FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » Science and Technology » Math
Tied Up & Strung Out: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For Extras!!! KAKU, GREENE, WITTEN, DUCHOVNEY, BURT REYNOLDS, JESSICA ALBA
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [8 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
jollyrogership@yahoo.com1
science forum beginner


Joined: 27 Oct 2005
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 4:53 pm    Post subject: Tied Up & Strung Out: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For Extras!!! KAKU, GREENE, WITTEN, DUCHOVNEY, BURT REYNOLDS, JESSICA ALBA Reply with quote

http://www.physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=56

Tied Up & Strung Out: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For
Extras!!!
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

ALL TIED UP & STRUNG ALONG, a movie about String Theorists and their
expansive theories which extend human ignorance, pomposity, and frailty
into higher dimensions, is set to start filming this fall. Jessica
Alba, John Cleese, Eugene Levie, Jackie Chan, and David Duchovney of
X-files fame have all signed on to the $700 million Hollywood project,
which is still cheaper than String Theory itself, and will likely
displace less physicists from the academy.



"As contemporary physics is about money, hype, mythology, and chicks,"
Ed Witten explained from his offices at the Princeton Institute for
Advanced Study, "The next logical step was Hollywood, although I
thought Burt Reynolds should play me instead of Eugene Levy."



Brian Greene, the famous String Theorist who will be played by David
"the truth is out there" Duchovney, explained the plot: "String
theory's muddled, contorted theories that lack postulates, laws, and
experimentally-verified equations have Einstein spinning so fast in his
grave that it creates a black hole. In order to save the world, we
String Theorists have to stop reformulating String Theory faster than
the speed of light. We are called upon to stop violating the
conservation of energy by mining higher dimensions to publish more BS
than can accounted for with the Big Bang alone, and I win the Nobel
prize for showing that M-Theory is in fact the dark matter it has been
searching for."


Greene continues: "At first my character is reluctant to stop
theorizing and start postulating, but when my love interest Jessica
Alba is sucked into the black hole, I search my soul and find Paul
Davies there, played by John Cleese. I ask him what he's doing in my
soul, and he explains that the answer is contained in the mind of God,
which only he is privy too, but for a small fee, some tax and tuition
dollars, a couple grants here and there, and an all-expense-paid book
tour with stops in Zurich and Honolulu, he can let me in on it. And he
shows me God in all her greater glory, as he points out that we can
make more money in Hollywood than writing coffee-table books that
recycle Einstein, Bohr, Dirac, Feynman, and Wheeler. I am quickly
converted, and I agree to turn my back on String Theory's hoax and save
Jessica Alba."


But it's not that easy, as standing in Greene's way is Michio "king of
pop-theory-hipster-irony-the-theory-of-everything-or-anything-made-
you-read-this" Kaku, played by Jackie Chan. Kaku beats the crap out of
Greene for alomst blowing the "ironic" pretense his salary, benefits,
and all-expense paid trips depend on. "WE MUST HOLD BACK THE YOUNG
SCIENTISTS WITH OUR NON-THEORIES!! WE MUST FILL THE ACADEMY WITH THE
POMO DARK MATTER THAT IS STRING THEORY TO KEEP OUR UNIVERSE FROM FLYING
APART, OUR PYRAMID SCHEMES FROM TOPPLING, AND OUR PERPETUAL-MOTION NSF
MONEY MACHINE FROM STOPPING!!" Kaku argues as he delivers a flying
back-kick, "There can be ony ONE! I WILL be String Theory's GODFATHER
as referenced on my web page!! I have better hair!"

But Greene fights back as he signs his seventeenth book deal to make
the hand-waving incoherence of String Theory accessible to the South
Park generation, senior citizens, and starving chirldren around the
world. "Kaku! Kaku! (pronounced Ka-Kaw! Ka-Kaw! like Owen Wilson did in
Bottle Rocket)," Greene shouts. "It is theoretically impossible to
build a coffee tables strong enough to support any more coffee-table
physics books!!!"

