|
|
| Author |
Message |
Fusioneer
science forum beginner
Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 49
|
 Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 10:02 pm Post subject:
Basic Dark Matter Question & Fusion...Pay Attention Please!
|
|
|
On 6/2/05 2:53, in article mt2.0-31536-1117706019@hercules.herts.ac.uk,
"Rantrod" <rantrod@iwon.com> wrote:
| Quote: | I am curious about one aspect of the Dark Matter issue. Basically the
argument is that there is more matter evident by the movement of the
galaxies and such than there is from observable luminous matter. For
example, if you were far enough from our own solar system, you would
only be able to see the sun, yet by analyzing the movements of the
solar system, it would be evident that there is a lot more mass than
just the sun. I don't understand why this is such a big deal, off
course there is more mass than just the sun, lots more! We got lots of
planets, asteroid belts, meteors, etc. It doesn't seem worthy of such
deep analysis as I'm seeing on the scientific community. When we're
talking about a galaxy such as ours, I'm sure there is plenty of
non-luminous stuff out there, 5-10 times more non-luminous than
luminous matter sounds reasonable. Furthermore, I don't think we'll
have the technology to account for every stellar object in our galaxy
for hundreds of years. When we're talking about the universe as a
whole, I think it would be pretty darn silly for us to suspect we can
see it all from our puny telescopes. I don't think we'll be able to
map the whole universe for thousands of years.
Is there anyone who can explain in plain terms why is it more
complicated than what I just explained?
|
Well, let me spell it out. Dark matter is dark because it cannot
allow electrons to fall down to the ground state with the baryons. No
one knew this until I discovered it but a gravitational field will
produce a strong charge separation effect and it excludes electrons
from the terminus region of the gravitational field of a star. Oh, and
I discovered that the essence of a gravitational field is a charge and
its conjugate in superposition structured in a vector field like a Del
X H or Del X E. The terminus of the gravitational field that
originates from such a large scale standing wave boson is along the
toroidal axis of that flux toroid. A side issue is that photons are
gravitational charge units. Who knew? LOL. I did. Photons can be
forced to disassociate into a charge and its conjugate...electron and
positron. The gravitational field of a photon is precisely what gives
the photon the ability to ionize matter...because of the charge
separation mechanism. This really isn't all that difficult folks...
A gravitational field is a time rate gradient field... Think about it.
Particles that approach the terminus of a gravitational field (the
terminus is a loop not a point and it is the closed line at which the
time is most strongly dilated) will immediately begin to overlap in
momentum space because they develop a common de Broglie wavelength that
is equal to or greater than their interparticle distance --- why?
Because with respect to any outside observer their relative speed with
respect to each other begins to approach 0. And lambda = h/mv so as
v->0 then lambda -> large values and the begin to overlap in momentum
space. It is really trivial to show that elementary charges which are
overlapping in the same momentum space will behave opposite to the
expectations of Coulomb's law... That's right folks...there is no
strong force...what we've been calling the strong force is really
entirely electromagnetic in nature and it is so damn easy to show that
this is true that I'm just amazed that so many bright people never
figured this out. No strong force... No gluons, no quarks... Amazing
that so many people are so easily taken in by the results of inductive
logic which cannot yield certainties.
So, that matter...which I have called Isaacium is just pure neutrons
and protons...entirely baryonic. I named it Isaacium because Isaac in
Hebrew means the laughter of disbelief and I figured that most astro
guys and cosmologists will laugh in disbelief at the suggestion that
I've actually managed to unify electromagnetism and gravity and could
deduce the existence of this baryonic matter because I discovered that
a gravitation field will produce a strong charge separation
effect...something no one else has suggested. It is heavy precisely
because electrons are excluded and so it doesn't possess atomic volume
(which are related to the presence of electrons). It is dark for the
same reason... No electron associations. And you can see that it
occurs in rings...loops that are coincident to the toroidal axis of the
standing wave boson that is the primary physical feature of a star.
