|
|
| Author |
Message |
Charles Cagle
science forum beginner
Joined: 16 Sep 2005
Posts: 11
|
 Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 1:25 am Post subject:
Re: Strong Force vs. EM
|
|
|
How about the so-called 'Strong Force' is really entirely electromagnetic in
nature? It isn't that difficult to prove that it is so but this simplicity
forces qluons and quarks to evaporate back into the pseudoscientific mist
from which they arose. The intellectual inertia given these fictions will
oppose the truth.
-- Peace to the followers of Jesus Christ -
For email remove the underscores in my email.
Charles Cagle
On 7/7/05 19:09, in article 42cde0a3_3@newsfeed.slurp.net, "Rick Nelson"
<rainbow07@copper.net> wrote:
| Quote: | It depends on the Coulomb force geometry. Point particles of charge do
interact in inverse square ways.
But what if there were some crystalline material that "tunneled" point
charges into more specific collision zones? That's a Coulomb effect - a
kind of fusion catalyst.
What are we string to accomplish with fusee9n confined toroids?
Magnetic plus cCpi;0,gb effect?
A cheszeee just popped ny heart brain out and sped off on an electric
scooter. He is pfo a lbly a sergeaagent in the Upper Q ARLINGTON POLICE
IN UPPER ARLINGTON OHIO..\\\
Phil Weldon wrote:
'Rob Nicol' wrote, in part:
| During a nuclear reaction such as fission or fusion, the strong nuclear
| forces presides. Since this force dwarfs the electromagnetic force, the
| potential energy excess can be enormous! However, the activation energy
for
| such reactions is also comparatively huge.
Seemingly the 'cold fusion' claim is that somehow the atoms of Deturium are
induced to approach closely enough so that the residual strong force
overcomes the electromagnetic force, by means other than increasing the
kinetic energy. At least that's what I think the cold fusionists are
saying. The strong force IS stronger than the electromagnetic force, by a
factor 1/137, but only over a short distance not much more than the nuclear
radius; it does not vary as the inverse square of distance. The EM force
does vary as the inverse square of distance.
Some say the method the cold fusionists use is 'hand waving'.
Phil Weldon
"Rob Nicol" <robertgnicol@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:DOXye.7128$Ud.841866@news20.bellglobal.com...
I'm not a physics expert. However, in this "controversy" over whether or
not Cold Fusion is legitimate there is one very important underlying
factor
which cannot be ignored. Fusion is a nuclear process; not a chemical
process.
During chemical processes the electromagnetic force reigns. Using the
simpler Bohr-Rutherford model to explain these occurances, small amounts
of
activation energy are required to break the molecular bonds of the
reactants
in order that atoms can rearrange. If the products store less chemical
potential energy than the reactants, this excess energy is released.
During a nuclear reaction such as fission or fusion, the strong nuclear
forces presides. Since this force dwarfs the electromagnetic force, the
potential energy excess can be enormous! However, the activation energy
for
such reactions is also comparatively huge.
Such energies are not readily supplied by chemical means! I should
think that these facts alone should give any individual cause to doubt any
claims of Cold Fusion.
|
-- Peace to the followers of Jesus Christ -
For email remove the underscores in my email.
Charles Cagle |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cary Jamison
science forum beginner
Joined: 29 Apr 2005
Posts: 39
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 6:58 pm Post subject:
Re: Strong Force vs. EM
|
|
|
Charles Cagle wrote:
<snip>
It never ceases to amaze me that whenever Chuckie comes back from one of his
long hiatuses, he starts with responding to posts so old that OP is long
gone and no one remembers the topic.
Does he really have time to go back and read through a year's worth of old
posts in this group?
Cary |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Google
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
The time now is Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:06 am | All times are GMT
|
|
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
|
|
Other DeniX Solutions sites:
Electronics forum |
Medicine forum |
Unix/Linux blog |
Unix/Linux documentation |
Unix/Linux forums |
send newsletters
|
| |
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Forum index
»
Science and Technology
»
Physics
»
Fusion