"Time travel is also theoretically impossible, but there's a helluva
lot more money for us in flushing physics down a wormhole. Nobody knows
what the #&#%&$ M stands for in M theory ya hand-waving, TV-hogging
crank!!! Get it?? Ha Ha Ha! We're laughing at the public! We're the
insider pomo hipsters! Get with the gangsta-wanksta-pranksta CRANKSTER
bling-bling program!!"


How does it all end? Does physics go bankrupt funding theories that
have expanded our ignorance from four dimensions into ten, twenty, and
thirty dimensions? Do tax payers revolt? Do young physicists overthrow
the hand-waving, contortionist bullies and revive physics with a
classical renaissance favoring logic, reason, and Truth over
meaningless mathematical abstractions? Does Moving Dimensions Theory
(MDT) prevail with its simple postulate? We'll all just have to wait!

But in the meantime, how do you think it will play out?

Will theories with postulates ever be allowed in physics again? Or will
the well-funded, tenured pomo String Theory / M-Theory (Maffia-Theory)
Priests send their armies of desperate, snarky postdocs and starving
graduate students forth to displace and destroy all common sense,
logic, reason, and physics in the academy? It must be so--for the
greater good of physics, the individual physicist, and thus physics,
must be sacrificed.

MDT's postulate: THE FOURTH DIMENSION IS EXPANDING AT A RATE OF C
RELATIVE TO THE THREE SPATIAL DIMENSIONS IN QUANTIZED UNITS OF THE
PLANCK LENGTH, GIVING RISE TO TIME AND ALL CLASSICAL, QUANTUM
MECHANICAL, AND RELATIVISTIC PHENOMENA.

http://www.physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=56
http://www.physicsmathforums.com
Back to top
James Waldby
science forum Guru Wannabe


Joined: 01 May 2005
Posts: 114

PostPosted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 6:41 pm    Post subject: Re: Tied Up & Strung Out: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For Extras!!! KAKU, GREENE, WITTEN, DUCHOVNEY, BURT REYNOLDS, JESSICA ALBA Reply with quote

jollyrogership@yahoo.com wrote:
[snip made-up stuff]
Quote:
But it's not that easy, as standing in Greene's way is Michio "king of
pop-theory-hipster-irony-the-theory-of-everything-or-anything-made-
you-read-this" Kaku, played by Jackie Chan. Kaku beats the crap out of
Greene for alomst blowing the "ironic" pretense his salary, benefits,
and all-expense paid trips depend on. "WE MUST HOLD BACK THE YOUNG
SCIENTISTS WITH OUR NON-THEORIES!! WE MUST FILL THE ACADEMY WITH THE
POMO DARK MATTER THAT IS STRING THEORY TO KEEP OUR UNIVERSE FROM FLYING
APART, OUR PYRAMID SCHEMES FROM TOPPLING, AND OUR PERPETUAL-MOTION NSF
MONEY MACHINE FROM STOPPING!!" Kaku argues
[more snip of made-up stuff]


The above paragraph plainly gives away the fact that you made this
all up, rather than telling the truth. Jackie Chan only plays good
guys.

-jiw
Back to top
Bill Hobba
science forum Guru


Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 2138

PostPosted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 1:21 am    Post subject: Re: Tied Up & Strung Out: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For Extras!!! KAKU, GREENE, WITTEN, DUCHOVNEY, BURT REYNOLDS, JESSICA ALBA Reply with quote

<jollyrogership@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1152982411.430229.92100@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
http://www.physicsmathforums.com/showthread.php?t=56

Tied Up & Strung Out: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For
Extras!!!
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Wrong - you should be kept in the asylum indefinitely.

Rest of junk that has been posted innumerable time snipped

Bill
Back to top
Bill Hobba
science forum Guru


Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 2138

PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 12:44 am    Post subject: Re: Tied Up & Strung Out: Hollywood String Theory Movie!!! Looking For Extras!!! KAKU, GREENE, WITTEN, DUCHOVNEY, BURT REYNOLDS, JESSICA ALBA Reply with quote

<drelliot@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1153068723.350366.234580@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
http://physicsmathforums.com

Quote:
Moving Dimensions Theory accounts for and unifies general relativity
and quantum mechanics by postulating that the fourth dimension is
expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions in units of the
Planck length at the rate of c.

