science forum Guru
Joined: 29 Apr 2005
|Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 4:40 am Post subject:
Jungian Archetypes in Post-Quantum Psychotronics
We are such dreams that stuff is made from.
IT FROM BIT
On Jul 17, 2006, at 8:49 PM, D Ivanovich wrote:
"Sounds like the reality of archetypes incarnates only
upon experience by a willing or even unwitting host."
Listen to the last half of
--- KenJenkins@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 7/16/06 4:05:01 AM,
"Anyway, archetypes are not physical, neither space nor time nor energy
nor matter nor motion is involved."
Archetypes are invariants of finite groups of morphings. There is a
relation of finite groups to continuous groups Saul-Paul Sirag is
"But if they can be experienced, then in Jack's words, they are physical
"So, what is a true meaning of physicality?"
Anything that happens is physical. Anything that might happen is
physical. Anything that is not forbidden is physical. Not all physical
phenomena are "material", i.e. are Bohm's "hidden variables" - they can
be mental thought pilot waves that influence the motion of matter.
Gravity also influences the motion of matter, but there is a big
difference between gravity and mind. Gravity is a material field, a
geometrodynamic field not unlike the electron field and other matter
fields. All matter fields are driven by thought fields. When the matter
fields directly back-react on their pilot thought qubit fields then they
excite presponse inner conscious experiences or qualia in those thought
pilot fields with signal nonlocality, i.e. retro-causal spooky
telepathic action at a distance violating the no-cloning theorem of
orthodox quantum theory. This is a more general quantum theory like
general relativity is to special relativity.
"That's a big, multidimensional question."
"So how about this way around: something like an archetype BECOMES also
physical (by Jack's definition) only when it is experienced. This idea is
related to the observer phenonmenon, and to the concept of "collapsing".