|
|
| Author |
Message |
Phony Account science forum beginner
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 10
|
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:54 pm Post subject:
stainless steel skin depth in RF applications
|
|
|
Hi group readers,
I realize the conductivity of steel is some 30-40 times worse than that
of copper. But for RF (10-100MHz) applications, it is the skin effect
that matters, then the surface conductivity of stainless is "only" six
times worse then copper.
However, a colleague of mine suggested the picture might be worse,
because at these frequencies we are talking about micron size
skin-depths, and in that case the grain structure of the metal may play
a role not accounted for in the simple theory.
Comments?
Thanks,
Mirko |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jim Potter science forum beginner
Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 1
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 1:03 pm Post subject:
Re: stainless steel skin depth in RF applications
|
|
|
Phony Account wrote:
| Quote: | Hi group readers,
I realize the conductivity of steel is some 30-40 times worse than that
of copper. But for RF (10-100MHz) applications, it is the skin effect
that matters, then the surface conductivity of stainless is "only" six
times worse then copper.
However, a colleague of mine suggested the picture might be worse,
because at these frequencies we are talking about micron size
skin-depths, and in that case the grain structure of the metal may play
a role not accounted for in the simple theory.
Comments?
Thanks,
Mirko
|
Also, surface finish plays a role. The effective conductivity is reduced
if the surface roughness is comparable to the skin depth.
Jim |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phony Account science forum beginner
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 10
|
Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 12:24 am Post subject:
Re: stainless steel skin depth in RF applications
|
|
|
Jim Potter wrote:
| Quote: | Phony Account wrote:
Hi group readers,
I realize the conductivity of steel is some 30-40 times worse than
that of copper. But for RF (10-100MHz) applications, it is the skin
effect that matters, then the surface conductivity of stainless is
"only" six times worse then copper.
However, a colleague of mine suggested the picture might be worse,
because at these frequencies we are talking about micron size
skin-depths, and in that case the grain structure of the metal may
play a role not accounted for in the simple theory.
Comments?
Thanks,
Mirko
Also, surface finish plays a role. The effective conductivity is reduced
if the surface roughness is comparable to the skin depth.
Jim
Hm, that's interesting. But how exactly does the roughness play a role? |
It is much smaller than all wavelengths of interest, so the only
effect I see is that of increased path length. However, the "width" of
the conductor is also increased, so the two would cancel out.
Mirko |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
The time now is Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:41 pm | All times are GMT
|
|
Online Advertising | Web Games | Web Advertising | Online Advertising | Credit Cards
|
|
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
|
|
Other DeniX Solutions sites:
Electronics forum |
Medicine forum |
Unix/Linux blog |
Unix/Linux documentation |
Unix/Linux forums
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|