All it accounts for is the fact you are an imbecile who does not even know
what movement is.

Bill
Back to top
T Wake
science forum Guru


Joined: 08 May 2005
Posts: 1978

PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 3:15 pm    Post subject: Re: Roger's Gangsta_Wanksta_Pranksta_Cranksta_Fling_Fling postulate. Reply with quote

"Jeff.Relf" <Jeff_Relf@Yahoo.COM> wrote in message
news:Jeff_Relf_2006_Jul_16_Otlj@Cotse.NET...
Quote:
Hi Jolly_Roger_Shit,

Hi Reff===Jelf,

I see you cant help but produce more word salad as soon as some one mentions
dimensions. Do you know Dr Pavlov?

Quote:
Re: Your Gangsta_Wanksta_Pranksta_Cranksta_Fling_Fling postulate, You
wrote:

tHE fOURTH sPATIAL dIMENSION iS eXPANDING aT a rATE oF c
rELATIVE tO tHE tHREE cOULOMB dIMENSIONS
iN qUANTIZED uNITS oF tHE pLANCK lENGTH;
gIVING rISE tO tIME aND aLL cLASSICAL, qUANTUM mECHANICAL, aND
rELATIVISTIC pHENOMENA.

Planck what ? Like a dice toss is known to be pseudorandom ( i.e.
causal ),
time is psuedo-directional ( i.e. spatial )
because all randomness is pseudorandom.

What has your generic randomness quote got to do with the text you have
replied to?

Quote:
String theory is unphysical and takes its inspiration from corny sci-fi.
A spatial dimension _must_ be demarcated as a length ( e.g. SI meters ),
either directly or by some reasonable conversion, like c * t.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahah.

Try again sonny.

Remember to study the gravitational force, strong force, propogation of em
over distance etc. It will give you an idea of what are (and arent) spatial
dimensions.

Quote:
String theory isn't good enough to be declared _Wrong_ !

Yet it is still better than any of your theories.

Quote:
First, it ingores the fact that time is truly spatial.

Bzzt. Wrong. Try again.

Quote:
Second, it's fifth dimension is the collapse of the wave function,
which can only happen when a fully tenured Ph.D. observes it... ha ha.

Lack of knowledge noted.

Repeating pathetic joke for the nth time noted.

You lose 10 marks for this Jeff. Try harder next time.

Quote:
It claims an unobserved universe simply doesn't exist,
something ( e.g. a gun ) hidden in a box doesn't exist,
even if you happen to remember putting it ( the gun ) there.

You are aware this is not string theory per se aren't you?

Quote:
People love this ( wholely unphysical ) " model ", but I won't be joining
them.

Because you dont understand ti.

Quote:
By conversions, there are at least 5 _Spatial_ dimensions...

"At least" now. Things *are* changing in the Land Of Relf.

Still, as you have no idea what a spatial dimension is, you can have as many
Relfial dimensions as you want.

Quote:
Zooming out, a photon observed today from the birth of the CMB
underwent X oscillations... which, by conversions
( c * t, Pressure_Cosmos = - ( .74 / .26 ) * Density_Matter * c^2 ),
represents a length, a duration, and a pressure field ( i.e. a mass ),
...Pressure_Time_Space: 5 _Spatial_ dimensions.

Bzzt. Wrong again. Lose another 10 points.

Quote:
Zooming in, the SI meter, second and kilogram
can each be defined as oscillation counts.

What madness your planet must be.

Quote:
Sans zooming, my directional ( WiFi ) antenna ( for example )

"Sans zooming" - hahahahaha

Brilliance.

Quote:
has an infinite number of orientations at any given X,Y,Z,T;
so, there's no limit to the number of unique films ( i.e. time slices )
that can be recorded at a given X,Y,Z.
Each orientation is a point in a pseudo-random pressure field.

Gibberish.

