realistic backgrounds that may match
reality. Another way how chiral, asymmetric theories can occur from
M-theory is in the context of M-theory on two-torus which is not a
9-dimensional symmetric theory but a 10-dimensional asymmetric one. LM]

--
m_brain
------------------------------------------------------------------------
m_brain's Profile: http://www.physicsforums.com/forums/member.php?action=getinfo&userid=24458
View this thread: http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=66834
Back to top
Crosson
science forum beginner


Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:59 pm    Post subject: Re: 11-Dimensional Chirality? Reply with quote

There are better reasons for why 11 dimensional spacetime is rediculous.

[Moderator's note: The word should be spelled "ridiculous". But strictly
speaking, it is not impossible that someone learns how to judge ideas
about quantum gravity before he learns how to write. LM]

Sure Einstein overthrew classical space and time single handedly, but
he was guided by evidence and physical principles.

Remember that scientific theories are not "correct", they only serve to
organize our observations (according to organizational principles.)
Therefore, its not that the universe has 11 dimensions, its that the
best way to explain the universe is using 11 dimensions. And to me, 11
dimensions is not a very good way to explain anything (begs more
questions than it resolves).


--
Crosson
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crosson's Profile: http://www.physicsforums.com/forums/member.php?action=getinfo&userid=21862
View this thread: http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=66834
Back to top
m_brain
science forum beginner


Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 9:00 pm    Post subject: Re: 11-Dimensional Chirality? Reply with quote

What are some of the better reasons?

Crosson Wrote:

Quote:
There are better reasons for why 11 dimensional spacetime is rediculous.


Sure Einstein overthrew classical space and time single handedly, but
he was guided by evidence and physical principles.

Remember that scientific theories are not "correct", they only serve to
organize our observations (according to organizational principles.)
Therefore, its not that the universe has 11 dimensions, its that the
best way to explain the universe is using 11 dimensions. And to me, 11
dimensions is not a very good way to explain anything (begs more
questions than it resolves).


--
m_brain
------------------------------------------------------------------------
m_brain's Profile: http://www.physicsforums.com/forums/member.php?action=getinfo&userid=24458
View this thread: http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=66834
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [3 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Wed Jun 28, 2017 10:51 pm | All times are GMT
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics » Strings
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts 4 dimensional "cylinder" problem Mateusz Berezecki Math 3 Wed Jun 28, 2006 1:42 pm
No new posts Two-dimensional correlation analysis information mondaymystery@hotmail.com Math 0 Mon Jun 12, 2006 3:21 am
No new posts Distribution of radial distances in n-dimensional symmetr... sales@kt-algorithms.com Math 0 Wed May 31, 2006 12:10 am
No new posts 3 Dimensional Random Walk Jim Dars Recreational 5 Sat May 27, 2006 8:32 pm
No new posts "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity" Moc Relativity 0 Sun May 21, 2006 1:42 pm

Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Electronics forum |  Medicine forum |  Unix/Linux blog |  Unix/Linux documentation |  Unix/Linux forums  |  send newsletters
 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.0279s ][ Queries: 16 (0.0051s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]