Energy=mc^2 so is Charge=mc^3 and evidence for

Guest

I arrive at this question in a strange way. Strange and pretty. Our
best estimate of the total mass of the observable Universe is 10^30 kg
for our Sun times the average number of stars per galaxy is 10^11 times
the total number of galaxies is 10^10 which gives us the total mass of
the observable universe as 10^51 kg.

So in an Atom Totality, the difference in masses of the proton and
electron should mirror image the mass of the observable universe. And
the mass of the proton or neutron is 10^-27 kg and the speed of light
is 10^8 m/s in the MKS system. So 10^-27 taking the inverse is 10^27 x
10^8 x 10^8 x 10^8 which yields 10^51 kg.

Is this coincidence or is this the hidden but ultimate meaning of the
concept of charge in physics. Is charge really more than the assignment
of -1 and +1. I thinks so.

I think that the ultimate meaning of charge is a generalization of
energy. Energy is E=mc^2 and charge is a more general dimension which
includes energy. So charge is one more dimension to that of energy.

And in the Atom Totality Theory all the forces become one force which
is the Coulomb force and so gravity is a fictional force. The Coulomb
force is what holds together the large scale universe because the mass
of galaxies stars and planets are chunks of the last six electrons of
231Pu. So it is charge of the protons of the 231Pu Atom Totality that
hold together the galaxies and stars and Solar Systems.

I have made a search through physics to find out whether there exists
any other equation of importance that has a "cubed" term. So far there
is only one such equation and it is the Kepler 3rd law where the
squares of periods proportional to cubes of axes of orbits. Now I tried
yesterday to translate that Kepler 3rd law into purely Electromagnetism
and was unable. Now I realize that the three Kepler laws translates
into Newton's law of gravity, but in the Atom Totality there is no
gravity force. So this inability to translate Kepler's 3rd law into
Electromagnetic phenomenon suggests to me that there exists a
translation but a unique one. The unique translation is that the
Kepler's 3rd law is translated into what the concept of Charge is in
physics. The translation of Kepler's 1st and 2nd law into that of the
Coulomb law is a great translation but it leaves Kepler's 3rd law as
not translatable into EM. Now we have that translation and it is that
of Charge.

So if Energy is mc^2 means that energy is 3 dimensional but that charge
is 4 dimensional and includes energy as a subset. Charge would be mc^3.

I would need to work-out and see how the Kepler 3rd law is equivalent
to Charge=mc^3. At first sight it seems that the orbit of planets
periods and semimajor axes is vastly different from charge and speed of
light.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Google