Quote:
A pseudo-singularity, such as the start of the Big Bang
( before the now-visible universe was Planck density )
or at the center of an _Ideal_ black hole has these features:

* the SI second ( i.e. X oscillations of a certain cesium maser )
takes an eternity, so no time passes.

* the SI meter is infinitely wide, so no volume exists.

* the SI kilogram is infinitely weak
( i.e. the radiation pressure, which defines it, is fully dissipated )
so infinite mass exists.

So it's _Static_ and infinitely dense,
...both to us ( indirectly viewing it ) _And_ at the pseudo-singularity.
Cosmically, Planck density induces _Huge_ negavite pressure, _Rapid_
cooling.
i.e. a white hole ( ¿ are black holes really white holes ? ), because:

Given dark energy is uniform and has negative pressure, e = m * c^2,
Omega_Total always equals 1, Omega_Lambda always equals .74,
and w always equals -1 ( all in agreement with Lambda_CDM, I assume ),
we get:

Pressure_Cosmos always equals: - ( .74 / .26 ) * Density_Matter * c^2
( the positive pressure of radiation is insignificant ).
www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/W.PNG

Cosmically, the geometry of spacetime ( 4D ) is ever-flat ( euclidian )
with no center of gravity; but just as you can define the SI kilogram
using X oscillations of a maser
( or atom laser, by conversion from radiation pressure )
pressure is a 5th _Spatial_ dimension, demarcatable ( by conversions )
in SI meters, SI seconds, pascals, Kelvin, and/or entropy.
The units of entropy are Joules per Kelvin, but only the Kelvin
changes;
so the entropy goes up as the temperature of the universe drops.
Think of entropy as a measure of how dissipated ( consumed ) something is.
The sixth spatial dimension is probably Coulombs.

Hahahahahahahhahahaha

New levels of nonsense spewed forth by the RelfBot.
Back to top
drelliot@gmail.com
science forum beginner


Joined: 28 Nov 2005
Posts: 34

PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:17 pm    Post subject: Re: MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY : Roger's Gangsta_Wanksta_Pranksta_Cranksta_Fling_Fling postulate. Reply with quote

But it's not that easy, as standing in Greene's way is Michio "king of
pop-theory-hipster-irony-the-theory-of-everything-or-anything-made-
you-read-this" Kaku, played by Jackie Chan. Kaku beats the crap out of
Greene for alomst blowing the "ironic" pretense his salary, benefits,
and all-expense paid trips depend on. "WE MUST HOLD BACK THE YOUNG
SCIENTISTS WITH OUR NON-THEORIES!! WE MUST FILL THE ACADEMY WITH THE
POMO DARK MATTER THAT IS STRING THEORY TO KEEP OUR UNIVERSE FROM FLYING
APART, OUR PYRAMID SCHEMES FROM TOPPLING, AND OUR PERPETUAL-MOTION NSF
MONEY MACHINE FROM STOPPING!!" Kaku argues as he delivers a flying
back-kick, "There can be ony ONE! I WILL be String Theory's GODFATHER
as referenced on my web page!! I have better hair!"

http://physicsmathforums.com

Moving Dimensions Theory accounts for and unifies general relativity
and quantum mechanics by postulating that the fourth dimension is
expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions in units of the
Planck length at the rate of c.

In his autobiography Einstein said:

