|
|
| Author |
Message |
Jeff…Relf
science forum Guru Wannabe
Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 114
|
 Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 am Post subject:
_Serious_ job security.
|
|
|
Hi T_Wake, Other's fork my code so they can have _Control_ of it.
They purchased the rights to the source code.
Many programmers ( maybe 7, maybe more, at different times )
have been working on it for years now.
I told them to do a total-rewrite but they wouldn't do it.
As it is, their fork sucks... they spent s**t-loads of money to make it worse.
That gives me some _Serious_ job security. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phineas T Puddleduck
science forum Guru
Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Posts: 759
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 am Post subject:
Re: People fork my code ( because it's good ), I don't fork theirs.
|
|
|
In article <Jeff_Relf_2006_Jul_12_cu1y@Cotse.NET>, Jeff’ĶRelf
<Jeff_Relf@Yahoo.COM> wrote:
| Quote: | Hi Gordon ( and Bill_Snyder ), I meant to say:
People fork my code ( because it's good ), I don't fork theirs.
|
BWAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
--
Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bullshit repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
Corollary -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
³It approaches the asymptote faster, the more Œpseduos¹ you throw in
your formulas.²
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
³Gravity is one of the four fundamental interactions. The classical
theory of gravity - Einstein's general relativity - is the subject
of this book.² : Hartle/ Gravity pg 1
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orange jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson
why parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jeff…Relf
science forum Guru Wannabe
Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 114
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:59 am Post subject:
I'm just happy to have met T.J.
|
|
|
Hi Puddle_Duck, You asked me:
Where are the millions of dollars for which you posted
your home phone number and bank details on USENET ?
T.J. repeatedly asked me, " How much do you want ? " and
I replied, " I don't give a f*** ".
I don't want to be a landlord/shipper/trader/warehouser.
He gave up on me, leaving in frustration.
He's under no obligation to give me a dime.
I'm just happy to have met him. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fwd: from Erik
science forum addict
Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 97
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 1:28 am Post subject:
Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH
|
|
|
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:54:06 +0100, Phineas T Puddleduck
<phineaspuddleduck@googlemail.com_NOSPAM> wrote:
| Quote: | In article <M_ydnWc9i8YpRSvZnZ2dnUVZ8qGdnZ2d@pipex.net>, T Wake
Usenet.es7AT@gishpuppy.com> wrote:
[Phinny]
Did you take into account the pressure dimension of the six spatial
coordinates?
[Hammond]
No problem Phinny,
Hey Hamster,
"Phinny" is in your Kill File remember.
Ah but we understand each other. The contravariant pressure tensor is
co-invariant with the time based Poynting vector of the 3-space
momentum phase space..... As a result, time dilation is an orthogonal
contra-indication of the velocity-color charge inversion field.
|
[Hammond]
A moron would know that's science-gibberish.
Your problem is you can't tell real physics from
gibberish because you're not a competent
scientist despite your claim to have a PhD
in physics.... you're a fuckin phony.
.... a real physicist like me can tell exactly
what your scientific education consists of just by
your use of the term "Poynting vector" which
is never used in theoretical physics and is
only used by low grade "applied physics"
egineering schmucks.... sort of like
mentioning "Laplace transforms" labels you
as an engineer since physicists use
Fourier transforms exclusively.
Get the f*** outta here you're not even
intelligent enough to understand physics
never mind something as sophisticated
as Life After Death you fuckin aggravated
moron.
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
======================================== |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cardinal Chunder
science forum addict
Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 50
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 1:24 pm Post subject:
Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH
|
|
|
George Hammond wrote:
| Quote: | "Bilge" <dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net> wrote in message
news:slrnebe3ni.5k.dubious@radioactivex.lebesque-al.net...
[Denning]
Seriously also: I'm sure there are many papers and dissertations by this
time on so-called net kooks...................
......................Do you know if any papers exist on
line?
[Bilge]
See this one:
www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf
[Hammond]
If I'm such an obvious kook why can't you find
ONE....... just ONE competent scientist to come
|
Why does it require a competent scientist to laugh at someone who has
published a single peer reviewed scientific paper? Oh the merriment to
be had when you laughably claim otherwise...
| Quote: | on here and make the SPOG look stupid... to
expose the SPOG as scientifically incompetent...
|
A whole host of people have made SPOG and the founder of this silly
"proof" look like the silly, angry, narcissistic buffoon that he is.
| Quote: | Answer: BECAUSE YOU CAN'T
BECAUSE THE SPOG
IS IN FACT:
COMPETENT
TRUE
AND
HISTORIC
|
That would be competent in the have-your-arse-handed to you sense, every
time you attempt to demonstrate it. It's funny when you go off on one,
such as the time you claimed you could produce a movie which showed
different images to adults and children? Or that computers were
incapable of showing GIF (or any moving) images at more than 15fps?