So, if the boson is displaced or expands more rapidly than the Isaacium
ring can accommodate to it then a supernova results as a cascade of
electrons flows down to the Isaacium and is acquired by it. The result
is that the Isaacium begins to differentiate into a wide variety of
atomic species... There is an immense radiation flux that will emerge
because of all those electrons falling down to ground states and an
immense explosion as the Isaacium makes the transition from having only
nuclear volume to acquiring atomic volume as it differentiates into
ordinary elements. I was hoping people would get a clue as to why the
primary signature of a recent supernova is an expanding ring of matter.
How do you get an expanding ring except that you start with a ring?
People should pay more attention to the clues that the universe gives
us.
How's this relate to fusion?.. get a clue people... I'm becoming
embarassed for you all. Does everything have to be spelled out for
you? Fusion occurs only when fusion fuel nuclei are overlapping in
momentum space.
My stabilized standing wave boson reactor system design, called the
SKYBOLT(tm) reactor, is the only way to build a functioning safe
nuclear reactor system.
C. Cagle |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bret Cahill
science forum Guru
Joined: 05 May 2005
Posts: 480
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2005 12:48 am Post subject:
Re: Basic Dark Matter Question & Fusion...Pay Attention Please!
|
|
|
An acquaintence suggested we look for "white holes."
Bret Cahill |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rick Nelson
science forum addict
Joined: 05 Jun 2005
Posts: 83
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2005 12:55 am Post subject:
Re: Basic Dark Matter Question & Fusion...Pay Attention Please!
|
|
|
You know - Boronic Aluminium,
I'm still waiting on the constrctive to toroid volume answer to several
of my questions to you.
I don't suppose you smoke toroidal cigarettes?
String Theory makes all the fools who doubted it and damned it think
alike. String Theorists are already looking at the "blast interface" of
our Universe' first unconcievably small time events whose spacially
doped energy space waves are probably physically more disturbed than the
internal parts of black holes.
Fusioneer wrote:
| Quote: | On 6/2/05 2:53, in article mt2.0-31536-1117706019@hercules.herts.ac.uk,
"Rantrod" <rantrod@iwon.com> wrote:
I am curious about one aspect of the Dark Matter issue. Basically the
argument is that there is more matter evident by the movement of the
galaxies and such than there is from observable luminous matter. For
example, if you were far enough from our own solar system, you would
only be able to see the sun, yet by analyzing the movements of the
solar system, it would be evident that there is a lot more mass than
just the sun. I don't understand why this is such a big deal, off
course there is more mass than just the sun, lots more! We got lots of
planets, asteroid belts, meteors, etc. It doesn't seem worthy of such
deep analysis as I'm seeing on the scientific community. When we're
talking about a galaxy such as ours, I'm sure there is plenty of
non-luminous stuff out there, 5-10 times more non-luminous than
luminous matter sounds reasonable. Furthermore, I don't think we'll
have the technology to account for every stellar object in our galaxy
for hundreds of years. When we're talking about the universe as a
whole, I think it would be pretty darn silly for us to suspect we can
see it all from our puny telescopes. I don't think we'll be able to
map the whole universe for thousands of years.
Is there anyone who can explain in plain terms why is it more
complicated than what I just explained?
Well, let me spell it out. Dark matter is dark because it cannot
allow electrons to fall down to the ground state with the baryons. No
one knew this until I discovered it but a gravitational field will
produce a strong charge separation effect and it excludes electrons
from the terminus region of the gravitational field of a star. Oh, and
I discovered that the essence of a gravitational field is a charge and
its conjugate in superposition structured in a vector field like a Del
X H or Del X E. The terminus of the gravitational field that
originates from such a large scale standing wave boson is along the
toroidal axis of that flux toroid. A side issue is that photons are
gravitational charge units. Who knew? LOL. I did. Photons can be
forced to disassociate into a charge and its conjugate...electron and
positron. The gravitational field of a photon is precisely what gives
the photon the ability to ionize matter...because of the charge
separation mechanism. This really isn't all that difficult folks...
