Author 
Message 
Squark science forum beginner
Joined: 14 May 2005
Posts: 33

Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 2:37 pm Post subject:
Mathematical Basis of BohrSommerfeld



Hello everyone!
The BohrSommerfeld rule allows approximating the spectra of integrable
systems in a quite accurate way, at least for high quantum numbers.
The most general formulation of the rule is as follows (I converted a
less
highbrow formulation into this form, I hope I got it right):
We know the phasespace (X, omega) of an integrable system is foliated
by invariant Lagrangian tori (btw, does it mean the phasespace is a
locally trivial fibration with toric fiber? Or are there exceptional
fibers?)
Lets choose a U(1) bundle L and connection A over the phase space,
such that omega is the curvature of A (together with the Lagrangian
foliation we have for free, these comprise precisely the data for
geometric quantization!) Then, the restriction of A on any of the the
tori
is flat (since the tori are Lagrangian). However, some tori are
special:
the restriction on them is not only flat but trivial (all of the
monodromies
are trivial). These are the tori "selected" by the BohrSommerfeld
rule,
and the values of the Hamiltonian (and the other integrals of motion)
on
them form the predicted quantum spectrum.
The question is, has anyone shown the approximation to be "good", in
some sense, in a mathematically rigorous way? At least for the high
quantum number asymptotics?
Best regards,
Squark 

Back to top 


Pindare science forum beginner
Joined: 11 May 2005
Posts: 5

Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:41 pm Post subject:
Re: Mathematical Basis of BohrSommerfeld



Squark wrote:
Quote:  We know the phasespace (X, omega) of an integrable system is foliated
by invariant Lagrangian tori (btw, does it mean the phasespace is a
locally trivial fibration with toric fiber? Or are there exceptional
fibers?)

There can be singular fibers, in fact this is the case already in many
simple examples of integrable systems (see below).
Quote:  The question is, has anyone shown the approximation to be "good", in
some sense, in a mathematically rigorous way? At least for the high
quantum number asymptotics?

Yes this has been shown (e.g. section 5 of the second reference below).
The study of BohrSommerfeld rules in the case of integrable systems
with singularities has received a lot of attention recently from both
mathematicians and physicists, in relation to the idea of "quantum
monodromy" (basically the lattice formed by the quantum states is
usually not a simple periodic one and the quantum numbers are not
globally valid).
Here are three recent references which provide some background:
1. Singular BohrSommerfeld rules for 2D integrable systems
Yves Colin de Verdičre and San Vu Ngoc
Annales Scientifiques de l'École Normale Supérieure
Volume 36, Issue 1 , March 2003, Pages 155.
doi:10.1016/S00129593(03)000028
preprint: http://wwwfourier.ujfgrenoble.fr/~svungoc/articles/bs2d.pdf
2. Symplectic Techniques for Semiclassical Integrable Systems
San Vu Ngoc
2004
preprint:
http://wwwfourier.ujfgrenoble.fr/~svungoc/articles/stsis.pdf
3. Hamiltonian monodromy as lattice defect
B. I. Zhilinskií
in: Topology in Condensed Matter,
(Springer Series in SolidState Sciences, Vol. 150), 2006, pp. 165186.
preprint: http://pca3.univlittoral.fr/~zhilin/prepub/MLD.ps
Experimentalists are also starting to study the issue, see
4. Experimental Confirmation of Quantum Monodromy: The Millimeter Wave
Spectrum of Cyanogen Isothiocyanate NCNCS
B. P. Winnewisser at al.
Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 243002 (2005)
http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v95/e243002
Regards,

PP 

Back to top 


Google


Back to top 



The time now is Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:01 pm  All times are GMT

