FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics » Research
"Weyl" type hidden gauge invariance in General Relativity
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [2 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Jack Sarfatti
science forum Guru


Joined: 29 Apr 2005
Posts: 487

PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2005 3:28 pm    Post subject: "Weyl" type hidden gauge invariance in General Relativity Reply with quote

OK we hit a temporary snag solved below. In elementary physics first
rule is to check your units and physical dimensions. Don't mix apples
with oranges etc. Yet GR theorists do that nonchalantly and sloppily
even in text books.

For example, the SSS metric is typically written as

gtt = -(1 - 2GM/c^2r) [dimensionless]

grr = (1 - 2GM/c^2r)^-1 [dimensionless]

But hold on

gthetatheta = r^2 [area]

gphiphi = r^2sin^2theta [area]

Where we have the incommensurate basis set of Cartan 1-forms

dx^0 = cdt
dx^1 = dr
dx^2 = dtheta
dx^3 = dphi

With the Grassmann basis sort of "Clifford" algebra" of 2^4 = 16
p-forms, p = 0,1,2,3,4

*p-form = (4 - p)-form, when N = 4.

1

dx^u

dx^u/\dx^v

dx^u/\dx^v/\dx^w

dx^u/\dx^v/\dx^w/\dx^l

This gives an incommensurate set of Levi-Civita connection field
components in the hovering LNIFs

(LC)^001 = [2(1 - 2GM/c^2r)]^-1 (1 - 2GM/c^2r),r [1/length]

(LC)^122 = -r(1 - 2GM/c^2r) [length]

(LC)^233 = -sinthetacostheta [dimensionless]

(LC)^100 = (1/2)(1 - 2GM/c^2r),r(1 - 2GM/c^2r) [1/length]

(LC)^133 = -(rsin^2theta)(1 - 2GM/c^2r) [length]

(LC)^313 = (LC)^212 = 1/r [1/length]

(LC)^111 = (1/2)(1 - 2GM/c^2r)(1 - 2GM/c^2r)^-1,r [1/length]

(LC)^323 = cottheta [dimensionless]

all other (LC) identically & globally zero in this FRAME BUNDLE of
hovering LNIFs all over this toy model 4D space-time

My original suggestion gthetatheta = gphiphi = 1 will not work here
because physically we have a stretch-squeeze tidal curvature that
requires the theta dependence in addition to the radial dependence.

Nevertheless we MUST use commensurate infinitesimal basis sets for our
local frames and the (LC) components MUST all be of the same physical
dimension in order to define consistent Diff(4) covariant derivatives.

For example

Au;v = Au,v - (LC)uv^wAw

The GRAVITY-MATTER MINIMAL COUPLING SUM (LC)uv^wAw must have physically
commensurate (LC) components because Au is arbitrary! For example, Au
can be the Maxwell EM vector potential, and all the components of Au
have same physical dimensions.

Therefore ALL the (LC) MUST obey [LC] = 1/length

So, how to we accomplish this?

Simple, use engineering dimensional analysis and introduce a scale L.

What is L? Is L = Lp = (hG/c^3)^1/2 or is L = GM/c^2 or?

For now let's call it "L".

Therefore the SSS metric is now the physically commensurate
dimensionless array

gtt = -(1 - 2GM/c^2r)

grr = (1 - 2GM/c^2r)^-1

gthetatheta = (r/L)^2

gphiphi = (r/L)^2sin^2theta

Where we NOW have the commensurate set of basic 1-forms

dx^0 = cdt
dx^1 = dr
dx^2 = Ldtheta
dx^3 = Ldphi

Note that

,0 = (1/c),t

,1 = ,r

,2 = (1/L),theta

,3 = (l/L),phi

Therefore, all the (LC) are now [1/length]

LC)^001 = [2(1 - 2GM/c^2r)]^-1 (1 - 2GM/c^2r),r

(LC)^122 = -(r/L^2)(1 - 2GM/c^2r)

(LC)^233 = -(1/L)sinthetacostheta

(LC)^100 = (1/2)(1 - 2GM/c^2r),r(1 - 2GM/c^2r)

(LC)^133 = -(rsin^2theta/L^2)(1 - 2GM/c^2r)

(LC)^313 = (LC)^212 = 1/r

(LC)^111 = (1/2)(1 - 2GM/c^2r)(1 - 2GM/c^2r)^-1,r

(LC)^323 = (1/L)cottheta [dimensionless]

The Riemann-Christoffel tensor is now dimensionally self-consistent,
i.e. 1/Area

Note that L cancels out of the frame invariant

ds^2 = guvdx^udx^v

and it must cancel out of any local physical quantity.