Before I enter upon a critique of mechanics as a foundation of
physics, something of a broadly general nature will first have to be
said concerning the points of view according to which it is possible to
criticize physical theories at all. The first point of view is obvious:
The theory must not contradict empirical facts. However evident this
demand may in the first place appear, its application turns out to be
quite delicate. For it is often, perhaps even always, possible to
adhere to a general theoretical foundation by securing the adaption of
the theory to the facts by means of artificial additional assumptions.
In any case, however, this first point of view is concerned with the
confirmation of the theoretical foundation by the available empirical
facts.
The second point of view is not concerned with the relation to
the material of observation but with the premises of the theory itself,
with what may briefly but vaguely be characterized as the "naturalness"
or " logical simplicity" of the premises (of the basic concepts and of
the relations between these which are taken as a basis). This point of
view, an exact formulation of which meets with great difficulties, has
played an important role in the selection and evaluation of theories
since time immemorial. The problem here is not simply one of a kind of
enumeration of the logically independent premises (if anything like
this were at all unequivocally possible), but that of a kind of
reciprocal weighing of incommeasurable qualities. Furthermore, among
theories of equally "simple" foundation that one is to be taken as
superior which most sharply delimits the qualities of system in the
abstract (i.e., contains that most definite claims). Of the "realm" of
theories I need not speak here, inasmuch as we are confining ourselves
to such theories whose object is the totality of all physical
appearances. The second point of view may briefly be characterized as
concerning itself with the "inner perfection" of the theory, whereas
the first point of view refers to the "external confirmation." The
following I reckon as also belonging to the "inner perfection" of a
theory: we prize a theory more highly if, from the logical standpoint,
it is not the result of an arbitrary choice among theories which, among
themselves, are of equal value and analogously constructed.
Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, Volume One,
1949, Autobiographical Notes, p 21--23,
Open Court, Cambridge University Press.

MDT's simple postulate:

MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY
ABSTRACT
Moving Dimensions Theory accounts for and unifies general relativity
and quantum mechanics by postulating that the fourth dimension is
expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions in units of the
Planck length at the rate of c. In addition to providing a deeper
framework for the two theories, MDT offers an underlying context
accounting for quantum mechanical, relativistic, and classical physics.
Phenomena including wave-particle duality, interference phenomena, the
spherical symmetry of photon propagation, action at a distance, the
uncertainty principle, the gravitational redshift, time dilation,
Lorentzian contraction, time's arrow, the equivalence of mass and
energy, and time itself are accounted for within this deeper framework.
The above physical phenomena and many more, spanning quantum mechanics
and relativity, can be seen as arising from MDT's postulate. Time is
not the fourth dimension, but a phenomena that emerges because the
fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions,
resolving Godel's block universe paradox and Zeno's paradox.
..

1. The First Postulate of Moving Dimensions Theory
MDT's General Postulate: The fourth dimension is expanding relative
to the three spatial dimensions.

MDT's Specific Postulate: The fourth dimension is expanding relative
to the three spatial dimensions in units of the Planck length at the
rate of c.

2. It's As Simple As a Photon's Spherically Symmetric Wavefront
A photon propagates at the velocity c as a sphereically-symmetric
wavefron. The spherical symmetry of the photon's wavefront may be
viewed as the result of matter (momenergy) having been rotated into the
fourth dimension-the matter has become orthogonal to the spatial
dimensions, and it is now expanding along with the fourth dimension,
equally in all directions. Thus we may conclude that the fourth
dimension is expanding equally in all directions as a spherically
symmetric manner wherever space-time is flat. In regions of curved
space-time, the fourth dimension expands in a manner dictated by the
local curvature. Thus a photon emitted from the sun will appear
stretched, or red-shifted, when it is observed far away from the sun.

3. All Objects Travel Through Space-Time With The Velocity c

Einstein noted that all objects travel through space-time with the
velocity c.

This never changes.

This fact underlies the conservation principles.

And underlying the conservation principles is the fact that the fourth
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions.

Even though we perceive a ruler along the x axis to be stationary, it
is yet traveling through space-time at the fixed speed of c, implying
that time is moving through it. Rotate the ruler towards the y axis,
and its projection upon the x axis shortens, yet it still appears to be
stationary, and it is still traveling through space-time at the rate of
c.

Rotate the ruler into the fourth dimension, known as the time
dimeension, and its projection along the x axis shortens, according to
relativity and the Lorentz contraction. The ruler begins to propagate
through the three spatial dimensions, while maintaining the fixed speed
of c through space-time. The ruler moves through the three spatial
dimensions as it is rotated into the time dimension because the time
dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions.