A gravitational field is a time rate gradient field... Think about it.
Particles that approach the terminus of a gravitational field (the
terminus is a loop not a point and it is the closed line at which the
time is most strongly dilated) will immediately begin to overlap in
momentum space because they develop a common de Broglie wavelength that
is equal to or greater than their interparticle distance --- why?
Because with respect to any outside observer their relative speed with
respect to each other begins to approach 0. And lambda = h/mv so as
v->0 then lambda -> large values and the begin to overlap in momentum
space. It is really trivial to show that elementary charges which are
overlapping in the same momentum space will behave opposite to the
expectations of Coulomb's law... That's right folks...there is no
strong force...what we've been calling the strong force is really
entirely electromagnetic in nature and it is so damn easy to show that
this is true that I'm just amazed that so many bright people never
figured this out. No strong force... No gluons, no quarks... Amazing
that so many people are so easily taken in by the results of inductive
logic which cannot yield certainties.
So, that matter...which I have called Isaacium is just pure neutrons
and protons...entirely baryonic. I named it Isaacium because Isaac in
Hebrew means the laughter of disbelief and I figured that most astro
guys and cosmologists will laugh in disbelief at the suggestion that
I've actually managed to unify electromagnetism and gravity and could
deduce the existence of this baryonic matter because I discovered that
a gravitation field will produce a strong charge separation
effect...something no one else has suggested. It is heavy precisely
because electrons are excluded and so it doesn't possess atomic volume
(which are related to the presence of electrons). It is dark for the
same reason... No electron associations. And you can see that it
occurs in rings...loops that are coincident to the toroidal axis of the
standing wave boson that is the primary physical feature of a star.
So, if the boson is displaced or expands more rapidly than the Isaacium
ring can accommodate to it then a supernova results as a cascade of
electrons flows down to the Isaacium and is acquired by it. The result
is that the Isaacium begins to differentiate into a wide variety of
atomic species... There is an immense radiation flux that will emerge
because of all those electrons falling down to ground states and an
immense explosion as the Isaacium makes the transition from having only
nuclear volume to acquiring atomic volume as it differentiates into
ordinary elements. I was hoping people would get a clue as to why the
primary signature of a recent supernova is an expanding ring of matter.
How do you get an expanding ring except that you start with a ring?
People should pay more attention to the clues that the universe gives
us.
How's this relate to fusion?.. get a clue people... I'm becoming
embarassed for you all. Does everything have to be spelled out for
you? Fusion occurs only when fusion fuel nuclei are overlapping in
momentum space.
My stabilized standing wave boson reactor system design, called the
SKYBOLT(tm) reactor, is the only way to build a functioning safe
nuclear reactor system.
C. Cagle
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bret Cahill
science forum Guru
Joined: 05 May 2005
Posts: 480
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2005 3:46 pm Post subject:
Re: Basic Dark Matter Question & Fusion...Pay Attention Please!
|
|
|
Maybe he meant we look for white hos'.
Bret Cahill |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rick Nelson
science forum addict
Joined: 05 Jun 2005
Posts: 83
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2005 11:22 pm Post subject:
Re: Basic Dark Matter Question & Fusion...Pay Attention Please!
|
|
|
I believe you Boronandonandon Hubristica,
But I think I'm the only one listening to you. Finally, you have posted
something believable in theory instead of just posting how isotopes
migrate in the tungsten filaments of light bulbs. (I guess you were
trying to be subtle in how the "strong force" radiates spatially
expansive "particles" that fuel the expansion of the parts of our
Universe that we currently understand in a "sort of" and "hand waving"
kind of way.. Have you seen equations? Can you send me some in Maple
format?
Six months ago - I thought I was about to break the Prime Function..
But it gets really tricky when the intervals become nearly infinite. I
would hate to think that even things as simple as positive integer
counting numbers break down near some parts of infinity.. But it looks
like they do.
I think what we are taling about is 'connective string theory' = and
this is derived from the Quark interaction dynamic - as it stands and is
measured currently in posted literature?
