FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » Science and Technology » Math
Jungian Archetypes in Post-Quantum Psychotronics
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [1 Post] View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Jack Sarfatti
science forum Guru

Joined: 29 Apr 2005
Posts: 487

PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 4:40 am    Post subject: Jungian Archetypes in Post-Quantum Psychotronics Reply with quote

We are such dreams that stuff is made from.

On Jul 17, 2006, at 8:49 PM, D Ivanovich wrote:


"Sounds like the reality of archetypes incarnates only
upon experience by a willing or even unwitting host."

Listen to the last half of



--- KenJenkins@aol.com wrote:

In a message dated 7/16/06 4:05:01 AM,
pantheon@ix.netcom.com writes:

"Anyway, archetypes are not physical, neither space nor time nor energy
nor matter nor motion is involved."

Archetypes are invariants of finite groups of morphings. There is a
relation of finite groups to continuous groups Saul-Paul Sirag is
interested in.

"I agree.

"But if they can be experienced, then in Jack's words, they are physical


"So, what is a true meaning of physicality?"

Anything that happens is physical. Anything that might happen is
physical. Anything that is not forbidden is physical. Not all physical
phenomena are "material", i.e. are Bohm's "hidden variables" - they can
be mental thought pilot waves that influence the motion of matter.
Gravity also influences the motion of matter, but there is a big
difference between gravity and mind. Gravity is a material field, a
geometrodynamic field not unlike the electron field and other matter
fields. All matter fields are driven by thought fields. When the matter
fields directly back-react on their pilot thought qubit fields then they
excite presponse inner conscious experiences or qualia in those thought
pilot fields with signal nonlocality, i.e. retro-causal spooky
telepathic action at a distance violating the no-cloning theorem of
orthodox quantum theory. This is a more general quantum theory like
general relativity is to special relativity.

"That's a big, multidimensional question."

"So how about this way around: something like an archetype BECOMES also
physical (by Jack's definition) only when it is experienced. This idea is
related to the observer phenonmenon, and to the concept of "collapsing".

Back to top

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [1 Post] View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Sat Mar 23, 2019 10:32 am | All times are GMT
Forum index » Science and Technology » Math
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts Comments on a post to FOM Ross A. Finlayson Math 0 Thu Jul 20, 2006 5:40 am
No new posts Signal Nonlocality Loophole in Quantum Theory? Jack Sarfatti Math 0 Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:59 am
No new posts TURMEL: Parker's Canada Post Pot seizure Pre-trial John Turmel Engineering 1 Tue Jul 18, 2006 11:18 am
No new posts A Look at Quantum "Spookiness" Egap Strings 0 Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:52 am
No new posts "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity" Moc Relativity 0 Sat Jul 08, 2006 7:39 pm

Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Electronics forum |  Medicine forum |  Unix/Linux blog |  Unix/Linux documentation |  Unix/Linux forums  |  send newsletters

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.0119s ][ Queries: 16 (0.0024s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]