Have you got that video yet Georgie? I ask merely since I recall
providing you with the video editing tools required to demonstrate your
claim and then you killfiled me.
Coward.
| Quote: | Go ahead.... the last big shot who tried to
challenge me was Prof. Chris Isham....
(world famous Gravity Physicist at
Imperial College London, Theoretical
Physics Group) and he wound up looking
pathetic, like an impractical no common
sense ignoramus. Which is what you
people sound like.
|
Does common sense require trips to the funny farm?
| Quote: | Go ahead.... I CHALLENGE you... if the
SPOG is incompetent you shouldn't have
ANY trouble finding a competent scientist
to come on here and demonstrate that
the SPOG is incompetent...
|
It's already been debunked to death.
| Quote: | PROBLEM IS..... YOU CAN'T....
all you can do is sit there and call me names and
post halfwit graffiti to my discussion threads,
pathetic stooges!
|
I see, so you don't like being called names and then promptly declare in
a single message that your detractors (everyone else in the world) are
variously halfwits, pathetic, stooges, big shots, ignoramuses and
incompetent.
If its all the same to you, I think I'll keep calling you a kook because
it is clear that you are.
--
"Hello. I'm Leonard Nimoy. The following tale of alien encounters is
true. And by true, I mean false. It's all lies. But they're entertaining
lies. And in the end, isn't that the real truth? The answer is: No." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jim Black
science forum addict
Joined: 07 May 2005
Posts: 85
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 8:21 pm Post subject:
Re: New Forums: PhysicsMathForums.com allow physicists to think independently!! Moving beyond the String Theory Hoax
|
|
|
drelliot@gmail.com wrote:
| Quote: | 6. What Does It Mean For A Dimension to Move?
Einstein's well-regarded theory of General Relativity inherently
necessitates the reality of moving dimensions. And yet some trained
physicists have a knee-jerk reaction that the fourth dimension cannot
be moving because "dimensions cannot move." But dimensions can and do
move relative to one-another. First off, since the universe is
expanding, space-time is alsoexpanding, demonstrating that dimensions
are moving and expanding. Secondly, general relativity demonstrates
that massive objects warp space-time, meaning that as a massive object
moves though space-time, it stretches space-time, showing again that
space-time in one area can move, or deform, relative to space-time in
another area. GR is a sound theory, backed up with multiple
high-profile experiments, including the demonstration that starlight is
bent by the sun and the verification that orbiting stars radiate energy
in the form of gravity waves.
Thus there exist neither philosophical nor physical barriers to the
concept of moving dimensions, but for artificial ones within lazy
minds. A curious sign of the times is that some physicists will accept
on blind faith the existence of ten, twenty, or thirty dimensions,
dimensions that are curled up, or too small to measure, and yet they
will reel in shock and horror at a perfectly obvious postulate--the
fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions.
|
You didn't answer the question. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
G=EMC^2 Glazier
science forum Guru
Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Posts: 527
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 11:26 pm Post subject:
Re: How to discover the real T.J.
|
|
|
TJ Emailed me pictures of a great cargo ship his father own. The state
rooms and big den was outstanding. Those that made fun of TJ (wild
cayote) have no brains or soul. Where is he now? He is missed Bert |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
George Hammond
science forum Guru
Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 624
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 11:39 pm Post subject:
Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH
|
|
|
<jtem01@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1153165314.363410.175670@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: |
George Hammond wrote:
The Pyramids have been dated to 2,600 BC and the entire
Egyptian religion is carved in 10,000 lines of heiroglyphics
inside (each of) said pyramids (at Sakkara) where they can
be SEEN TODAY.
Wow. Even your defense of a factually incorrect argument is
itself factually incorrect.
Could you supply us with as URL to the texts you think you're
seeing on the walls inside the great pyramid?
|
[Hammond]
Sure... the photos are all over the Internet, here are a
few URL's.... at least 10 of the major pyramids at
Sakkara are fully inscribed with the Egyptian Bible
(so called Egyptian Book of the Dead).
http://www.egyptvoyager.com/pyramids_text_collage.htm
http://www.pyramidtextsonline.com/Plan.htm
http://www.egyptvoyager.com/pyramids_text.htm
| Quote: |
Because, I've got to tell you, nobody else can see them!
|
[Hammond]
You don't know what you're talking about.
| Quote: |
The Egyptian religion didn't even show signs
of crumbling until after 300 BC (Greek invasion under
Alexander the Great)....... that makes 3,300 years right
there...
That would make 2,300 years (2,600 - 300 = 2,300), but for
you that's very close.
|
[Hammond]
The "Pyramid texts" are known to be at least 500 years
OLDER than the pyramids.... and 2600+500=3,100.
| Quote: | By the way.... I am a very famous and CELEBRATED
TARGET OF VICIOUS ACADEMIC HECKLING AND
STALKING, suppression and persecution,
Translation: You're just another troll.
|
[Hammond]
Anyone who speaks "Usenetese" is by definition
a simpleton.
| Quote: |
THEREFORE.... if you get on here and start
calling me me a moron you will get s**t on and killfiled so
fast it will make your head spin.
