brian a m stuckless science forum Guru
Joined: 31 Aug 2005
Posts: 2024

Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 9:23 am Post subject:
GEDANKEN acceleration.



$$ GEDANKEN acceleration a & g experimental analysis:
$$ 1. F_constant v^2 velocity v Displace
$$ Acceleration a =  =  =  = .
$$ m1 displace (unit sec) (sec)^2
$$
$$ " " ..varies with mass m1; m1 iNCREASEs with velocity v.
$$ 2. F_variable v1^2 vbob^2 G*M1
$$ Acceleration g =  =  =  =  ..@rA.
$$ m1 rA lbob (n  1)*rA^2
$$
$$ 4*(pi)^2*lbob 4*(pi)^2*rA RADiAL velocity Displace
$$ " " =  =  =  = .
$$ tbob^2 t1^2 (unit sec) (sec)^2
$$
$$ Acceleration g *doesN'T vary* with m1, the Force F_variable does.
$$ Acceleration g *doesN'T vary* with m1 ..it varies with v1 and rA.
$$ [Even though m1 also iNCREASEs with ANY velocity, as per gammma].
$$ Local CONSTANT Force F_constant = m1*a ; g_constant at radius rA.
$$ [This means ..as acceleration a varies, the TEST mass m1 varies].
$$ PROOF GRAViTATiON Force F_variable is NOT iNDEPENDENT of mass m1.
$$ This PROVEs GRAViTATiONAL acceleration g, iNDEPENDENT of mass m1.
Quote:  The answer is not the same for force and acceleration.
Forget the GMm/[n1]*r^2 for a second.
Just consider a piano and a golf ball, both held 20 feet
above the ground. The force of gravitational attraction
between the Earth and the piano is a *whole lot* more than
the force of gravitational attraction between the Earth
and the golf ball. That much is unquestioned. (We call this
force of attraction near the surface of the earth "weight".)
But now release both the piano and the golf ball, and they
both accelerate towards the ground at *identical* rates. Now
how can the force be so much different, but the acceleration
be the same?

Re: There was TWO KiNDs of mass (if any), in GR; CENTRAL M1 & TEST m1.
Re: A CENTRAL mass M1 (if any in GR) had a "field" ..NOT TEST mass m1.
Re: [Mathematically speaking, there was NO "ANGULAR momentum", in GR].
Re: [PROFOUNDLY there was NO "SPACEtimecurvature" AFTER ALL, in GR].
Re: [NOTE there was NO G_uv or T_uv equated or equitable mass, in GR].
Re: Was HARD, for a GR WorldPOiNTmass on a GR WorldSPACEtimeline.
Re: CoupGR DECLARED "NoPRiORGeometry", CUTTiNG it's own WORLDline.
Re: GEDANKEN acceleration. End of POST. 