In particular it must cancel out of the geodesic equation and the tidal
geodesic deviation.

It's pretty obvious that L will be physically locally unobservable. It's
a bit like the Weyl gauge parameter.

Note that the geodesic equation for a non-spinning point test particle is

D^2x^u/ds^2 = d^2x^u/ds^2 - (LC)^uvw(dx^v/ds)(dx^w/ds) = 0

So the 1/L's in the (LC)s cancel the L's in x2 & x^3

Similarly with geodesic deviation

d(x^u - x'^u)/ds = R^uvwl(x^v - x'^v)(dx^w/ds)(dx^l/ds)

Note that (LC)^uvw and R^uvwl are NEVER MEASURED DIRECTLY in isolation.
What is measured is

D^2x^u/ds^2

and

d(x^u - x'^u)/ds
Back to top
Ken S. Tucker
science forum Guru


Joined: 30 Apr 2005
Posts: 1230

PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 1:13 am    Post subject: Re: "Weyl" type hidden gauge invariance in General Relativity Reply with quote

Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Quote:
OK we hit a temporary snag solved below. In elementary physics first
rule is to check your units and physical dimensions. Don't mix apples

with oranges etc. Yet GR theorists do that nonchalantly and sloppily
even in text books.

Agreed, I'd rather call this thread *units in tensor
analysis*, that can be ambiguous, let's do a primitive
example.

1)Draw a straight Line on a blank piece of paper.
2)Trace that Line using 1 inch graph paper.
3)Trace using 1 cm graph paper.

All 3 lines are equal, in all CS's (independant of the
graph paper) and so the Line is invariant.

Let's set X^1 = inches and x^1 = cm's then

X^1 = 2.54 x^1 , ie. 1 inch = 2.54 cm's,

is the tranformation.

The invariant *Line* is given by,

Line = E_1 X^1 = e_1 x^1

where

E_1 = 1/inch in direction X^1,

e_1 = 1/cm in direction x^1 .

Please note Line has no units on the blank paper
(1) above. It can only have a measurement in
(2) or (3) or other graph paper.
The "E_1" and "e_1" are refered to as covariant
basis vectors.

We'll follow the usual convention and define the
"metric tensor" by scalar (dot) product like,

g_UV = E_U.E_V and g_uv = e_u.e_v .

It follows g_UV and g_uv have units of 1/area,
i.e. 1/inch^2 and 1/cm^2 respectively, so that
Line is invariant (has no units in any CS).

We then define the usual "norm" by

Line^2 = g_UV X^U X^V = g_uv x^u x^v = invariant.

You can test that using the transformation,
(check out a handy 30cm ~ 12 inch ruler), and
find the invariant to a *unitless* scalar as
all scalars must be.

Since 1 second =~ 3*10^5 km by international
agreement, extending the above to 4D SpaceTime
CS's is straightfoward.

Below are some issues Jack highlights...
Regards
Ken S. Tucker

Quote:
For example, the SSS metric is typically written as

gtt = -(1 - 2GM/c^2r) [dimensionless]

grr = (1 - 2GM/c^2r)^-1 [dimensionless]

But hold on

gthetatheta = r^2 [area]

gphiphi = r^2sin^2theta [area]

Where we have the incommensurate basis set of Cartan 1-forms

dx^0 = cdt
dx^1 = dr
dx^2 = dtheta
dx^3 = dphi

With the Grassmann basis sort of "Clifford" algebra" of 2^4 = 16
p-forms, p = 0,1,2,3,4

*p-form = (4 - p)-form, when N = 4.

1

dx^u

dx^u/\dx^v

dx^u/\dx^v/\dx^w

dx^u/\dx^v/\dx^w/\dx^l

This gives an incommensurate set of Levi-Civita connection field
components in the hovering LNIFs

(LC)^001 = [2(1 - 2GM/c^2r)]^-1 (1 - 2GM/c^2r),r [1/length]

(LC)^122 = -r(1 - 2GM/c^2r) [length]

(LC)^233 = -sinthetacostheta [dimensionless]

(LC)^100 = (1/2)(1 - 2GM/c^2r),r(1 - 2GM/c^2r) [1/length]

(LC)^133 = -(rsin^2theta)(1 - 2GM/c^2r) [length]

(LC)^313 = (LC)^212 = 1/r [1/length]

(LC)^111 = (1/2)(1 - 2GM/c^2r)(1 - 2GM/c^2r)^-1,r [1/length]

(LC)^323 = cottheta [dimensionless]

all other (LC) identically & globally zero in this FRAME BUNDLE of
hovering LNIFs all over this toy model 4D space-time

My original suggestion gthetatheta = gphiphi = 1 will not work here
because physically we have a stretch-squeeze tidal curvature that
requires the theta dependence in addition to the radial dependence.