4. Brian Green & Einstein Support MDT
As Brian Greene points out in the Appendix to Chapter 2 of The Elegant
Universe, "we note that from the space-time position 4-vector
x=(ct,x1,x2,x3), we can create the velocity 4-vector u=dx/d(tau), where
tau is the proper time defined by
d(tau)^2=dt^2-c^-2(dx1^2+dx2^2+dx3^2). Then the "speed through
space-time" is the magnitude of the 4-vector u,
((c^2dt^2-dx^2)/(dt^2-c^-2dx^2))^(1/2), which is identically the speed
of light c. Now, we can rearrange the equation
c^2(dt/d(tau))^2-(dx/d(tau))^2=c^2 to be c^2(d(tau)/dt))^2
+(dx/d(tau))^2=c^2. This shows that an increase of an object's speed
through space, (dx/d(tau))^2)^(1/2)= dx/d(tau) must be accompanied by a
decrease in d(tau)/dt which is the object's speed through time, which
also may be considered the rate at which time elapses on it's own clock
d(tau) or the proper time, as compared with that on our stationary
clock dt."

5. Surfing A Wave Analogy : The Birth of Moving Dimensions Theory
Here's a good analogy of "surfing a wave" that sheds light on Moving
Dimensions Theory.

A few years back, while surfing a towering wave on the Outer Banks
ofNorthCarolina, a beautiful thought occurred to me. Suppose the wave I
was riding represented a coordinate in a dimension. Then although I was
approaching shore, I was not moving in this dimension. The dimension
itself was moving--I was stationary with respect to this dimension, but
moving relative to other dimensions. I was "surfing" a moving
dimension.

The General Postulate of Moving Dimensions Theory: The fourth dimension
is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions.

In a flash I saw that that is why photons never age--they are moving
along with the fourth dimension, and thus stationary relative to the
fourth dimension, while moving at the velocity of light relative to the
three spatial dimensions.

And behold! I saw that "moving dimensions" explained the equivalence of
mass and energy. E=mc^2 arose because whenever matter "surfs"
theexpanding time dimension, it appears as energy in the three
spatialdimensions.In another flash I saw that that is why a photon's
space-time interval is represented by a null vector, or a 0, no matter
how far it travelsthroughspace.

Indeed, in his special theory of relativity, Einstein stated that an
object's velocity through space-time is always c. This means that even
objects stationary in the three spatial dimensions yet have a velocity
c through the fourth dimension. How could this be unless the fourth
dimension is moving relative to the three spatial dimensions? Even
"stationary" objects sitting on your desk are traveling at the velocity
c through time! How could this be were it not that the fourth dimension
is traveling at the velocity c relative to the object that is
stationary in the three spatial dimensions? Thus there exists a fourth
expanding dimension, which matter can surf as photons, giving rise to
our notion of time, as well as the equivalence of mass and energy in
E=mc^2. And so it is that Moving Dimensions Theory was born as the
wave crested and crashed about me, thundering on down, as I fought to
remain surfing amidst the foam, facing the setting sun silhouetting the
Hatteras light.

6. What Does It Mean For A Dimension to Move?
Einstein's well-regarded theory of General Relativity inherently
necessitates the reality of moving dimensions. And yet some trained
physicists have a knee-jerk reaction that the fourth dimension cannot
be moving because "dimensions cannot move." But dimensions can and do
move relative to one-another. First off, since the universe is
expanding, space-time is alsoexpanding, demonstrating that dimensions
are moving and ...

http://physicsmathforums.com

T Wake wrote:
Quote:
"Jeff.Relf" <Jeff_Relf@Yahoo.COM> wrote in message
news:Jeff_Relf_2006_Jul_16_Otlj@Cotse.NET...
Hi Jolly_Roger_Shit,

Hi Reff===Jelf,

I see you cant help but produce more word salad as soon as some one mentions
dimensions. Do you know Dr Pavlov?

Re: Your Gangsta_Wanksta_Pranksta_Cranksta_Fling_Fling postulate, You
wrote:

tHE fOURTH sPATIAL dIMENSION iS eXPANDING aT a rATE oF c
rELATIVE tO tHE tHREE cOULOMB dIMENSIONS
iN qUANTIZED uNITS oF tHE pLANCK lENGTH;
gIVING rISE tO tIME aND aLL cLASSICAL, qUANTUM mECHANICAL, aND
rELATIVISTIC pHENOMENA.