Thanks,
Ricxk
Fusioneer wrote:
| Quote: | On 6/2/05 2:53, in article mt2.0-31536-1117706019@hercules.herts.ac.uk,
"Rantrod" <rantrod@iwon.com> wrote:
I am curious about one aspect of the Dark Matter issue. Basically the
argument is that there is more matter evident by the movement of the
galaxies and such than there is from observable luminous matter. For
example, if you were far enough from our own solar system, you would
only be able to see the sun, yet by analyzing the movements of the
solar system, it would be evident that there is a lot more mass than
just the sun. I don't understand why this is such a big deal, off
course there is more mass than just the sun, lots more! We got lots of
planets, asteroid belts, meteors, etc. It doesn't seem worthy of such
deep analysis as I'm seeing on the scientific community. When we're
talking about a galaxy such as ours, I'm sure there is plenty of
non-luminous stuff out there, 5-10 times more non-luminous than
luminous matter sounds reasonable. Furthermore, I don't think we'll
have the technology to account for every stellar object in our galaxy
for hundreds of years. When we're talking about the universe as a
whole, I think it would be pretty darn silly for us to suspect we can
see it all from our puny telescopes. I don't think we'll be able to
map the whole universe for thousands of years.
Is there anyone who can explain in plain terms why is it more
complicated than what I just explained?
Well, let me spell it out. Dark matter is dark because it cannot
allow electrons to fall down to the ground state with the baryons. No
one knew this until I discovered it but a gravitational field will
produce a strong charge separation effect and it excludes electrons
from the terminus region of the gravitational field of a star. Oh, and
I discovered that the essence of a gravitational field is a charge and
its conjugate in superposition structured in a vector field like a Del
X H or Del X E. The terminus of the gravitational field that
originates from such a large scale standing wave boson is along the
toroidal axis of that flux toroid. A side issue is that photons are
gravitational charge units. Who knew? LOL. I did. Photons can be
forced to disassociate into a charge and its conjugate...electron and
positron. The gravitational field of a photon is precisely what gives
the photon the ability to ionize matter...because of the charge
separation mechanism. This really isn't all that difficult folks...
A gravitational field is a time rate gradient field... Think about it.
Particles that approach the terminus of a gravitational field (the
terminus is a loop not a point and it is the closed line at which the
time is most strongly dilated) will immediately begin to overlap in
momentum space because they develop a common de Broglie wavelength that
is equal to or greater than their interparticle distance --- why?
Because with respect to any outside observer their relative speed with
respect to each other begins to approach 0. And lambda = h/mv so as
v->0 then lambda -> large values and the begin to overlap in momentum
space. It is really trivial to show that elementary charges which are
overlapping in the same momentum space will behave opposite to the
expectations of Coulomb's law... That's right folks...there is no
strong force...what we've been calling the strong force is really
entirely electromagnetic in nature and it is so damn easy to show that
this is true that I'm just amazed that so many bright people never
figured this out. No strong force... No gluons, no quarks... Amazing
that so many people are so easily taken in by the results of inductive
logic which cannot yield certainties.
So, that matter...which I have called Isaacium is just pure neutrons
and protons...entirely baryonic. I named it Isaacium because Isaac in
Hebrew means the laughter of disbelief and I figured that most astro
guys and cosmologists will laugh in disbelief at the suggestion that
I've actually managed to unify electromagnetism and gravity and could
deduce the existence of this baryonic matter because I discovered that
a gravitation field will produce a strong charge separation
effect...something no one else has suggested. It is heavy precisely
because electrons are excluded and so it doesn't possess atomic volume
(which are related to the presence of electrons). It is dark for the
same reason... No electron associations. And you can see that it
occurs in rings...loops that are coincident to the toroidal axis of the
standing wave boson that is the primary physical feature of a star.
