Author 
Message 
Nikyu science forum beginner
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 4

Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 8:49 pm Post subject:
cantilever beam model



I'm trying to figure out a simple way of determining the first natural
frequency of a cantilever beam. I figured it would be just like a
massspring system where the frequency is equal to the square root of
spring constant over mass...but how do I determine the equivalent mass
and spring constant of a cantilever beam?
Thanks,
Nikyu 

Back to top 


Olin Perry Norton science forum addict
Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 58

Posted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 10:14 pm Post subject:
Re: cantilever beam model



eryk33@netscape.net wrote:
Quote:  I'm trying to figure out a simple way of determining the first natural
frequency of a cantilever beam. I figured it would be just like a
massspring system where the frequency is equal to the square root of
spring constant over mass...but how do I determine the equivalent mass
and spring constant of a cantilever beam?
Thanks,
Nikyu
You know, I'm sure, that the most accurate way to solve this 
problem is to work with the PDE that describes the beam deflection
Y as a function of distance X and time T.
You say you want a simple method, based on a massspring
type of model. Some people call this a "lumpedparameter"
model  if you Google that term together with cantilever, beam,
and vibrate I bet you'll find your answer.
To find the spring constant, use the equation for (static) bending
of a beam with a force applied at the end, and your spring constant
is just the force divided by the deflection.
To get the mass, you lump a certain fraction (I forgot how much,
sorry) of the beam mass at the free end. 

Back to top 


BobK207 science forum addict
Joined: 12 May 2005
Posts: 52

Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 12:21 am Post subject:
Re: cantilever beam model



Olin Perry Norton wrote:
Quote:  eryk33@netscape.net wrote:
I'm trying to figure out a simple way of determining the first natural
frequency of a cantilever beam. I figured it would be just like a
massspring system where the frequency is equal to the square root of
spring constant over mass...but how do I determine the equivalent mass
and spring constant of a cantilever beam?
Thanks,
Nikyu
You know, I'm sure, that the most accurate way to solve this
problem is to work with the PDE that describes the beam deflection
Y as a function of distance X and time T.
You say you want a simple method, based on a massspring
type of model. Some people call this a "lumpedparameter"
model  if you Google that term together with cantilever, beam,
and vibrate I bet you'll find your answer.
To find the spring constant, use the equation for (static) bending
of a beam with a force applied at the end, and your spring constant
is just the force divided by the deflection.
To get the mass, you lump a certain fraction (I forgot how much,
sorry) of the beam mass at the free end.

get a copy of Mark's Mechaincal Engineering Handbook
check out
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RayleighRitz_method
my recollection is that Meffective = 1/3 mass total but my memory
could be faulty
http://wwwex.physik.uniulm.de/lehre/physikalischeelektronik/phys_elektr/node298.html
has the answer embeded in the equations but I'm too lazy to back
calculate it.
cheers
Bob 

Back to top 


Greg Locock science forum Guru Wannabe
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 111

Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 7:43 am Post subject:
Re: cantilever beam model



"BobK207" <rkazanjy@gmail.com> wrote in
news:1144801283.748453.132650@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
Quote: 
Olin Perry Norton wrote:
eryk33@netscape.net wrote:
I'm trying to figure out a simple way of determining the first
natural frequency of a cantilever beam. I figured it would be just
like a massspring system where the frequency is equal to the square
root of spring constant over mass...but how do I determine the
equivalent mass and spring constant of a cantilever beam?
Thanks,
Nikyu
You know, I'm sure, that the most accurate way to solve this
problem is to work with the PDE that describes the beam deflection
Y as a function of distance X and time T.
You say you want a simple method, based on a massspring
type of model. Some people call this a "lumpedparameter"
model  if you Google that term together with cantilever, beam,
and vibrate I bet you'll find your answer.
To find the spring constant, use the equation for (static) bending
of a beam with a force applied at the end, and your spring constant
is just the force divided by the deflection.
To get the mass, you lump a certain fraction (I forgot how much,
sorry) of the beam mass at the free end.
get a copy of Mark's Mechaincal Engineering Handbook
check out
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RayleighRitz_method
my recollection is that Meffective = 1/3 mass total but my memory
could be faulty
http://wwwex.physik.uniulm.de/lehre/physikalischeelektronik/phys_elekt
r/node298.html
has the answer embeded in the equations but I'm too lazy to back
calculate it.

And for that you use the tip stiffness?
That's a fine wiki article, a model of accuracy, brevity and wit, worth every
penny. It would be nice if someone could check it, actually.
Another approach is by considering the upper and lower bounds.
An upper bound solution would be to take all the mass and the stiffness half way
along the beam.
A lower bound solution would be to use all the mass, and the tip stiffness.
So you know the frequency must fall into that band.
sqrt(8*k/m)>F/2/pi>sqrt(k/m)
Bob's suggestion of sqrt(3*k/m) would fall nicely in the middle of that band.
A better approximation might be to say (after thinking about the likely mode
shape) that the stiffness 3/4 of the way along, and 1/2 the mass, is probably
pretty close.
F/2/pi ~ sqrt(k*(4/3)^3/(m*.5)) = sqrt((128/27)*k/m) ~ sqrt(4.3*k/m)
and so on and so forth
Another way of calculating it would be to build an FEA model.
SO the OP has at least 3 good options (PDE, Rayleigh Ritz, FEA, guessing).
In practice RR is terrific for real conditions, such as strangely shaped beams,
and springy foundations.
Cheers
Greg Locock 

Back to top 


Gordon153 science forum beginner
Joined: 19 Oct 2005
Posts: 28

Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 12:30 pm Post subject:
Re: cantilever beam model



eryk33@netscape.net wrote:
Quote:  I'm trying to figure out a simple way of determining the first natural
frequency of a cantilever beam. I figured it would be just like a
massspring system where the frequency is equal to the square root of
spring constant over mass...but how do I determine the equivalent mass
and spring constant of a cantilever beam?

The simplest way is to look up the correct formula. For beams with a
variety of B.C., the natural frequency is
omega=2 pi f=a sqrt(EI/(mL^4)), where m=mass per unit length. For a
cantilever, a=3.52. 

Back to top 


BobK207 science forum addict
Joined: 12 May 2005
Posts: 52

Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 7:43 pm Post subject:
Re: cantilever beam model



Been a LONG time since I checked this but I'm pretty sure that
using 1/3 of the total mass AND the tip stiffness (3EI) / (L^3)
gives a very good approximation, so good that FEA is hardly worth the
effort
cheers
Bob
Sorry, I only took a 5 sec look at the WIki article...............it
was just something to get him thinking about energy methods 

Back to top 


Google


Back to top 



The time now is Sat Oct 20, 2018 1:59 am  All times are GMT