Planck what ? Like a dice toss is known to be pseudorandom ( i.e.
causal ),
time is psuedo-directional ( i.e. spatial )
because all randomness is pseudorandom.

What has your generic randomness quote got to do with the text you have
replied to?

String theory is unphysical and takes its inspiration from corny sci-fi.
A spatial dimension _must_ be demarcated as a length ( e.g. SI meters ),
either directly or by some reasonable conversion, like c * t.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahah.

Try again sonny.

Remember to study the gravitational force, strong force, propogation of em
over distance etc. It will give you an idea of what are (and arent) spatial
dimensions.

String theory isn't good enough to be declared _Wrong_ !

Yet it is still better than any of your theories.

First, it ingores the fact that time is truly spatial.

Bzzt. Wrong. Try again.

Second, it's fifth dimension is the collapse of the wave function,
which can only happen when a fully tenured Ph.D. observes it... ha ha.

Lack of knowledge noted.

Repeating pathetic joke for the nth time noted.

You lose 10 marks for this Jeff. Try harder next time.

It claims an unobserved universe simply doesn't exist,
something ( e.g. a gun ) hidden in a box doesn't exist,
even if you happen to remember putting it ( the gun ) there.

You are aware this is not string theory per se aren't you?

People love this ( wholely unphysical ) " model ", but I won't be joining
them.

Because you dont understand ti.

By conversions, there are at least 5 _Spatial_ dimensions...

"At least" now. Things *are* changing in the Land Of Relf.

Still, as you have no idea what a spatial dimension is, you can have as many
Relfial dimensions as you want.

Zooming out, a photon observed today from the birth of the CMB
underwent X oscillations... which, by conversions
( c * t, Pressure_Cosmos = - ( .74 / .26 ) * Density_Matter * c^2 ),
represents a length, a duration, and a pressure field ( i.e. a mass ),
...Pressure_Time_Space: 5 _Spatial_ dimensions.

Bzzt. Wrong again. Lose another 10 points.

Zooming in, the SI meter, second and kilogram
can each be defined as oscillation counts.

What madness your planet must be.

Sans zooming, my directional ( WiFi ) antenna ( for example )

"Sans zooming" - hahahahaha

Brilliance.

has an infinite number of orientations at any given X,Y,Z,T;
so, there's no limit to the number of unique films ( i.e. time slices )
that can be recorded at a given X,Y,Z.
Each orientation is a point in a pseudo-random pressure field.

Gibberish.

A pseudo-singularity, such as the start of the Big Bang
( before the now-visible universe was Planck density )
or at the center of an _Ideal_ black hole has these features:

* the SI second ( i.e. X oscillations of a certain cesium maser )
takes an eternity, so no time passes.

* the SI meter is infinitely wide, so no volume exists.

* the SI kilogram is infinitely weak
( i.e. the radiation pressure, which defines it, is fully dissipated )
so infinite mass exists.

So it's _Static_ and infinitely dense,
...both to us ( indirectly viewing it ) _And_ at the pseudo-singularity.
Cosmically, Planck density induces _Huge_ negavite pressure, _Rapid_
cooling.
i.e. a white hole ( ¿ are black holes really white holes ? ), because:

Given dark energy is uniform and has negative pressure, e = m * c^2,
Omega_Total always equals 1, Omega_Lambda always equals .74,
and w always equals -1 ( all in agreement with Lambda_CDM, I assume ),
we get:

Pressure_Cosmos always equals: - ( .74 / .26 ) * Density_Matter * c^2
( the positive pressure of radiation is insignificant ).
www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/W.PNG

Cosmically, the geometry of spacetime ( 4D ) is ever-flat ( euclidian )
with no center of gravity; but just as you can define the SI kilogram
using X oscillations of a maser
( or atom laser, by conversion from radiation pressure )
pressure is a 5th _Spatial_ dimension, demarcatable ( by conversions )
in SI meters, SI seconds, pascals, Kelvin, and/or entropy.
The units of entropy are Joules per Kelvin, but only the Kelvin
changes;
so the entropy goes up as the temperature of the universe drops.
Think of entropy as a measure of how dissipated ( consumed ) something is.
The sixth spatial dimension is probably Coulombs.

