FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics » Relativity
Kirchhoff & Planck = Michell & Hawking.
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [3 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
socratus
science forum Guru Wannabe


Joined: 01 Mar 2006
Posts: 100
Location: Israel

PostPosted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 10:28 am    Post subject: Kirchhoff & Planck = Michell & Hawking. Reply with quote

The question is:
Hawking radiation theorizes that black holes do not, in fact,
absorb all radiation absolutely; they give off some return radiation.
How does this radiation escape?
========================
1.
G. Kirchhoff in 1859 thought up - an absolutely black body.
( Kircchoff 's vacuum radiation / Max Laue/ ).
Absolutely black body is imagined body absorbing all
falling radiation on it. Quantum of light which will get this area
practically will not radiate back.
2.
The concept of a black hole, so massive, that even quantum of light can
not
to escape from it, was put forward by John Michell in 1783.
3.
It is visible that the Kirchhoff 's model (absolutely black body) and

the Michell's model (black hole) are identical.
4.
Quantum of light which got into area of
"absolutely black body " and practically
did not radiate back.
But it is known, that such condition means" thermal death ".
And in Nature it is not observed.
Therefore Max Planck, studying this area, came to a conclusion:
Such condition can change when radiation of quantum of light
having own internal impulse h=Et will take place.
5.
In 1974 S. Hawking came up with theoretical arguments
showing that black holes are not really entirely black:
they can emit radiation.
6.
Now all of us will wait for " new Max Planck ",
who will prove, that
" famous Hawking's radiation " / A. Sakharov / consists of
quantums of light, which are describe with the formula h=Et.
7.
We have again invented a wheel,
we have again discovered America.
========================
It is interesting for me to know, where the man keeps his brain,
if he does not see, that " absolutely black body " and
" black hole " are identical models?
Back to top
socratus
science forum Guru Wannabe


Joined: 01 Mar 2006
Posts: 100
Location: Israel

PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 2:53 pm    Post subject: Re: Kirchhoff & Planck = Michell & Hawking. Reply with quote

Questions:
The Quantum physics approves, that the " virtual particles "
are connected with Vacuum.
To which reference frame does the " black hole" belong?
To which reference frame does the "dark matter" concern?
Back to top
socratus
science forum Guru Wannabe


Joined: 01 Mar 2006
Posts: 100
Location: Israel

PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 3:38 pm    Post subject: Re: Kirchhoff & Planck = Michell & Hawking. Reply with quote

1.
An absolutely black body is a hypothetical body that
completely absorbs all the radiation falling on it.
Physicists said: "No such body can exist."
2.
Black hole, is a region of space which no radiation
can be run away from it.
3.
The Absolute Zero: T=0K is a region of space
in which the motion of radiation died.
4.
But Planck said that from absolutely black body
a quantum of light can radiate.
5.
But Hawking showed that black holes can emit radiation.
6.
And the quantum theory said that in Vacuum there is
" virtual motion of particles. "
7.
Maybe absolutely black body and black holes are
Only models of region of Absolute Zero space: T=0K.
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [3 Posts] View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Sat Jun 18, 2011 12:49 am | All times are GMT
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics » Relativity
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts Do Rindler horizons emit Bekenstein-Hawking radiation? frank_k_sheldon@yahoo.co. Relativity 7 Sat Jul 08, 2006 9:57 am
No new posts Black hole physics disproved, Go on Hawking! Nick Relativity 34 Sat Mar 25, 2006 11:36 pm
No new posts Planck PRESSURE Pp ..a VARiABLE. brian a m stuckless Fusion 0 Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:20 am
No new posts Planck PRESSURE Pp ..a VARiABLE. brian a m stuckless Electromagnetics 1 Wed Mar 01, 2006 3:57 am
No new posts Planck PRESSURE Pp ..a VARiABLE. brian a m stuckless Math 1 Wed Mar 01, 2006 3:57 am

Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Electronics forum |  Medicine forum |  Unix/Linux blog |  Unix/Linux documentation |  Unix/Linux forums  |  send newsletters
 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.0718s ][ Queries: 16 (0.0464s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]