FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics » Electromagnetics
GEDANKEN acceleration.
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [1 Post] View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
brian a m stuckless
science forum Guru


Joined: 31 Aug 2005
Posts: 2024

PostPosted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 9:23 am    Post subject: GEDANKEN acceleration. Reply with quote

$$ GEDANKEN acceleration a & g experimental analysis:

$$ 1. F_constant v^2 velocity v Dis-place
$$ Acceleration a = ---------- = --------- = ---------- = ---------.
$$ m1 dis-place (unit sec) (sec)^2
$$
$$ " " ..varies with mass m1; m1 iNCREASEs with velocity v.

$$ 2. F_variable v1^2 vbob^2 G*M1
$$ Acceleration g = ---------- = ---- = ------ = ------------ ..@rA.
$$ m1 rA lbob (n - 1)*rA^2
$$
$$ 4*(pi)^2*lbob 4*(pi)^2*rA RADiAL velocity Dis-place
$$ " " = ------------- = ----------- = --------------- = ---------.
$$ tbob^2 t1^2 (unit sec) (sec)^2
$$
$$ Acceleration g *doesN'T vary* with m1, the Force F_variable does.
$$ Acceleration g *doesN'T vary* with m1 ..it varies with v1 and rA.
$$ [Even though m1 also iNCREASEs with ANY velocity, as per gammma].

$$ Local CONSTANT Force F_constant = m1*a ; g_constant at radius rA.
$$ [This means ..as acceleration a varies, the TEST mass m1 varies].
$$ PROOF GRAViTATiON Force F_variable is NOT iNDEPENDENT of mass m1.
$$ This PROVEs GRAViTATiONAL acceleration g, iNDEPENDENT of mass m1.

Quote:
The answer is not the same for force and acceleration.
Forget the GMm/[n-1]*r^2 for a second.
Just consider a piano and a golf ball, both held 20 feet
above the ground. The force of gravitational attraction
between the Earth and the piano is a *whole lot* more than
the force of gravitational attraction between the Earth
and the golf ball. That much is unquestioned. (We call this
force of attraction near the surface of the earth "weight".)
But now release both the piano and the golf ball, and they
both accelerate towards the ground at *identical* rates. Now
how can the force be so much different, but the acceleration
be the same?

Re: There was TWO KiNDs of mass (if any), in GR; CENTRAL M1 & TEST m1.
Re: A CENTRAL mass M1 (if any in GR) had a "field" ..NOT TEST mass m1.
Re: [Mathematically speaking, there was NO "ANGULAR momentum", in GR].
Re: [PROFOUNDLY there was NO "SPACE-time-curvature" AFTER ALL, in GR].
Re: [NOTE there was NO G_uv or T_uv equated or equitable mass, in GR].

Re: Was HARD, for a GR World-POiNT-mass on a GR World-SPACE-time-line.
Re: Coup-GR DECLARED "No-PRiOR-Geometry", CUTTiNG it's own WORLD-line.

Re: GEDANKEN acceleration. End of POST.
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [1 Post] View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Tue Aug 22, 2017 9:22 am | All times are GMT
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics » Electromagnetics
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts The Ethics of Profiting from Foreknowledge (was: Earth ac... markwh04@yahoo.com Physics 1 Sun Jul 16, 2006 10:21 pm
No new posts Anomalous Acceleration Proves Gravity Anisotropy. Max Keon Relativity 17 Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:40 am
No new posts Acceleration Of Photons? symphony Relativity 0 Fri Jun 16, 2006 8:40 pm
No new posts Acceleration Anomaly NovaWatcher New Theories 1 Sun May 21, 2006 3:23 am
No new posts Cosmic acceleration (from back-reaction) melroysoares@hotmail.com1 Research 6 Wed May 17, 2006 10:28 am

Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Electronics forum |  Medicine forum |  Unix/Linux blog |  Unix/Linux documentation |  Unix/Linux forums  |  send newsletters
 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.0199s ][ Queries: 16 (0.0038s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]