So, if the boson is displaced or expands more rapidly than the Isaacium
ring can accommodate to it then a supernova results as a cascade of
electrons flows down to the Isaacium and is acquired by it. The result
is that the Isaacium begins to differentiate into a wide variety of
atomic species... There is an immense radiation flux that will emerge
because of all those electrons falling down to ground states and an
immense explosion as the Isaacium makes the transition from having only
nuclear volume to acquiring atomic volume as it differentiates into
ordinary elements. I was hoping people would get a clue as to why the
primary signature of a recent supernova is an expanding ring of matter.
How do you get an expanding ring except that you start with a ring?
People should pay more attention to the clues that the universe gives
us.
How's this relate to fusion?.. get a clue people... I'm becoming
embarassed for you all. Does everything have to be spelled out for
you? Fusion occurs only when fusion fuel nuclei are overlapping in
momentum space.
My stabilized standing wave boson reactor system design, called the
SKYBOLT(tm) reactor, is the only way to build a functioning safe
nuclear reactor system.
C. Cagle
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rick Nelson
science forum addict
Joined: 05 Jun 2005
Posts: 83
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2005 11:27 pm Post subject:
Re: Basic Dark Matter Question & Fusion...Pay Attention Please!
|
|
|
WOW!
I've never seen more than one person on spf be able to type simultaneously.
I guess that makes the 2 of you suspect of being the same person.
Thanks,
Rick
Fusioneer wrote:
| Quote: | On 6/2/05 2:53, in article mt2.0-31536-1117706019@hercules.herts.ac.uk,
"Rantrod" <rantrod@iwon.com> wrote:
I am curious about one aspect of the Dark Matter issue. Basically the
argument is that there is more matter evident by the movement of the
galaxies and such than there is from observable luminous matter. For
example, if you were far enough from our own solar system, you would
only be able to see the sun, yet by analyzing the movements of the
solar system, it would be evident that there is a lot more mass than
just the sun. I don't understand why this is such a big deal, off
course there is more mass than just the sun, lots more! We got lots of
planets, asteroid belts, meteors, etc. It doesn't seem worthy of such
deep analysis as I'm seeing on the scientific community. When we're
talking about a galaxy such as ours, I'm sure there is plenty of
non-luminous stuff out there, 5-10 times more non-luminous than
luminous matter sounds reasonable. Furthermore, I don't think we'll
have the technology to account for every stellar object in our galaxy
for hundreds of years. When we're talking about the universe as a
whole, I think it would be pretty darn silly for us to suspect we can
see it all from our puny telescopes. I don't think we'll be able to
map the whole universe for thousands of years.
Is there anyone who can explain in plain terms why is it more
complicated than what I just explained?
Well, let me spell it out. Dark matter is dark because it cannot
allow electrons to fall down to the ground state with the baryons. No
one knew this until I discovered it but a gravitational field will
produce a strong charge separation effect and it excludes electrons
from the terminus region of the gravitational field of a star. Oh, and
I discovered that the essence of a gravitational field is a charge and
its conjugate in superposition structured in a vector field like a Del
X H or Del X E. The terminus of the gravitational field that
originates from such a large scale standing wave boson is along the
toroidal axis of that flux toroid. A side issue is that photons are
gravitational charge units. Who knew? LOL. I did. Photons can be
forced to disassociate into a charge and its conjugate...electron and
positron. The gravitational field of a photon is precisely what gives
the photon the ability to ionize matter...because of the charge
separation mechanism. This really isn't all that difficult folks...
A gravitational field is a time rate gradient field... Think about it.
Particles that approach the terminus of a gravitational field (the
terminus is a loop not a point and it is the closed line at which the
time is most strongly dilated) will immediately begin to overlap in
momentum space because they develop a common de Broglie wavelength that
is equal to or greater than their interparticle distance --- why?
Because with respect to any outside observer their relative speed with
respect to each other begins to approach 0. And lambda = h/mv so as
v->0 then lambda -> large values and the begin to overlap in momentum
space. It is really trivial to show that elementary charges which are
overlapping in the same momentum space will behave opposite to the
expectations of Coulomb's law... That's right folks...there is no
strong force...what we've been calling the strong force is really
entirely electromagnetic in nature and it is so damn easy to show that
this is true that I'm just amazed that so many bright people never
figured this out. No strong force... No gluons, no quarks... Amazing
that so many people are so easily taken in by the results of inductive
logic which cannot yield certainties.