Nevertheless we MUST use commensurate infinitesimal basis sets for
our
local frames and the (LC) components MUST all be of the same physical

dimension in order to define consistent Diff(4) covariant
derivatives.

For example

Au;v = Au,v - (LC)uv^wAw

The GRAVITY-MATTER MINIMAL COUPLING SUM (LC)uv^wAw must have
physically
commensurate (LC) components because Au is arbitrary! For example, Au

can be the Maxwell EM vector potential, and all the components of Au
have same physical dimensions.

Therefore ALL the (LC) MUST obey [LC] = 1/length

So, how to we accomplish this?

Simple, use engineering dimensional analysis and introduce a scale L.

What is L? Is L = Lp = (hG/c^3)^1/2 or is L = GM/c^2 or?

For now let's call it "L".

Therefore the SSS metric is now the physically commensurate
dimensionless array

gtt = -(1 - 2GM/c^2r)

grr = (1 - 2GM/c^2r)^-1

gthetatheta = (r/L)^2

gphiphi = (r/L)^2sin^2theta

Where we NOW have the commensurate set of basic 1-forms

dx^0 = cdt
dx^1 = dr
dx^2 = Ldtheta
dx^3 = Ldphi

Note that

,0 = (1/c),t

,1 = ,r

,2 = (1/L),theta

,3 = (l/L),phi

Therefore, all the (LC) are now [1/length]

LC)^001 = [2(1 - 2GM/c^2r)]^-1 (1 - 2GM/c^2r),r

(LC)^122 = -(r/L^2)(1 - 2GM/c^2r)

(LC)^233 = -(1/L)sinthetacostheta

(LC)^100 = (1/2)(1 - 2GM/c^2r),r(1 - 2GM/c^2r)

(LC)^133 = -(rsin^2theta/L^2)(1 - 2GM/c^2r)

(LC)^313 = (LC)^212 = 1/r

(LC)^111 = (1/2)(1 - 2GM/c^2r)(1 - 2GM/c^2r)^-1,r

(LC)^323 = (1/L)cottheta [dimensionless]

The Riemann-Christoffel tensor is now dimensionally self-consistent,
i.e. 1/Area

Note that L cancels out of the frame invariant

ds^2 = guvdx^udx^v

and it must cancel out of any local physical quantity.

In particular it must cancel out of the geodesic equation and the
tidal
geodesic deviation.

It's pretty obvious that L will be physically locally unobservable.
It's
a bit like the Weyl gauge parameter.

Note that the geodesic equation for a non-spinning point test
particle is

D^2x^u/ds^2 = d^2x^u/ds^2 - (LC)^uvw(dx^v/ds)(dx^w/ds) = 0

So the 1/L's in the (LC)s cancel the L's in x2 & x^3

Similarly with geodesic deviation

d(x^u - x'^u)/ds = R^uvwl(x^v - x'^v)(dx^w/ds)(dx^l/ds)

Note that (LC)^uvw and R^uvwl are NEVER MEASURED DIRECTLY in
isolation.
What is measured is

D^2x^u/ds^2

and

d(x^u - x'^u)/ds
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [2 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Fri Jul 08, 2011 4:28 am | All times are GMT
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics » Research
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts Emergence of Lorentz invariance in condensed matter app02drm Relativity 0 Thu Sep 21, 2006 10:10 am
No new posts Emergence of Lorentz invariance in condensed matter app02drm Research 1 Thu Sep 21, 2006 9:52 am
No new posts "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Obs... Tde Physics 0 Thu Jul 20, 2006 5:11 pm
No new posts "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Obs... Tde New Theories 0 Thu Jul 20, 2006 5:11 pm
No new posts "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Obs... Tde Particle 0 Thu Jul 20, 2006 5:11 pm

Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Electronics forum |  Medicine forum |  Unix/Linux blog |  Unix/Linux documentation |  Unix/Linux forums  |  send newsletters
 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.0472s ][ Queries: 16 (0.0023s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]