| Author |
Message |
Gib Bogle
science forum Guru
Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 342
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
donstockbauer@hotmail.com
science forum Guru
Joined: 11 Sep 2005
Posts: 733
|
 Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 10:15 pm Post subject:
Re: Self reference
|
|
|
Gib Bogle wrote:
If they're honest, then we should. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fishfry
science forum Guru Wannabe
Joined: 29 Apr 2005
Posts: 299
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:02 am Post subject:
Re: Self reference
|
|
|
In article <e9jg7a$3lh$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>,
Gib Bogle <bogle@ihug.too.much.spam.co.nz> wrote:
Don't believe a word of it, of course. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gib Bogle
science forum Guru
Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 342
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:28 am Post subject:
Re: Self reference
|
|
|
fishfry wrote:
| Quote: | In article <e9jg7a$3lh$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>,
Gib Bogle <bogle@ihug.too.much.spam.co.nz> wrote:
The Wikipedia entry on Wikipedia has a section reviewing criticisms of
Wikipedia, mainly on the issue of accuracy:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia#Criticism_and_controversy
Should we take this criticism seriously or not?
Hofstadter would be tickled.
Don't believe a word of it, of course.
|
Right. The criticisms in this article are not well-founded, therefore
Wikipedia articles _are_ to be trusted, therefore this article is to be
trusted, therefore the criticisms in the article _are_ well-founded, ...
It's a lot of fun. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Google
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Forum index
»
Science and Technology
»
Math