So, that matter...which I have called Isaacium is just pure neutrons
and protons...entirely baryonic. I named it Isaacium because Isaac in
Hebrew means the laughter of disbelief and I figured that most astro
guys and cosmologists will laugh in disbelief at the suggestion that
I've actually managed to unify electromagnetism and gravity and could
deduce the existence of this baryonic matter because I discovered that
a gravitation field will produce a strong charge separation
effect...something no one else has suggested. It is heavy precisely
because electrons are excluded and so it doesn't possess atomic volume
(which are related to the presence of electrons). It is dark for the
same reason... No electron associations. And you can see that it
occurs in rings...loops that are coincident to the toroidal axis of the
standing wave boson that is the primary physical feature of a star.
So, if the boson is displaced or expands more rapidly than the Isaacium
ring can accommodate to it then a supernova results as a cascade of
electrons flows down to the Isaacium and is acquired by it. The result
is that the Isaacium begins to differentiate into a wide variety of
atomic species... There is an immense radiation flux that will emerge
because of all those electrons falling down to ground states and an
immense explosion as the Isaacium makes the transition from having only
nuclear volume to acquiring atomic volume as it differentiates into
ordinary elements. I was hoping people would get a clue as to why the
primary signature of a recent supernova is an expanding ring of matter.
How do you get an expanding ring except that you start with a ring?
People should pay more attention to the clues that the universe gives
us.
How's this relate to fusion?.. get a clue people... I'm becoming
embarassed for you all. Does everything have to be spelled out for
you? Fusion occurs only when fusion fuel nuclei are overlapping in
momentum space.
My stabilized standing wave boson reactor system design, called the
SKYBOLT(tm) reactor, is the only way to build a functioning safe
nuclear reactor system.
C. Cagle
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rick Nelson
science forum addict
Joined: 05 Jun 2005
Posts: 83
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2005 11:47 pm Post subject:
Re: Basic Dark Matter Question & Fusion...Pay Attention Please!
|
|
|
Well Hadropheles Mentorium,
You suck the dark matter out of your mental masturbation further.
Why shouldn't "dark matter" and the "light matter" and all the other
intermediate matters of this Universe be as self-organizing in of these
phases of our Universe as haydrionic matter in this low level cycle of
this part of the Universe in our immediate vicinity's evolution?
America is made of Golem Crap Futurist Fascists (at this time).. I
THINK IN THE FUTURE THE UBER SPECIES WILL BE QUAIL. (GOD HELP CHENEY IN
HIS HELLISH FALL)
Hyper-Capitalism and Slavery - NEXUS
Fusioneer wrote:
| Quote: | On 6/2/05 2:53, in article mt2.0-31536-1117706019@hercules.herts.ac.uk,
"Rantrod" <rantrod@iwon.com> wrote:
I am curious about one aspect of the Dark Matter issue. Basically the
argument is that there is more matter evident by the movement of the
galaxies and such than there is from observable luminous matter. For
example, if you were far enough from our own solar system, you would
only be able to see the sun, yet by analyzing the movements of the
solar system, it would be evident that there is a lot more mass than
just the sun. I don't understand why this is such a big deal, off
course there is more mass than just the sun, lots more! We got lots of
planets, asteroid belts, meteors, etc. It doesn't seem worthy of such
deep analysis as I'm seeing on the scientific community. When we're
talking about a galaxy such as ours, I'm sure there is plenty of
non-luminous stuff out there, 5-10 times more non-luminous than
luminous matter sounds reasonable. Furthermore, I don't think we'll
have the technology to account for every stellar object in our galaxy
for hundreds of years. When we're talking about the universe as a
whole, I think it would be pretty darn silly for us to suspect we can
see it all from our puny telescopes. I don't think we'll be able to
map the whole universe for thousands of years.