Hahahahahahahhahahaha

New levels of nonsense spewed forth by the RelfBot.
Back to top
T Wake
science forum Guru


Joined: 08 May 2005
Posts: 1978

PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 8:25 pm    Post subject: Re: MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY : Roger's Gangsta_Wanksta_Pranksta_Cranksta_Fling_Fling postulate. Reply with quote

<drelliot@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1153163821.782548.169990@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
But it's not that easy, as standing in Greene's way is Michio "king of

Sorry, I lost interest when I couldn't work out what post you were replying
to. Top posting has that effect on me.
Back to top
Phineas T Puddleduck
science forum Guru


Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Posts: 759

PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 12:22 pm    Post subject: Re: Roger's Gangsta_Wanksta_Pranksta_Cranksta_Fling_Fling postulate. Reply with quote

In article <Jeff_Relf_2006_Jul_16_Otlj@Cotse.NET>, Jeff’ĶRelf
<Jeff_Relf@Yahoo.COM> wrote:

Quote:
Hi Jolly_Roger_Shit,
Re: Your Gangsta_Wanksta_Pranksta_Cranksta_Fling_Fling postulate, You wrote:

tHE fOURTH sPATIAL dIMENSION iS eXPANDING aT a rATE oF c
rELATIVE tO tHE tHREE cOULOMB dIMENSIONS
iN qUANTIZED uNITS oF tHE pLANCK lENGTH;
gIVING rISE tO tIME aND aLL cLASSICAL, qUANTUM mECHANICAL, aND
rELATIVISTIC pHENOMENA.

Planck what ? Like a dice toss is known to be pseudorandom ( i.e. causal ),
time is psuedo-directional ( i.e. spatial )
because all randomness is pseudorandom.

String theory is unphysical and takes its inspiration from corny sci-fi.
A spatial dimension _must_ be demarcated as a length ( e.g. SI meters ),
either directly or by some reasonable conversion, like c * t.
String theory isn't good enough to be declared _Wrong_ !
First, it ingores the fact that time is truly spatial.
Second, it's fifth dimension is the collapse of the wave function,
which can only happen when a fully tenured Ph.D. observes it... ha ha.
It claims an unobserved universe simply doesn't exist,
something ( e.g. a gun ) hidden in a box doesn't exist,
even if you happen to remember putting it ( the gun ) there.
People love this ( wholely unphysical ) " model ", but I won't be joining them.


Looks like two kooks in love....

--
Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bullshit repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
Corollary -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
³It approaches the asymptote faster, the more Œpseduos¹ you throw in
your formulas.²
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
³Gravity is one of the four fundamental interactions. The classical
theory of gravity - Einstein's general relativity - is the subject
of this book.² : Hartle/ Gravity pg 1
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orange jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson
why parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [8 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Fri Oct 19, 2018 8:50 pm | All times are GMT
Forum index » Science and Technology » Math
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts unified theory gb6724 New Theories 4 Fri Jul 21, 2006 5:25 am
No new posts Signal Nonlocality Loophole in Quantum Theory? Jack Sarfatti Math 0 Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:59 am
No new posts A Combinatorics/Graph Theory Question mathlover Undergraduate 1 Wed Jul 19, 2006 11:30 pm
No new posts A Combinatorics/Graph Theory Question mathlover Math 2 Wed Jul 19, 2006 11:02 pm
No new posts A Combinatorics/Graph Theory Question mathlover Combinatorics 0 Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:58 pm

Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Electronics forum |  Medicine forum |  Unix/Linux blog |  Unix/Linux documentation |  Unix/Linux forums  |  send newsletters
 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.0597s ][ Queries: 16 (0.0124s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]