FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   PreferencesPreferences   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics » Relativity
"Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [1 Post] View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Tde
science forum beginner


Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 5:11 pm    Post subject: "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations" Reply with quote

"Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"

Cosmological observations have recently indicated that the "expansion"
of the universe to be faster at extreme distances than it is over most of
its observable volume. There have been attempts to reconcile these
observations with the predictions of General Relativity. These attempts, for
example, resurrected Dr. Einstein's idea of the cosmological constant as a
possible source of a repulsive force to explain this effect. This is rather
startling since one does not have to be a rocket scientist to recognize that
the so-called cosmological constant is the conventional gravitational
constant expressed in terms of the energy represented by the gravitational
masses involved. Obviously if a repulsive force existed which was equal and
opposite to the conventional gravitational force, there would be no net
force to cause the Universe to contract and the static Universe which was
the cosmological belief at the time would result. When the expansion of the
Universe was recognized , Dr. Einstein recanted his belief in the
cosmological constant.

What is overlooked is the fact that when we observe extreme distances
such as exist when we look at the source of the "big bang" or in a
direction opposite to that source we are looking backwards in time. The
description of the "Big bang" tells us that the Universe suddenly appeared
at a point in space which then underwent an almost instantaneous
"inflationary expansion" which then settled down to the more sedate
expansion we presently observe. In other words, at the beginning the rate of
expansion was apparently much larger than it is now. The same effect is to
be expected when we look outward to extreme distances. We are making
observations of events which occurred very early in the history of the
Universe. If, at that time, the Universe was apparently expanding in an
"inflationary" manner, it must also apparently expand in an inflationary
manner at extreme distances. What we should see is that the rate of the
universe's expansion increases at extreme distances, and this is what is
being observed! The only mystery is what is causing the inflation.

When one correctly derives General Relativity the source of the
apparent "inflationary" expansion becomes readily apparent. The strangeness
occurs as a result of Dr. Einstein's incredibly naive error in the
derivation. Correctly derived, General Relativity provides meets all of the
observational tests which are alleged to have verified (valid only in weak
fields such as exist in the Solar system. The corrected gravitational theory
account for:

A:- The observed gravitational force in terms of three dimensional Euclidean
Space (observationally verified).

B:- It is consistent with the ABSOLUTE validity of the Law of Conservation
of Energy.

C:- It eliminates the idea of "Black Holes" since gravitational pressure and
radiation pressure at extreme densities (twice the ABSOLUTE "Event Horizon"
radius or less) gravitational pressure and radiation pressure balance each
other and gravitational collapse ceases. (See
http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm.)

D:- The apparent "inflationary expansion" at extreme distances results from
the fact that the ABSOLUTE velocity of light was much higher in the past.

The source material for this posting may be found in
http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm (1997); http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm
(1987); and http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm (1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE
ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS
TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE
MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.

All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at the
http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.

Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

E-mail:- einsteinhoax@isp.com. If you wish a reply, be sure that your
mail reception is not blocked.

The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided.
Back to top
Google

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 [1 Post] View previous topic :: View next topic
The time now is Tue Jun 21, 2011 2:31 pm | All times are GMT
Forum index » Science and Technology » Physics » Relativity
Jump to:  

Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Last Post
No new posts "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Obs... Tde Physics 0 Thu Jul 20, 2006 5:11 pm
No new posts "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Obs... Tde New Theories 0 Thu Jul 20, 2006 5:11 pm
No new posts "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Obs... Tde Particle 0 Thu Jul 20, 2006 5:11 pm
No new posts Electromagnetic theory without Relativity h_v_ansari@yahoo.com Physics 0 Mon Jul 17, 2006 4:44 pm
No new posts Electromagnetic theory without Relativity h_v_ansari@yahoo.com Electromagnetics 4 Mon Jul 17, 2006 4:28 pm

Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
Other DeniX Solutions sites: Electronics forum |  Medicine forum |  Unix/Linux blog |  Unix/Linux documentation |  Unix/Linux forums  |  send newsletters
 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.1627s ][ Queries: 16 (0.1124s) ][ GZIP on - Debug on ]