Fine. You're a moron.
|
<snip crap>
[Hammond]
Well, I'll hold off killfiling you because you are still posting
a few meagre scraps of rational, on-topic
commentary which is all that can be expected from
Usenet even at its best. ... naturally, when that ceases
and pure heckling begins your name gets added to the
thousands of full time Usenet hecklers already on the list.
Recall that 90% of Usenet bandwidth consists of heckling
and amateur trolling..
--
========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
======================================== |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jtem01@gmail.com
science forum beginner
Joined: 01 Jul 2006
Posts: 5
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 1:36 am Post subject:
Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH
|
|
|
George Hammond wrote:
| Quote: | Could you supply us with as URL to the texts you think you're
seeing on the walls inside the great pyramid?
Sure... the photos are all over the Internet, here are a
few URL's.... at least 10 of the major pyramids at
Sakkara are fully inscribed with the Egyptian Bible
(so called Egyptian Book of the Dead).
http://www.egyptvoyager.com/pyramids_text_collage.htm
|
Psst. Moron. That's not the great pyramid.
| Quote: | http://www.pyramidtextsonline.com/Plan.htm
|
Wrong pyramid, again. Heck, you haven't even got to the
right dynasty yet....
| Quote: | http://www.egyptvoyager.com/pyramids_text.htm
|
This link just plain disproves you.It flat out states that the
pyramid texts start in the fifth dynasty, while you claimed
that the texts were carved into "each of" the pyramids.
| Quote: | Because, I've got to tell you, nobody else can see them!
You don't know what you're talking about.
|
Yeah, moron, what happened to that killfile?
| Quote: | The Egyptian religion didn't even show signs
of crumbling until after 300 BC (Greek invasion under
Alexander the Great)....... that makes 3,300 years right
there...
That would make 2,300 years (2,600 - 300 = 2,300), but for
you that's very close.
The "Pyramid texts" are known to be at least 500 years
OLDER than the pyramids.... and 2600+500=3,100.
|
And your mother gave you the clap, which is my you hide
yourself behind this usenet trolling...
Now please take your medication. Thanks in advance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
George Hammond
science forum Guru
Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 624
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sven Hesse
science forum beginner
Joined: 20 May 2006
Posts: 21
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 1:40 pm Post subject:
Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH
|
|
|
George Hammond <Nowhere1@notspam.com> wrote:
Do you have several killfiles? Last time you posted that thing, I was in a
higher position there... Or don't you love me anymore?!? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phineas T Puddleduck
science forum Guru
Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Posts: 759
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:02 am Post subject:
Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH
|
|
|
In article <vcVug.9477$PE1.3986@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
George Hammond <Nowhere1@notspam.com> wrote:
| Quote: | [Hammond]
Well, I'll hold off killfiling you because you are still posting
a few meagre scraps of rational, on-topic
commentary which is all that can be expected from
Usenet even at its best. ... naturally, when that ceases
and pure heckling begins your name gets added to the
thousands of full time Usenet hecklers already on the list.
Recall that 90% of Usenet bandwidth consists of heckling
and amateur trolling..
|
Yep - and you're 65% of it right there, maroon
--
Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bullshit repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
Corollary -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
³It approaches the asymptote faster, the more Œpseduos¹ you throw in
your formulas.²
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
³Gravity is one of the four fundamental interactions. The classical
theory of gravity - Einstein's general relativity - is the subject
of this book.² : Hartle/ Gravity pg 1
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orange jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson
why parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phineas T Puddleduck
science forum Guru
Joined: 01 Jun 2006
Posts: 759
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 3:03 pm Post subject:
Re: RELATIVITY CAUSES LIFE AFTER DEATH
|
|
|
In article <G7_ug.5886$vO.4112@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
George Hammond <Nowhere1@notspam.com> wrote:
| Quote: | George Hammond.
=====================================
Usenet heckler/abuser
|
There, much better!
--
Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bullshit repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
Corollary -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
³It approaches the asymptote faster, the more Œpseduos¹ you throw in
your formulas.²
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
³Gravity is one of the four fundamental interactions. The classical
theory of gravity - Einstein's general relativity - is the subject
of this book.² : Hartle/ Gravity pg 1
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orange jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson
why parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Google
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
The time now is Mon Dec 01, 2008 6:17 pm | All times are GMT
|
|
Scooter Goods | Credit Cards | Mobile Phones | Mortgages | MPAA
|
|
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
|
|
Other DeniX Solutions sites:
Electronics forum |
Medicine forum |
Unix/Linux blog |
Unix/Linux documentation |
Unix/Linux forums
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Forum index
»
Science and Technology
»
Physics
»
New Theories