Is there anyone who can explain in plain terms why is it more
complicated than what I just explained?
Well, let me spell it out. Dark matter is dark because it cannot
allow electrons to fall down to the ground state with the baryons. No
one knew this until I discovered it but a gravitational field will
produce a strong charge separation effect and it excludes electrons
from the terminus region of the gravitational field of a star. Oh, and
I discovered that the essence of a gravitational field is a charge and
its conjugate in superposition structured in a vector field like a Del
X H or Del X E. The terminus of the gravitational field that
originates from such a large scale standing wave boson is along the
toroidal axis of that flux toroid. A side issue is that photons are
gravitational charge units. Who knew? LOL. I did. Photons can be
forced to disassociate into a charge and its conjugate...electron and
positron. The gravitational field of a photon is precisely what gives
the photon the ability to ionize matter...because of the charge
separation mechanism. This really isn't all that difficult folks...
A gravitational field is a time rate gradient field... Think about it.
Particles that approach the terminus of a gravitational field (the
terminus is a loop not a point and it is the closed line at which the
time is most strongly dilated) will immediately begin to overlap in
momentum space because they develop a common de Broglie wavelength that
is equal to or greater than their interparticle distance --- why?
Because with respect to any outside observer their relative speed with
respect to each other begins to approach 0. And lambda = h/mv so as
v->0 then lambda -> large values and the begin to overlap in momentum
space. It is really trivial to show that elementary charges which are
overlapping in the same momentum space will behave opposite to the
expectations of Coulomb's law... That's right folks...there is no
strong force...what we've been calling the strong force is really
entirely electromagnetic in nature and it is so damn easy to show that
this is true that I'm just amazed that so many bright people never
figured this out. No strong force... No gluons, no quarks... Amazing
that so many people are so easily taken in by the results of inductive
logic which cannot yield certainties.
So, that matter...which I have called Isaacium is just pure neutrons
and protons...entirely baryonic. I named it Isaacium because Isaac in
Hebrew means the laughter of disbelief and I figured that most astro
guys and cosmologists will laugh in disbelief at the suggestion that
I've actually managed to unify electromagnetism and gravity and could
deduce the existence of this baryonic matter because I discovered that
a gravitation field will produce a strong charge separation
effect...something no one else has suggested. It is heavy precisely
because electrons are excluded and so it doesn't possess atomic volume
(which are related to the presence of electrons). It is dark for the
same reason... No electron associations. And you can see that it
occurs in rings...loops that are coincident to the toroidal axis of the
standing wave boson that is the primary physical feature of a star.
So, if the boson is displaced or expands more rapidly than the Isaacium
ring can accommodate to it then a supernova results as a cascade of
electrons flows down to the Isaacium and is acquired by it. The result
is that the Isaacium begins to differentiate into a wide variety of
atomic species... There is an immense radiation flux that will emerge
because of all those electrons falling down to ground states and an
immense explosion as the Isaacium makes the transition from having only
nuclear volume to acquiring atomic volume as it differentiates into
ordinary elements. I was hoping people would get a clue as to why the
primary signature of a recent supernova is an expanding ring of matter.
How do you get an expanding ring except that you start with a ring?
People should pay more attention to the clues that the universe gives
us.
How's this relate to fusion?.. get a clue people... I'm becoming
embarassed for you all. Does everything have to be spelled out for
you? Fusion occurs only when fusion fuel nuclei are overlapping in
momentum space.
My stabilized standing wave boson reactor system design, called the
SKYBOLT(tm) reactor, is the only way to build a functioning safe
nuclear reactor system.
C. Cagle
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Google
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
The time now is Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:50 pm | All times are GMT
|
|
Credit Cards Help | Loans | Ringtones | Credit Cards Help | Notebook Deals
|
|
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
|
|
Other DeniX Solutions sites:
Electronics forum |
Medicine forum |
Unix/Linux blog |
Unix/Linux documentation |
Unix/Linux forums
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Forum index
»
Science and Technology
»
Physics
»
Fusion
